Most mental health problems emerge by age 14, often leading to chronic impairments and adverse impacts for individuals, families, and societies. Any action-focused path to reducing the need-to-access gap will require moving beyond the dominant settings, formats, and systems that have constrained intervention delivery to date. In a fully-online trial, youths ages 13-16 will be randomized to 1 of 3 self-administered single-session interventions (SSIs): a behavioral activation SSI, targeting behavioral MD symptoms; an SSI teaching growth mindset, targeting cognitive MD symptoms; or a control SSI. The investigators will test each SSI's relative benefits, versus the control, on depressive symptoms and proximal outcomes such as hopelessness. Results will reveal whether SSIs that were designed to address behavioral versus cognitive symptoms differentially benefit adolescents with elevated depressive symptoms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
2,452
Online, 30-minute self-administered program for youth
Online, 30-minute self-administered program for youth
Online, 30-minute self-administered program for youth
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Change in Adolescent Depressive Symptom Severity
The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) 2 - short form (CDI-SF) is a reliable, valid measure of youth depression severity, normed for youth age and sex and yielding raw scores ranging from 0-24, where higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of depression.
Time frame: Pre-SSI to 3-month follow-up
Change in State Hope Scale - Pathways Subscale
The State Hope Scale - Pathways Subscale asks participants to rate 3 statements based on how they think about themselves right now. Participants rate the 3 statements on an 8 point scale ranging from 0 (Definitely False) to 7 (Definitely True). Total score ranges, reflecting the average across all items, range from 0-7, with higher scores representing more flexible/greater perceived pathways to solving one's problems.
Time frame: Pre-SSI to Immediately Post-SSI; Pre-SSI to 3-month follow-up
Change in Beck Hopelessness Scale - 4 Item Version
4 item version (BHS-4; referenced as 'How I Think Scale' in appended materials): This scale asks participants to rate 4 statements based on their sense of hopelessness. Participants rate the 4 statements on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (Absolutely Disagree) to 3 (Absolutely Agree). Average scores across all items range from 0 to 3, with a higher score indicating greater levels of hopelessness.
Time frame: Pre-SSI to Immediately Post-SSI; Pre-SSI to 3-month follow-up
Program Feedback Scale
The PFS asks youth to rate agreement with 7 statements indicating perceived acceptability of an SSI (e.g. "I enjoyed the program") on a 5-point Likert scale (1="really disagree"; 5="totally agree"). A score of 3.5/5 or above on any given PFS item is interpreted as an "acceptable" rating on that item. Scores are calculated at the item-level, and higher scores reflect greater acceptability for each item.
Time frame: Immediately Post-SSI only
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.