This is a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial that aim to verify the safety and the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive and motor symptoms in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC).
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by deposition of tau and motor, cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Since no effective treatment is available, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as tDCS, could be a valid complementary therapeutic approach. The tDCS modulates the spontaneous activity of the neural network by applying a direct current flow on the cortical brain areas (anodic or cathodic stimulation). Despite its efficacy in psychiatric disorders, the therapeutic use of tDCS in neurodegenerative diseases requires more systematic studies. The aim of this study is to verify the safety and efficacy of tDCS in PSP on motor, cognitive and behavioral symptoms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
24
tDCS is delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator thought a pair of saline soaked surface sponge electrodes. The active electrode (anode) is placed on the scalp over the left dlPFC (F3) according to the 10 to 20 international electroencephalogram coordinates) and the cathode is placed over the right deltoid muscle. During real stimulation a constant current of 2mA (milli Ampere) is applied for 20 minutes.
For the sham condition the electrode placement is the same of active tDCS but the electric current is ramped down 5 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation.
Centro per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEMAND) Dipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia, Sezione Neuroscienze, Università di Salerno
Salerno, Italy
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in verbal fluency task
fluency in verbal names
Time frame: Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Change from baseline to 3-month follow in motor symptoms as assessed with sensor recordings (OPAL system)
movements recorded with digital sensors (gait and other tasks)
Time frame: Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in cognitive symptoms as assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Cognitive status assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The cut off is 15,5. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 30. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in caregiver distress as assessed with Neuropshychiatric Inventory (NPI)
depression symptoms, apathy, neuropsychiatric symptoms assessed with Neuropshychiatric Inventory (NPI) . The minimum value of distress is 0 and the maximum is 5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in executive function as assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Executive function assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). The cut off is 13,4. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 18. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in attention as assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Attention assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). The cut off is 13,4. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 18. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in caregiver distress as assessed with Zarit Carer Burden Burden Interview (ZBI)
Caregiver distress assessed with Zarit Carer Burden Burden Interview (ZBI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 88. The cut off is 46. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)