This study designed is compare the pulse response to the Valsalva maneuver between a photoplethysmography sensor (PPG) and non-invasive blood pressure sensor for the purpose of validating the PPG methodology in deriving a value for the Valsalva pulse response. The aim is to show that the PPG method captures the same phase responses as the blood pressure monitor and the primary outcome is the correlation between pulse amplitude ratios for the pulse at the end of the Valsalva to an average baseline pulse.
With both a photoplethysmography (PPG; Indicor, Vixiar Medical,. Baltimore, MD) and non-invasive blood pressure (Caretaker, Caretaker Medical, Charlottesville, VA) sensors in place on the index and middle fingers, respectively, each patient will be asked to perform three mild, 10-sec Valsalva maneuvers with at least 45 seconds between. Pulse recordings will be collected from each device to compare phases of the Valsalva pulse response including pulse amplitude changes and baseline movement. The primary outcome is the correlation between pulse amplitude ratios for the pulse at the end of the Valsalva to an average baseline pulse.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
121
Fort Norfolk Cardiology Associates
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
pulse amplitude ratio
The correlation between PPG-based and non-invasive blood pressure pulse amplitude ratio during a Valsalva maneuver.
Time frame: 5 minutes
Phases of valsalva pulse response
The agreement between PPG-based and non-invasive blood pressure pulse tracings during a Valsalva maneuver.
Time frame: 5 minuntes
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.