The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcome of using direct esthetic composite restorations in managing MIH cases and the use of preformed metal crowns.
Molar incisor hypomineralization can represent a serious and challenging clinical management problem. Children with MIH require higher levels of treatment needs and demonstrate considerable management problems. For most severely affected MIH molars, direct esthetic restorative materials or preformed metal crowns will be the treatments to choose between. A number of aspects which could support decision-making, however, are not clearly demarcated. First and foremost, it is not clear if both treatments are similarly acceptable for patients and providers.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
30
Covering the affected molar with preformed metal crown cemented by glass ionomer lutting cement
Faculty of oral and dental medicine,Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
RECRUITINGPain after the restoration Binary (yes or no )
Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 month
Acceptability of the treatment Binary (yes or no )
Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 month
Restoration quality score index
(FDI criteria: criterion marginal adaptation
Time frame: 12 month
Health-related quality of life changes by the therapies
Measured as difference in child perceptions Questionnaire CPQ 8-10/11-14)
Time frame: 12 month
Prof.Dr.eman Elmasry, Prof.Dr.
CONTACT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.