The Study investigates a new product, sFilm-FS, aimed to help controlling body fluid leakage in general surgery procedures, proposing its use as an adjunct to hemostasis and/or sealing.
Many products have been developed as adjuncts to hemostasis in bleeding situations where traditional methods such as suture, clips or energy-based coagulation are ineffective or impractical. Many products are not as effective in the presence of active and/or brisk bleeding since the lack of sufficient adhesion strength allows forceful bleeding to simply "float" the products away from the bleeding tissue, prior to the achievement of full hemostasis. The Study investigates a new product, sFilm-FS, aimed to help the control of body fluid leakage in general surgery procedures, proposing its use as an adjunct to hemostasis and/or sealing.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
33
sFilm-FS is a sterile bio-compatible bio-absorbable patch embedded with lyophilized powders of Human Fibrinogen, Human Thrombin and calcium chloride.
TACHOSIL® is a fibrin sealant patch composed of an equine collagen patch coated with Human Fibrinogen and Human Thrombin.
Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, Department of Surgery
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH Barmherzige Schwestern
Linz, Austria
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Surgery Hepatobiliary Unit
Vienna, Austria
University Medical Center of Ljubljana, Division of Surgery
Ljubljana, Slovenia
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus an Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Surgery Through ...
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events AEs related to bleeding at TBS, thrombotic events, transfusion-related complications, post-operative adhesions (MRI assessment)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by measuring Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through Physical Examinations
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by physical examination: the detection of the number of patients with at least one clinical abnormality in different body areas (abdomen, eyes, skin, cardiovascular)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by urine analysis (pH)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Hemoglobin (g/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Detection of Antibodies Against Fibrinogen.
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by Measuring plasma levels of antibodies against human fibrinogen, by performing a screening assay using bridging ELISA based on polyclonal antibodies against human fibrinogen, which was developed with a sensitivity of 1000 ng/ml. Patients whose results were above 1000ng/ml control were considered positive.
Time frame: Last Follow-Up Visit (Visit 9)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by measuring Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by measuring Heart Rate (beats/minute)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by measuring Respiratory Rate (breaths/minute)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by measuring Body Temperature (°C)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by urine analysis (Specific Gravity (g/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by urine analysis (Presence of Glucose)
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Mean Cell Hemoglobin Concentration (g/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Mean Cell Hemoglobin (pg))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Mean Corpuscular Volume (fL))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Red Blood Cell (10\^12cells/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (White Blood Cell (10\^9cells/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Platelet (10\^9cells/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Fibrinogen (g/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (D-Dimer (microg/mL))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (mm/hr))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (C-Reactive Protein (mg/dL))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Blood Urea Nitrogen (mmol/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Creatinine (micromol/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Uric Acid (micromol/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Total Bilirubin (micromol/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Lactate Dehydrogenase (microkat/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase/Aspartate Aminotransferase (microkat/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase/Alanine Aminotransferase (microkat/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Gamma-GT (microkat/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Sodium (mmol/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Calcium (mmol/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Phosphorous (mmol/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Glucose (mmol/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Albumin (g/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Safety will be assessed from randomization of patients until the last follow-up visit by blood/coagulation parameters profiles analysis (Total Protein (g/L))
Time frame: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Proportion of Patients Achieving Hemostasis at TBS
Proportion of patients achieving hemostasis at TBS (absence of bleeding) at 2 (for sFilm-FS product only), 3, 5, 7 or 10 minutes following first product application, without the occurrence of re-bleeding, starting from 10 minutes after product application and until the completion of surgical closure
Time frame: Day of surgery
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Incidence of Re-treatment at the TBS
Incidence of re-treatment (one or more additional patch of sFilm-FS or TACHOSIL®) at the TBS at the different time points (2 for sFilm-FS, 3, 5, 7, 10 minutes from first product application)
Time frame: Day of surgery
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through the Percentage of Total Patients That Have Achieved Hemostasis
Percentage of total patients (patients that achieved hemostasis with a single patch application and patients that required additional patches) that have achieved hemostasis 10 minutes after first product application and therefore did not need to convert to standard of care treatment at the end of these 10 minutes
Time frame: Day of surgery
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure Through Incidence of Treatment Failure
Incidence of treatment failure, based on pre-defined treatment failure criteria (in case the bleeding at TBS (or re-bleeding) is still observed after 10 minutes following first application of study product; if hemostasis at TBS is achieved, but the Investigator decides that an additional treatment is required to ensure the durability of hemostasis; if there is a breakthrough bleeding requiring treatment other than the study product, at any time)
Time frame: Day of surgery
To Preliminarily Evaluate the Hemostatic Efficacy of sFilm-FS in Controlling Parenchymal Bleeding During Surgery, Related to Hemostasis and Treatment Failure.
Incidence of transfusion requirements in the 6 months follow-up period
Time frame: From surgery, up to 6 months