This is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multi-centre, 2-part study to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled AZD1402. Part 1 will be performed in a Lead-in Cohort for each dose level to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) in a population with asthma controlled on medium dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-long acting beta agonists (LABA) before progressing to dosing in adults with asthma who are uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA in Part 2. The study will recruit participants receiving treatment with medium dose ICS with LABA for Part 1 and participants receiving treatment with medium-to-high dose ICS with LABA for Part 2 (separate inhalers or combination product). Part 2 will be initiated following evaluation of safety and PK at the relevant dose level in Part 1a. The entire study period for each participant in both Parts 1 and 2, is approximately 3.5 months; a 2-week Screening Period, a 4 week Run-in Period, 4 weeks of Treatment Period, and 4 weeks of Follow-Up Period.
Part 1 of the study will be randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, and conducted in parallel for the 2 lower dose levels (Part 1a) followed by an unblinded safety review and escalation to the highest dose (Part 1b) dependent on the outcome of the safety review. Part 1a will consist of 30 participants who will be randomised 1:1:1 to receive 1 of the 2 lower AZD1402 dry power inhaler (DPI) doses (Dose 1 or Dose 2) or placebo in parallel. Part 1b will consist of 15 participants who will be randomised 2:1 to receive the highest AZD1402 DPI dose (Dose 3) or placebo. Part 1a Lead-in Cohort * AZD1402 Dose 1 * AZD1402 Dose 2 * Placebo Part 1b Lead-in Cohort * AZD1402 Dose 3 * Placebo Part 2 will be randomised, double blind, placebo controlled and will include approximately 165 participants randomised 2:1 (active to placebo) to evaluate 2 inhaled dose levels of AZD1402 versus placebo. Part 2 will be started after the unblinded safety review for Part 1a. Part 2 will include: * AZD1402 Dose 1 * AZD1402 Dose 2 * Placebo
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
72
Randomised participants will receive oral inhalation of AZD1402, via DPI.
Randomised participants will receive oral inhalation of matching placebo via DPI.
In addition to study intervention, all participants will be provided with a SABA as rescue medication (eg, salbutamol/albuterol), to be used throughout the Run-in and Treatment Periods. All participants should refrain from taking a SABA as rescue medication 6 hours prior to pulmonary function tests. Dosage levels: 100 μg per nominal dose 90 μg per nominal dose pro re nata (as required) (PRN)
During the Run-in Period, the participants are required to maintain on their ICS-LABA dose. Controller medications (eg, ICS LABA) should remain at a stable dose and be taken after study intervention as applicable. These drugs are used as standard of care.
Research Site
Herston, Australia
Research Site
Melbourne, Australia
Research Site
Nedlands, Australia
Research Site
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Berlin, Germany
Part 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Time frame: From Screening (Week -6) until Follow-up (Day 56)
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1
The efficacy of inhaled AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was investigated.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Part 1: Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 12, Day 16, and Day 56
Part 1: Change From Baseline in FEV1 In-clinic Spirometry
The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, and Day 56
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) (In-clinic)
The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo at different dose levels in adults with asthma controlled on medium dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, and Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Titers
ADA-positive samples were tested to investigate the immunogenicity of AZD1402.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Maximum Observed Serum (Peak) Drug Concentration (Cmax)
The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Half-life Associated With Terminal Slope (λz) of a Semi-logarithmic Concentration-time Curve (t1/2λz)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve in the Dosing Interval τ (AUCτ)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-curve From Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Observed Lowest Drug Concentration Reached Before the Next Dose is Administered (Pre-dose) (Ctrough)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Terminal Rate Constant, Estimated by Log-linear Least Squares Regression of the Terminal Part of the Concentration-time Curve (λz)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Volume of Distribution (Apparent) at Steady State Following Extravascular Administration (Based on Terminal Phase) (Vz/F)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Time to Reach Peak or Maximum Observed Concentration or Response Following Drug Administration (Tmax)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Time of Last Observed (Quantifiable) Concentration (Tlast)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for AUCτ (Rac AUC)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 1 and Part 2: Accumulation Ratio for Cmax (Rac Cmax)
The PK profile of AZD1402 was investigated.
Time frame: Day 1 until Day 56
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment Period
The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma who are uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. The ACQ was developed to measure asthma control. In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilation use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher scores indicated a worse outcome. The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and ≤ 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores \> 1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered clinically meaningful.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Part 2: Participants With a Decrease in ACQ 6 Score of ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 4
The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma who are uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. The ACQ was developed to measure asthma control. In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilation use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher scores indicated a worse outcome. The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and ≤ 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores \> 1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered clinically meaningful.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the Treatment Period
The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Peak expiratory flow was measured by the participants at home using a peak flow meter.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Average Evening PEF Over the Treatment Period
The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Peak expiratory flow was measured by the participants at home using a peak flow meter.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Daily Average Asthma Symptom Score (AM/PM) Over the Treatment Period
The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated. Severity scores for asthma symptoms were recorded twice daily in the morning and evening and documented in an e-Diary. Asthma symptom scores during night-time and day-time were assessed by the participant each morning and evening according to the following scoring system: 0: You have no asthma symptoms. 1: You are aware of your asthma symptoms but you can easily tolerate the symptoms. 2: Your asthma is causing you enough discomfort to cause problems with normal activities (or with sleep). 3: You are unable to do your normal activities (or to sleep) because of your asthma. Higher scores indicated worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 Average Over the 4-week Treatment Period
The efficacy of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was further investigated.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Part 2: Change From Baseline in FeNO (In-clinic) at Week 4 and Average Over the Treatment Period
The effect of AZD1402 compared to placebo on airway inflammation in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was investigated. To investigate the effect of AZD1402 on airway inflammation, the measurement of FeNO was performed in accordance with ATS/ERS guidelines. Standardised conditions with regard to exhalation flow rate and duration of exhalation were followed such that plateau definition could be evaluated over a minimum of 3 seconds.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Part 2: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
The safety and tolerability of AZD1402 compared to placebo in adults with asthma uncontrolled on medium-to-high dose ICS-LABA was evaluated.
Time frame: From Screening (Week -6) until Follow-up (Day 56)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Site
Berlin, Germany
Research Site
Berlin, Germany
Research Site
Berlin, Germany
Research Site
Bonn, Germany
...and 30 more locations