There are ongoing debates on the effects of the surgical approach on outcome after total hip arthroplasty. It was hypothesized that with the anterolateral approach, trauma to the abductor arm can be occured and related detrimental effects can diminish the post-operative outcomes. In this first randomized controlled trial in the literature on this subject, isokinetic performance and patient-reported functional outcomes were evaluated in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. with a posterior approach (PA) and a anterolateral approach (ALA), at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty are randomized to posterior approach (PA) and anterolateral approach (ALA) groups. The patients are evaluated preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, with flexion, extension and abduction strength measurements and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The physiatrist performing isokinetic tests and the patients are blinded to the study groups.All data are calculated as mean and standard deviation values. The Student's t-test is used for statistical analysis of the patient data. Statistical calculations are performed using SPSS vn.22.0 software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY, USA).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
48
two different approaches of total hip arthroplasty
Gulhane Teaching and Research Hospital
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
isokinetic test
isokinetic test during flexion, extension and abduction of the hip
Time frame: Change from preoperative isokinetic test results at 6th months and 12th months isokinetic test results
Harris Hip Score
Functional score of the hip. Harris Hip Score: 100-90: Excellent 89-80:Good 79-70:Fair below 70:Poor
Time frame: Change from preoperativeHarris Hip Score results at 6th months and 12th months iHarris Hip Score results
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.