Low-dose glucocorticoid treatment is the only intervention shown to significantly reduce mortality in cases of COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. In particular, a large UK randomized controlled trial (RECOVERY trial) demonstrated the efficacy of dexamethasone at a dosage of 6mg/day for 10 days in reducing mortality compared to usual therapy, with a greater impact on patients requiring mechanical ventilation (36% reduction) or oxygen therapy (18% reduction) than on those who did not need respiratory support (doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436). However, there is still paucity of information guiding glucocorticoid administration in severe pneumonia/ARDS and no evidence of the superiority of a steroid drug -nor of a therapeutic scheme- compared to the others, which led to a great heterogeneity of treatment protocols and misinterpretation of available findings. In a recent longitudinal observational study conducted in Italian respiratory high-dependency units, a protocol with prolonged low-dose methylprednisolone demonstrated a 71% reduction in mortality and the achievement of other secondary endpoints such as an increase in ventilation-free days by study day 28 in a subgroup of patients with severe pneumonia and high levels of systemic inflammation (doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa421). The treatment was well tolerated and did not affect viral shedding from the airways. In light of these data, the present study aims to compare the efficacy of a methylprednisolone protocol and that of a dexamethasone protocol based on previous evidence in increasing survival by day 28, as well as in reducing the need and duration for mechanical ventilation, among hospitalized patients requiring noninvasive respiratory support (oxygen supplementation and/or noninvasive ventilation).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
690
Per-protocol methylprednisolone administration and tapering (see arm description)
Per-protocol dexamethasone administration (see arm description)
Marco Confalonieri
Trieste, TS, Italy
Survival
Survival proportion at 28 days in both arms
Time frame: 28 days
Reduction in the need for mechanical ventilation
Number of days free from mechanical ventilation (either noninvasive or invasive) by study day 28 in both arms
Time frame: 28 days
Length of hospitalization
Number of days of hospitalization for patients discharged alive in both arms
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 60 days
Need for tracheostomy
Proportion of patients requiring tracheostomy in both arms
Time frame: Day 28
Reduction in systemic inflammation markers
C-reactive protein level (mg/L) at study day 3, 7 and 14 in both arms
Time frame: Day 3, 7 and 14
Amelioration of oxygenation
PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg) at study day 3, 7 and 14 in both arms
Time frame: Day 3, 7 and 14
Disease progression
WHO clinical progression scale at study day 3, 7 and 14 in both arms
Time frame: Day 3, 7 and 14
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.