Myocarditis can result in numerous complications, but there is paucity of data regarding optimal therapy, short- and long-term effects of possibly effective immunosuppressive therapy. The IMPROVE-MC study will provide high-quality scientific data about efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy, non-invasive (MRI, biomarkers) and invasive diagnostics tests (endomyocardial biopsy), and prognosis in myocarditis. The objective of this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 - month treatment with prednisone and azathioprine comparing to placebo on top of guideline-recommended medical therapy in patients with biopsy-proven virus negative myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 45%). The study will also assess persistence of the treatment effects after 12 months.
Myocarditis/ inflammatory cardiomyopathy, which often leads to heart failure (HF), is still an under-studied disease with various clinical manifestations. The active myocarditis is found post-mortem even in 42% of sudden deaths of young people and in 9-16% of adults and 46% of children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Moreover, an increase in morbidity and mortality from myocarditis was recorded in the years 1990-2015. Myocarditis significantly increases the risk of HF, serious arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities, sudden death, anxiety, depression and it reduces quality of life. Myocarditis affects mainly young people (18-40 years old, and children) who lead active family life and work. Therefore, the disease causes deterioration of entire family life, it reduces individual productivity, creates high and long-term treatment costs. There is an urgent need to improve myocarditis therapy. Current guidelines recommendations in myocarditis consists of standard treatment of already developed HF and long-term avoidance of physical activity. Due to the lack of good quality scientific data, there is no clear recommendation for the targeted treatment - thus patients' prognosis may be poor. The pathogenesis of myocarditis and limited reports suggest the reasonable chance of significant improvement of patients' survival due to immunosuppressive therapy. Aim: Aim of the IMPROVE-MC study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12-month immunosuppressive treatment with prednisone and azathioprine compared with placebo on the guideline-recommended medical therapy in patients with biopsy-proven virus-negative myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Secondary aim is to create ready-to-use diagnostic and therapeutic scheme in polish and international healthcare systems, which can lead to myocarditis guidelines change. Population and methods: In this multicenter (7 recruitment centers), prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial we are going to include 100 patients aged 18-65 years old, with biopsy-proven virus-negative myocarditis in stable or worsening course of the disease despite standard medical treatment, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% and/or significant cardiac arrhythmias refractory to antiarrhythmic treatment. Exclusion criteria consist of ie.: another specific etiology of HF different from myocarditis; already implanted ventricular assist device; a heart transplant recipient; contraindications to immunosuppressive treatment; suspected sarcoidosis or giant cell myocarditis. Intervention: azathioprine for 12 months and prednisone for the first 6 months versus placebo for 12 months Study course: after randomization patients will undergo one-year double-blind treatment and then one-year follow-up to assess the long-term effects of the treatment. The efficacy and safety of the treatment will be assessed during study visits: investigational products/ placebo will be provided and additional tests will be performed - 48-hour Holter monitoring, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), laboratory tests and follow-up endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) after one-year of treatment. In order to broaden knowledge about myocarditis pathogenesis additional genetic, immunology and proteomic tests will be performed. All echo, MRI, Holter and biopsy tests will be evaluated centrally. Study endpoints: primary endpoint is LVEF at 12-months. secondary endpoints include analysis of: e.g. clinical outcomes, echocardiography, CMR, EMB, laboratory examinations, quality of life and heart failure questionnaires.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
100
Prednisone: 1 mg/kg daily for 4 weeks followed by gradually tapered dose for 5 months
Azathioprine: 2 mg/kg daily for 12 months
Placebo Prednisone
Placebo Azathioprine
First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Poland
RECRUITINGLVEF at 12 - months.
Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) at 12 - months.
Time frame: 12- months
Proportion of patients who responded to immunosuppressive therapy.
Proportion of patients who responded to immunosuppressive therapy as defined by an LVEF increase of ≥10% over time.
Time frame: 12-months
LVEF at 12 months in subgroups of patients with baseline LVEF ≤30% and >30%
Time frame: 12 months
Change in the LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions as well as the LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes over time.
Time frame: 12-months
Change from baseline in NYHA class over time.
Time frame: 12-months
Occurrence of adjudicated heart failure decompensation (hospitalization or ambulatory visit).
Time frame: 12-months
Change from baseline in percentage of patients in NYHA III/IV and NYHA II class over time.
