The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcome of using direct esthetic composite restorations in managing MIH cases and the use of preformed metal crowns.
Molar incisor hypomineralization can represent a serious and challenging clinical management problem. Children with MIH require higher levels of treatment needs and demonstrate considerable management problems. For most severely affected MIH molars, direct esthetic restorative materials or preformed metal crowns will be the treatments to choose between. A number of aspects which could support decision-making, however, are not clearly demarcated. First and foremost, it is not clear if both treatments are similarly acceptable for patients and providers.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
60
bulk-fill composite (Filtek BulkFlow, 3M Espe) will be used aftar infiltration or block anaesthesia for affected molar,following by carious tissue removal. Marginal bevelling of enamel will be performed. A universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal, 3M Espe) will be placed after selective enamel etching A bulk-fill composite will be used and covered using a nanohybrid composite, (Filtek XT, 3M Espe).
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
Cairo, Egypt
Hypersensitivity
Questioning the patient and/or the parent (Clemenus et al,2017) Binary (yes, no)
Time frame: 12 month
Acceptability of the treatment
Questioning the children or parents about accepting the treatment Binary (Yes or No)
Time frame: 12 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.