National Evaluation of the Close Collaboration With Parents Training

Overview

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an educational intervention for neonatal staff on parent-infant physical closeness during their infant's stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and parents' and staff perception on family centered care in the unit. This pre-post intervention study was carried out in nine hospitals in Finland in 2012 through 2018. Data was collected by using daily parental diaries, daily text message questions to parents and an audit interview for the staff.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an educational intervention for neonatal staff on parent-infant physical closeness during their infant's stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and parents' and staff perception on family centered care (FCC) in the unit. We hypothesized that parents spend more time in the unit and have more skin-to skin contact with their infant after the intervention compared to the time before the intervention. We also hypothesized that care culture becomes more family centered after the intervention both from parent and staff perspectives. Study NICUs and participants This study was an intervention study, comparing the situation before and after the intervention. It was carried out in nine NICUs in Finland, including two level III hospitals and seven level II hospitals. The study progressed stepwise between May 2012 and September 2018; two or three hospitals participated in the study simultaneously. The study permission was granted by the Hospital District of Southwest Finland (T57/2012) and separately by each study site. The study participants were recruited during three-month periods before and after the Close Collaboration with Parents training program, which lasted for 18 months. Every parent of an infant estimated to stay in the NICU longer than three days was approached. Other inclusion criteria were: 1) the infant had no major congenital anomalies or syndromes, 2) the parents spoke Finnish or Swedish, 3) the family lived in the catchment area of the hospital. A log including infant's gestational age, birth weight, the length of hospital period and the distance to home was kept for all admissions of infants with a length of stay longer than 3 days to identify eligible parents and evaluate drop-out rate. The staff introduced the study protocol to parents and gave them at least one day to consider their participation. After the parents signed the informed consent form, they were given instructions for use of the closeness diaries and text messages. The parents provided infant characteristics (including gestational age, birthweight, birth head circumference, sex, mode of delivery, and whether the infant was a singleton/multiple or had siblings) and family characteristics (including parents' age, education, socio-economic status and the distance from the hospital to home). Closeness diary The duration of parents' presence in the NICU and skin-to-skin contact (SSC) was reported with closeness diaries. Presence in the unit was defined by being inside the unit, not necessarily all the time in the room of the baby. SSC was defined as the baby lying on the parent's bare chest dressed only in a diaper and a cap if necessary. On the diary, there were four different timelines where parents filled in the time spent in NICU and SSC with their infant: mother present, mother SSC, father present, and father SSC. Parents were asked to fill in the diaries from the time of recruitment until discharge. During data collection, the diaries were stored in a folder at the bedside so that other families or nurses did not see the diaries. Intervention The Close Collaboration with Parents intervention was developed based on theoretical evidence from infant neurobehavioral and attachment theories. The training is based on a multi-method learning philosophy using theoretical teaching, hands-on teaching at bedside, and reflective discussions supporting simultaneous implementation of practice change. The intervention teaches new skills to the entire staff of a unit to collaborate with parents in order to support parents' presence and involvement in infant's care. The original intervention was condensed to a structured 18-month-long training including four phases. A facilitator network model was used including local mentors trained by the trainer mentors and a supervisor. BLISS Audit tool The data from staff were collected using the Bliss Baby Charter Audit Tool with permission of Bliss organization. The audit tool is a self-assessment instrument identifying areas of improvement in the quality of FCC in NICUs. The tool has 141 statements divided into seven core principles which summarize the care, respect and support that infants and their parents should receive. All seven principles contain different categories of family-centered care (as defined by Bliss). The categories are 1) Active care by parent and staff, (18 criteria), 2) Parent and family support (17 criteria), 3) Communication (6 criteria), 4) Developmental care (9 criteria), 5) Empowered decision making (10 criteria), 6) Facilities (17 criteria) ,7) Guidelines and policies (17 criteria), 8) Staff skills and training (12 criteria), 9) Information provision (27 criteria) and 10) Service improvement and parent involvement (8 criteria). DigiFCC Parents evaluated the quality of FCC with DigiFCC-P tool by answering to the text-message questions delivered by mobile phones. The tool was developed for the evaluation of the Close Collaboration with Parents training Program. Parents received one randomized question from seven questions every evening during their infant hospitalization. The tool was further developed based on feedback from parents, staff, and researchers to improve its content validity and feasibility after the first four hospitals. In hospitals 5 to 9, parents received one randomized question from nine questions every evening during their infant hospitalization. The questions were: 1) To what extent did the staff listen to you today? 2) To what extent did you participate in your baby's care today? 3) To what extent did the guidance provided by the staff meet your needs today? 4) To what extent was your opinion considered in decisions made about your baby today? 5) To what extent did you trust the staff in the care of your baby today? 6) To what extent did the staff trust you in the care of your baby today? 7) To what extent did you participate in the discussion during the medical round? 8) To what extent did the information provided by the staff meet your needs today? 9) To what extent did the staff offer you emotional support today? Parents rated their responses on a 5-point Likert scale in hospitals 1 to 4, and in a 7-point Likert scale in hospitals 5 to 9 (1-7, with 1= not at all, 7= very much) or 0, if they were not in the NICU that day. Nurses evaluated the quality of FCC with the DigiFCC-N tool. Nurses answered corresponding questions with the parents' questions exception of the question that concerned parental participation in the medical round. Questions to nurses were in a form: "To what extent did you listen to parents today?" Nurses gave the answer through a Web questionnaire using the computer assigned for the research purpose. Nurses replied one randomized question after each work shift during a 3-months study period before and after the training program. Statistical methods Parents' presence was defined as at least one parent present. Mothers' and fathers' presence and SSC were also analysed separately. We compared the pre-intervention and post-intervention cohorts adjusting for gestational age, siblings in the family, and the neonatal unit in the statistical model. These confounders were chosen based their significance on parents' presence. The comparison of presence and SSC was analyzed using a linear model, where cohorts were independent families, siblings in the family and neonatal unit were handled as categorical variables, and gestational age as a continuous covariate. Analyses were performed for mother and father separately and then also as combined (at least one parent present, either parent SSC). All diaries until the last one were included in the analyses, also the days without presence or SSC or missing data. All statistical tests were performed as two-sided, with a significance level set at 0.05. The analyses were performed using SAS System, version 9.4 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Outcomes