Change from baseline in percentage of patients in NYHA III/IV and NYHA II class over time (compared to baseline and to the end of treatment)
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Occurrence of need for diuretic i.v. administration.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Change from baseline in 6 minute walk test (6MWT) distance over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Time to first adjudicated hospitalization for heart failure.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Time to first all-cause hospitalization.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Occurrence (first and recurrent) of all-cause hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, heart failure outpatient visit, myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy recurrence, all-cause death, heart transplantation, implantation of cardiac device
Occurrence (first and recurrent) of all-cause hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, heart failure outpatient visit, myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy recurrence, all-cause death, heart transplantation, implantation of cardiac device (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy, ventricular assist device) assessed in combination or independently.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
New onset atrial fibrillation (AF).
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
New onset sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF).
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
≥50% reduction from baseline in ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs) number in 48h Holter monitoring over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
≥50% reduction from baseline in nonsustained VT number in 48h Holter monitoring over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
≥50% reduction from baseline in AF burden in 48h Holter monitoring over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Changes from baseline in CMR results
Changes from baseline in CMR results (early gadolinum enhancement (EGE), late gadolinum enhancement (LGE), edema, LV dimensions and volumes, T1/T2 mapping) after one-year.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Changes from baseline in concentration of biomarkers of fibrosis and myocardial necrosis (troponin I, NT-proBNP, sST2, Gal-3) over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Qualitative and quantitative change from baseline in inflammatory infiltration, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) expression and fibrosis in EMB after one-year.
Time frame: after 12- months
Change from baseline in KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) overall summary score over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Change from baseline in KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) total symptom score over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Change from baseline in KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) individual domains over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Change from baseline in KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) based on patient-preferred outcome over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Change from baseline in SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Survey) questionnaire overall summary score over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Change from baseline in PGI-I (Patients Global Impression of Improvement) scale over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Change from baseline in CGI-I (Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement) scale over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Change from baseline in health economic analysis by HCRU (Healthcare Resource Utilization).
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
Occurrence of need for inotropic drugs/nitroglycerin i.v. administration
Occurrence of need for inotropic drugs/nitroglycerin i.v. administration
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
LVEF at 24 months
LVEF at 24 months (maintenance or further improvement).
Time frame: compared to baseline and/or to the end of treatment) analyzed during follow up (13-24 months)
LVEF at 24 months in subgroups of patients with baseline LVEF ≤30% and >30%
LVEF at 24 months (maintenance or further improvement) in subgroups of patients with baseline LVEF ≤30% and \>30%
Time frame: compared to baseline and/or to the end of treatment) analyzed during follow up (13-24 months)
Change in the LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions as well as the LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes over time.
Time frame: compared to baseline and/or to the end of treatment) analyzed during follow up (13-24 months)
Change in NYHA class over time
Time frame: compared to baseline and/or to the end of treatment) analyzed during follow up (13-24 months)
Occurrence of adjudicated heart failure decompensation (hospitalization or ambulatory visit).
Time frame: analyzed during follow up (13-24 months)
Application of mechanical circulatory support (i.e. ECMO).
Time frame: assessed up to 24th month from the randomization
≥50% increase from the end of treatment in VEBs number in 48h Holter monitoring over time.
Time frame: assessed from the end of treatment up to 24th months from the randomization
≥50% increase from the end of treatment in nonsustained VT number in 48h Holter monitoring over time
Time frame: assessed from the end of treatment up to 24th months from the randomization
≥50% increase from the end of treatment in AF burden in 48h Holter monitoring over time
Time frame: assessed from the end of treatment up to 24th months from the randomization
Changes in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
Changes in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (reported in centimeters) over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Changes in dimensions of the heart cavities
Changes in dimensions of the heart cavities (ventricles and atria; reported in centimeters) over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Changes in volumes of the heart cavities
Changes in volumes of the heart cavities (ventricles and atria; reported in milliliters) over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Changes in thickness of left and right ventricles
Changes in thickness of left and right ventricles (reported in centimeters) over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Changes in tissue Doppler velocities (medial and lateral) of the mitral annulus
Tissue Doppler velocities (medial and lateral) of the mitral annulus (reported in centimeters per second) over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Changes in strain of heart cavities
Changes in strain of heart cavities (ventricles and atria; reported as a percentage) over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Changes in concentration of biomarkers of fibrosis and myocardial necrosis (troponin I, NT-proBNP) over time
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Changes in concentration of anti-heart autoantibodies (AHA) over time
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Change of patients' health status as assessed by the patients self-reported EQ-5D over time.
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Change in clinical summary score (heart failure symptoms and physical limitations domains) of KCCQ Questionnaire over time
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Pharmacoeconomic analysis based on questionnaires (SF-36, KCCQ, EQ-5D-5L, PGI, CGI, HCRU) and patient prognosis (including adverse event rates, hospitalizations, death, worsening of heart failure, arrhythmias, drug-related adverse events, change in LVEF and NYHA class, gain of QALY).
Time frame: assessed up to 24th months from the randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.