Stroke is the third most common cause of death worldwide and the leading cause of disability. High blood pressure is an important risk factor for stroke. Lowering a person's blood pressure reduces the risk of future stroke or heart attack, and current guidelines recommend treatment to a target of \<130mmHg for secondary prevention. Home blood pressure measurement and telemonitoring are acceptable to patients, but there is uncertainty over the use of out of office blood pressure measurements in stroke patients in guidelines. This is a study designed to establish the feasibility of a larger clinical trial, comparing home blood pressure monitoring, telemonitoring and medication titration with standard care. The study hypothesis is that home BP measurement and telemonitoring with medication titration may lead to improved BP control compared to standard of care clinical practice.
Background: Stroke is the third leading cause of global death, the leading cause of acquired disability and contributes substantially to dementia, cognitive decline, and healthcare costs. Global epidemiological studies such as INTERSTROKE and the Global Burden of Disease study estimated that hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for stroke, with a population attributable risk of approximately 50%. Recurrent vascular events (stroke, coronary events, vascular death) cause significant morbidity in ischaemic stroke survivors, affecting approximately 30% at 5 years. High rates of failure to achieve guideline BP targets (\<130mmHg) are reported in clinical practice for patients following ischaemic stroke or TIA. Home blood pressure measurement and telemonitoring is recognised as acceptable to patients from previous studies, and some trials have noted a significant reduction in BP at 12 months. The latest ESO guidelines note continued uncertainty over the use of out-of-office blood pressure measurements for adult patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA due to insufficient data. This trial will recruit patients with recent stroke/TIA events with systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and randomise them to standard of care or home BP monitoring with telemonitoring and medication titration. The study hypothesis is that home BP measurement and telemonitoring with medication titration may lead to improved BP control compared to standard of care clinical practice. Aim: The aim is to conduct an initial pilot randomised trial in Ireland and European centres involved in the European Stroke Organisation Trials Alliance. This feasibility study will assess key design aspects and establish trial governance, data management, and procedures in preparation for a larger definitive trial. Methods: Design: Prospective, open-label, blinded endpoint assessed (PROBE) randomised, parallel group pilot/feasibility clinical trial, comparing BP patient self-measurement and telemonitoring with office-based monitoring (standard of care) for improved BP control after ischaemic stroke/TIA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
142
A medication algorithm based on the SPRINT trial protocol will be provided for patients in the home blood pressure measurement arm. The final choice and dose of antihypertensive treatment(s) will be at the discretion of the treating clinicians. If no contra-indications, indapamide or other thiazide diuretic and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (perindopril or other) will be encouraged as initial therapy, with long-acting calcium-channel antagonists (eg.amlodipine) encouraged as third-line therapy. Patients will have their home blood pressure monitoring diary reviewed by the study team. If SBP is out of the allocated target range, a prescription to titrate antihypertensive medication will be sent to the patient at least monthly.
Participants in the standard of care arm will receive antihypertensive therapy at the physician's discretion to the same treatment target of SBP \<130mmHg.
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
RECRUITINGDifference in mean SBP
The difference in mean SBP between both groups, at 12 months (or last trial visit)
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Proportions of patients assigned to each arm successfully reaching guideline-based target (SBP<130mmHg) at end of trial visit
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Time in guideline-based target range
Proportion of SBP measures \<130 during trial participation
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Time taken to reach target
Time taken to reach target SBP\<130mmHg
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Difference in mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between groups
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Change in SBP/DBP from baseline to end-of-trial
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Time to first composite major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and to each component of the composite, stratified as fatal, non-fatal and total
MACE defined as all recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
All-cause fatality
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Comparison of disability in each intervention arm assessed by modified Rankin score
Shift analysis and proportion with no, mild, or moderate disability, Rankin score 0-3
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Number of dose-titrations required
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Time required per follow up visit
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Number of patients lost to follow-up
Time frame: 12 months (or end of trial visit)
Number of serious adverse events
Difference in proportion of patients with serious adverse events
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Number of pre-specified adverse events
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Change in health related quality of life
Change in EQ5D-5L score (5 domains assessed with scores of 1-5 ranking the severity of impairment, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life) at last follow-up compared with baseline
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Change in cognition
Change in Montreal cognitive assessment score (range 0-30) at last follow-up compared with baseline score. A lower score indicates greater cognitive impairment.
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
Qualitative patient feedback obtained via workshops and questionnaires
Time frame: 12 months (or last trial visit)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.