This study is a prospective observational program within the frames of which Tricor (fenofibrate) is prescribed to patients with hypertriglyceridemia within a routine procedure as a part of the combination therapy with statins.
Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of interrelated risk factors that leads to metabolic dysregulation and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. The increased risk of cardiovascular disease in people with metabolic syndrome has been well established by observational studies and meta-analyses. Strategies to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in primary and secondary prevention focus on the optimization of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. As recommended in current guidelines for lowering blood cholesterol, statins in addition to lifestyle modifications remain the first-line therapy to reduce LDL-C in patients at CVD risk. However, despite optimal reduction of LDL-C with statins and, correction of other modifiable risk factors, CVD risk is not eliminated. The source of this residual risk may be due to other atherogenic lipid species such as reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and/or raised triglycerides (TG) which are only modestly affected by statin therapy. The use of fibrates in the treatment of dyslipidaemia has changed significantly over recent years. The potential of fibrate-statin combination treatment is discussed in guidelines and by the medical community. Fenofibrate treatment usually reduce TG by 40-50%, total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C by 5-20%, as well as small dense LDL by 10-30%. While fibrates are generally well tolerated, combination with a statin might increase the risk of side effects and potentially that of myopathy. In the ACCORD study, fenofibrate coadministered with simvastatin was neither associated with any increase in the incidence of myopathy over that observed with simvastatin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes, nor pointing out any safety concerns for the coadministration. In view of the demonstrated lipid benefit and good safety profile, fenofibrate is suitable for add-on therapy with a statin to minimize the CVD residual risk. This post-marketing observational study is conducted to assess effectiveness of fenofibrate (145 mg daily) as adjuvant therapy to statins administered for 6 months in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and metabolic syndrome.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,000
Observational study without intervention. Fenofibrate is prescribed in routine manner in accordance with clinical practice and the valid Instruction for Medical Use regarding the dose, duration of therapy, patient population, and therapeutic indication.
Change of TG at Visit 3 (6 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1.
Triglycerides will be represented in mmol/L and change of TG will be displayed as mean difference of TG at Visit 3 vs. Visit 1.
Time frame: 6 months
Change of LDL level at Visit 3 (6 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1
Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) will be represented in mmol/L and change of LDL will be displayed as mean difference of LDL at Visit 3 vs. Visit 1.
Time frame: 6months
Change of lipid profile parameters (TC, HDL, non-HDL) at Visit 3 (6 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1
Lipid profile includes total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and non-HDL. The lipid profile parameters will not be combined into 1 value and will be reported as separate values but results will be presented in the same unites of measure (mmol/L). Non-HDL is calculated as total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol. Change of each lipid profile parameter will be displayed as mean difference of the result at Visit 3 vs. Visit 1.
Time frame: 6 months
Change of LDL level at Visit 2 (3 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1.
Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) will be represented in mmol/L and change of LDL will be displayed as mean difference of LDL at Visit 2 vs. Visit 1.
Time frame: 3 months
Change of lipid profile parameters (TC, TG, HDL, non-HDL) at Visit 2 (3 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1.
Lipid profile includes total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and non-HDL. The lipid profile parameters will not be combined into 1 value and will be reported as separate values but results will be presented in the same unites of measure (mmol/L). Non-HDL is calculated as total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol. Change of each lipid profile parameter will be displayed as mean difference of the result at Visit 2 vs. Visit 1.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
City Polyclinic #14 (branch office)
Barnaul, Russia
Clinical Diagnostic Centre
Bryansk, Russia
Polyclinic #1
Cheboksary, Russia
Diagnostic Centre
Cheboksary, Russia
Polyclinic #1
Chelyabinsk, Russia
Polyclinic
Chelyabinsk, Russia
Polyclinic #1
Irkutsk, Russia
Clinical hospital
Irkutsk, Russia
City Polyclinic #4
Irkutsk, Russia
Medical center
Kaliningrad, Russia
...and 53 more locations
Time frame: 3 months
Change of C-reactive protein level at Visit 3 (6 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1
Сhange of C-reactive protein (CRP) will be displayed as mean difference of CRP at Visit 3 vs. Visit 1.
Time frame: 6 months
Change of C-reactive protein level at Visit 2 (3 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1
Сhange of C-reactive protein (CRP) will be displayed as mean difference of CRP at Visit 2 vs. Visit 1.
Time frame: 3 months
The average score on each of 8 scales of Short Form Survey Instrument (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaire at Visit 3 (6 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1.
The 36-Item Health Survey taps eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively, so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Patients will complete this self-reported questionnaire, containing 36 items, for evaluation of the quality of life after 6 months of treatment.
Time frame: 6 months
The average score on each of 8 scales of Short Form Survey Instrument (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaire at Visit 2 (3 months of fenofibrate treatment) versus baseline level at Visit 1
The 36-Item Health Survey taps eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively, so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Patients will complete this self-reported questionnaire, containing 36 items, for evaluation of the quality of life after 3 months of treatment.
Time frame: 3 months