An early feasibility study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to treat severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and to gather preliminary data on its performance thereby providing guidance for future clinical development. The study is a single-arm registry with the last follow-up visit at 5 years post-intervention. The study will enroll up to 10 patients at up to 4 centers in North America.
Percutaneous approaches to treat MR promise to provide a sufficient reduction in MR without the risks typically associated with open heart surgery. Furthermore there is an unmet clinical need for patients with severe MR who are refused or denied surgery due to high risk. Percutaneous therapy provides a novel alternative treatment option for these patients with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality over and above current medical therapy. The Polares Medical PLAR Implant and Delivery System is a catheter-based technology designed to permanently implant a prosthesis using a transvenous / transseptal approach to augment the posterior mitral valve leaflet and improve coapatation of the mitral valve. Approved edge-to-edge repair has already been shown to be a viable alternative for high risk MR patients. However treatment with these devices is limited to specific anatomies and often requires multiple devices which increases clinical risk, adds to procedural time, and can result in residual MR. The PLAR Implant and Delivery System has been designed to overcome and mitigate some of these shortfalls.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1
Transvenous approach with a transeptal puncture to place the study device
Emory Midtown
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Incidence of all-cause mortality
Primary safety outcome
Time frame: 30-days
Incidence of change from baseline to moderate or less mitral regurgitation (Grade 2+ or less) as evaluated by 2D TTE
Primary performance endpoint
Time frame: 30-days
Rate of major safety events as defined by MVARC2
Secondary safety endpoint
Time frame: 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2 - 5 years post-intervention
Technical success per MVARC2 definitions
* Absence of procedure mortality * Successful access, delivery and retrieval of investigation delivery system * Successful deployment and correct positioning of intended implant(s) * Freedom from emergency surgery/re-intervention related to device or access procedure
Time frame: Technical success is measured at exit from OR
Procedure success per MVARC2 definitions
* Device success * Absence of major device or procedure-related serious adverse events as below: * Death * Stroke * Life-threatening bleed * Major vascular complication * Major cardiac structural complication * Stage 2 or 3 AKI * MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG * Shock, heart or respiratory failure requiring IV vasopressors, mechanical intervention or prolonged intubation * Valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention
Time frame: Procedure success is measured at 30 days post-intervention
Device success rate per MVARC2 definitions (all must be present for success)
* Absence of procedure mortality or stroke * Proper placement and positioning of device * Freedom from unplanned re-intervention related to device or access procedure * Continued intended safety and performance of the device: * No evidence of structural or functional failure * No device technical failure issues/complications * MR reduction to moderate or less without stenosis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Device success is measured at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2 - 5 years post-intervention
Patient success rate per MVARC2 definitions (all must be present for success)
* Device success * Patient returned to pre-procedure setting * No rehospitalization or reintervention for mitral regurgitation or heart failure * Functional improvement from baseline by one or more NYHA class * 6MWT improvement from baseline by 50 metres or more
Time frame: Patient success is measured at 12 months post-intervention