This trial assesses the quality of life in patients with high grade glioma and their caregivers using a questionnaire called the Beacon Patient Related Outcomes Quality of Life (PROQOL). Knowledge gained from this trial may help researchers find out if early integration of palliative care will lead to improvement in quality of life for both patients and caregivers.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess feasibility of intra-office Beacon Patient Related Outcomes Quality of Life Scale (PROQOL) assessment of patient and caregiver. II. Assess feasibility of routine (monthly) visits with palliative care specialists. III. Evaluate if overall quality of life of patients with high grade glioma and their caregivers improves with identifying and addressing symptoms and psychosocial concerns identified through the PROQOL tool. IV. Evaluate if overall quality of life of patients with high grade glioma improves further with early integration of palliative care. V. Evaluate if overall quality of life of primary caregivers improves with early integration of palliative care. VI. Compare patient's perception and understanding of disease severity and prognosis with that of the caregivers, and with that of the clinicians. VII. Evaluate variance in prognosis between the neurooncologist and palliative care specialist. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 groups. GROUP A: Patients and primary caregiver complete the Beacon PROQOL survey before each visit. Patients then receive standard of care for high grade glioma consisting of visits with neuro-oncologist monthly for 6 months to address concerns that are identified via the survey and the domain of concern identified by patient and caregiver. GROUP B: Patients and primary caregiver complete the Beacon PROQOL survey before each visit. Patients then receive standard of care for high grade glioma consisting of visits with neuro-oncologist and palliative care team monthly for 6 months to address concerns that are identified by the survey and domains of concerns. Caregivers also attend support sessions led by a social worker monthly for 6 months. GROUP C: Patients and primary caregiver complete quality of life portion of the Beacon PROQOL survey before each visit. Patients then receive standard of care for high grade glioma consisting of visits with neuro-oncologist monthly for 6 months and address important concerns that come up on the survey. Patients may also receive palliative care consultation as deemed appropriate by the neuro-oncologist.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
16
Visit with palliative care team
Ancillary studies
Visit with neuro-oncologist
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Change in feasibility of using the Beacon Patient Reported Outcomes Quality of Life Scale (PROQOL)
Patients will be randomized to 3 groups - Control (standard of care); Arm A (PROQOL + standard of care); Arm B (early palliative care + Arm A). Feasibility of conducting the assessment at monthly visits for each patient/caregiver cluster, along with early involvement of palliative care, will be assessed.
Time frame: monthly for six months
Change in feasibility of using a single question to assess prognostic understanding in patients, caregivers, and clinicians
At each visit, patients, their caregivers, and the clinicians will be asked to estimate survival time left with options being weeks, weeks to months, several months to years, indefinite number of years, or they may choose not to answer.
Time frame: monthly for 6 months
Quality of life of patients and caregivers
Quality of life is being assessed with a 10 question survey that inquires about overall well being, physical and emotional health, stressors, interaction, and mood. Depending on the question, a higher score may be worse (for example - how would you score your anxiety where 10 is worst; versus how would you score your emotional well being where 10 is worst). The minimum value for each question is 0 and the maximum is 10. This scale has been used in other studies with Beacon. A summary statistic for each patient will be developed depending on the individual responses. Full survey can be reviewed upon request.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Discordance in prognostic understanding over time
We will assess how patients, caregivers, and their clinicians differently understand prognosis of the patient in a longitudinal fashion.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Complete survey