The positive effects of fever are supported by a number of physiological, pathophysiological and clinical evidence. However, the negative attitude toward fever is widespread and have become persistent. According to sociological research, this is based on two main factors: comfort and fear. To change this negative attitude, awareness needs to be raised and the attitude toward fever among health care workers and the lay public needs to be reframed positively. Furthermore, the role of media users is essential, especially among the young generation. The current Hungarian recommendation/protocol is valid since 2011 (Professional protocol of the Ministry of National Resources: Caring for a child with fever, the recommendation of the College of Pediatric and Pediatric However, the practical implementation among health professionals and the laity public is low. Based on this protocol and current international guidelines (NICE) clinicians developed a protocol and register, where parents and caregivers can document the symptoms and runoff of fever as well as receive feedback on severity and appropriate management. The project aims to increase the evidence-based (EBM) guideline adherence, to reduce the unnecessary use of antipyretics and antibiotics, as well as the load on the current healthcare system. The documentation of the collected data allows the investigators to map and analyze (stats) socio-demographic behavior both on individual and societal level.
Goal: Reframing the negative attitude toward fever. Reducing unnecessary use of drugs (antipyretics and antibiotics) as well as lower the number of medical consultations. In order, the investigators will use a media-based mobile application and a web knowledge base. Languages English and Hungarian. Hypotheses: 1. The mobile application and knowledge base increases health literacy of parents and professionals. 2. The application will change the uncertain and/or negative attitude toward fever. 3. The positive change in attitude will influence antipyretic and consecutive antibiotic use, lower medical provider contact, enhancing the practical implementation of guidelines. Method: Noninvasive, noninterventional, self-reported, observational, prospective cohort study under real-life conditions. Data: provided by caregivers and/or patients are grouped and classified based on the severity of the disease behind the fever. Data analysis: Analysis sample size calculation: To analyze guideline-adherent and non-adherent behavior at a 95% binomial confidence interval with an accuracy of +/- 2%, at least 500 fever phases are required if the smaller group comprises 5%. The investigators a-priory estimation based on surveys is that only about 15% of caretakers have a guideline-conforming approach to the management of fever, hence 1,500 fever events are needed for the planned accuracy. If adherent and non-adherent groups are approximately the same size, a maximum of ca. 2,500 fever phases are required. The exact incidence of fever per age group is not yet known. Larger samples are required - and expected - for subgroup analyses (e.g. between age groups). Recruitment will therefore continue throughout to year 3 and beyond. The Chi² test is used to compare two subgroups. Sample size planning cannot take unplanned multiple testing into account, so the results can only be interpreted exploratively. Subsample calculations: If a difference of 5% between two frequencies is interpreted as clinically significant, at a power of 80% and an alpha error probability of 5% assuming normal distribution in both subsamples, the following sample sizes are required: For a very rare sample, ca. 200 cases per subsample are sufficient. If the rate is around 50%, ca. 1,600 cases per subsample are required. Software: IBM SPSS Statistics 22, Microsoft Excel ... Research partners providing theoretical and professional background: University of Pécs Hungarian Medical Chamber (Győr-Moson-Sopron Megye) University of Witten Heim Pál Childrens Hospital National Emergency Service Healthware Tanácsadó Kft. Dr. Szőke Henrik és Társa Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Kft. Organizational tasks are conducted in the framework of the University of Pécs, Faculty of Health Sciences and by the Civil Support Közhasznú Nonprofit Kft.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
10,000
Registration, documentation of patients profile, documentation of fever events, following advice regarding the patient and the care-giver, documentation of follow up notifications.
University of Pecs
Pécs, Hungary
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 1
body temperature grade Celsius
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 2
duration of fever in days
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 3
medication, vaccination type and dosage
Time frame: Before and during the period of single fever event (up to 20 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 4
hydration: normal - somewhat decreased - severely decreased
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 5
ventilation: rate per minute
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 6
ventilation: wheezing and dyspnea (subjective scale 1-2-3-4-5; minimum 1; maximum 5; 1 is no symptom = better, 5 is the worst)
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 7
skin condition: color and rash
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 8
pulse rate beat per minute
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 9
crying quality (no, normal, abnormal)
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 10
eating last time in hours
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 11
urination painful or smelly (yes - no)
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 12
awareness: normal - sleepy - no (subjective scale; minimum = best = normal; maximum = worst = no)
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 13
exotic trip in the last 12 month yes - no
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 14
seizure yes - no
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 15
wry neck yes - no
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Fever events outcome, condition of the patient 16
pain yes - no pain location local - general duration hours
Time frame: During the period of single fever event (up to 5 days)
Care-givers state 1
Care-givers own feeling about the progress of patients illness (subjective scale,1 best = optimal - 2 = not sure - 3 = worst = very worried)
Time frame: During the period of fever event (up to 5 days)
Care-givers state 2
Care-givers personal opinion about patients state: (subjective scale: minimum = best = not severe, middle = somewhat severe, maximum = worst = very severe)
Time frame: During the period of fever event (up to 5 days)
Care-givers state 3
Care-givers self-confidence in handling the situation (subjective scale: maximum = confident; worse = somewhat confident, even worse = not really, minimum = worst = not at all)
Time frame: During the period of fever event (up to 5 days)
Action taken, evaluation 1
Use of medication, use of medical providers service, utility of the device and knowledge base
Time frame: 48 hours after illness resolving
Action taken, evaluation 2
Use of medication no - yes (type and dosage)
Time frame: 48 hours after illness resolving
Action taken, evaluation 3
Use of medical providers service no - yes (institution type)
Time frame: 48 hours after last fever event documentation
Action taken, evaluation 4
Utility of the device and knowledge base (subjective scale 1-2-3-4-5; minimum 1 = worst; maximum 5 = best)
Time frame: 48 hours after last fever event documentation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.