Although on an international level, accumulating evidence supports the feasibility and effectiveness of VR for pain and anxiety management, in Belgium, adoption of VR in clinical practice is limited and local trials are scarce. In order to improve translation from research to practice, the current study will focus on the feasibility, acceptability, tolerability and preliminary effectiveness of 'Relaxation-VR', a VR application aiming to reduce anxiety and pain for children admitted to hospital, as experienced by both patients and clinical staff. This study will take place at the paediatric wards of two hospitals interested in adopting this innovative technology for improving both patient care (e.g., anxiety and pain reduction) and staff workload (e.g., shorter procedure times), UZ Brussel and AZ Sint-Maarten.
Current pain and anxiety management for children in hospital includes pharmacological analgesia (e.g. opioid therapy) with potential negative side effects. In addition, a non-pharmacological approach involves various distraction techniques, either passive (e.g., music, movies) or active (e.g., interactive toys, electronic games, storytelling by the nursing staff). However, these distraction techniques can often be time consuming for the already busy and even over-demanded nursing staff. A combination of distraction, extinction learning, cognitive-behavioral principles, mindful meditation, stress reduction, gate-control theory, and the spotlight theory of attention is believed to be the mechanism behind VR's effectiveness in pain management. Accumulating evidence supports VR as a feasible and effective method to alleviate anxiety and pain for paediatric patients during lumbar punctures, intravenous injections, burn wound care and rehabilitation. In particular, a recent meta-analysis reported that the use of VR was significantly more effective in reducing pain (14 studies) and anxiety (7 studies) than care as usual (CAU), with large effect size. Moreover, for chest radiography, the use of VR has also significantly reduced procedure time, while increasing patient satisfaction. As such, adding the use of VR to standard pain and anxiety management methods might improve both effectiveness and efficiency of current practice. Although on an international level, accumulating evidence supports the feasibility and effectiveness of VR for pain and anxiety management, in Belgium, adoption of VR in clinical practice is limited and local trials are scarce. In order to improve translation from research to practice, the current study will focus on the feasibility, acceptability, tolerability and preliminary effectiveness of 'Relaxation-VR', a VR application aiming to reduce anxiety and pain for children admitted to hospital, as experienced by both patients and clinical staff. This study will take place at the paediatric wards of two hospitals interested in adopting this innovative technology for improving both patient care (e.g., anxiety and pain reduction) and staff workload (e.g., shorter procedure times), UZ Brussel and AZ Sint-Maarten.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
53
The VR intervention, Relaxation-VR, is a VR application developed by Psylaris aiming to reduce anxiety/stress and pain by distracting the patient in a relaxing environment. Relaxation-VR will be administered via a commercially available VR headset (Oculus Go). The VR headset is a piece of equipment that a person wears over their eyes that allows them to experience images and sounds produced by a computer as if they were part of real life (Cambridge Dictionary, 2020). As such, the patient is immersed in a novel, calming and distracting environment where the he/she is asked to perform tasks that will help the patients to relax when distressed before and/or during a medical procedure or during their stay in hospital. The Relaxation-VR application consists of three modules: two modules make use of relaxation principles (i.e. breathing exercises, meditation) and one module presents a scene with different interactive animations and objects (i.e. popping bubbles, playing fetch with a dog).
AZ Sint-Maarten
Mechelen, Antwerpen, Belgium
UZ Brussel
Jette, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
Tolerability: Do participants experience symptoms of simulator sickness? (Pediatric Simulator Sickness Questionnaire)
This questionnaire is based on the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) and is used to assess physical adverse events due to the VR intervention. The query language of the SSQ was simplified for children and modified Wong-Baker faces were added to create a Peds SSQ, with a score of 0 (happy face) indicating no adverse event and a score of 6 (unhappy face) indicating more severe adverse event. The Peds SSQ, in accordance with the SSQ, contains queries that probe four symptom categories: eye strain, head and neck discomfort, sleepiness or fatigue, and dizziness or nausea. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
Feasibility as assessed by the paediatric participants
Survey comprised of a combination of open-ended and response-set questions. Ease of use assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (very easy) to 100 (very difficult). Fun assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (A lot of fun to 100 (No fun at all).
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Acceptability as assessed by the paediatric participants (Would you use it again? Would you recommend it to others?)
Survey comprised of a combination of open-ended and response-set questions.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Feasibility as assessed by a parent of the paediatric patient
Survey comprised of a combination of open-ended and response-set questions. E.g. Did the child keep the VR-headset on during the entire procedure?
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Acceptability as assessed by a parent of the paediatric patient
Survey comprised of a combination of open-ended and response-set questions. E.g., Why did you want to try it? Would you use it again?
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Changes in anxiety levels from pre-to-post intervention session: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
A visual analogue scale (VAS) for anxiety will be used to assess the anxiety levels. The VAS is a 10-cm horizontal line marked with the words "not anxious" (0, low score) at the left end and "very anxious" (100, high score) at the right end, with different facial expressions drawn along the line. The VAS is a widely used scale which is reliable and valid for measuring the subjective feelings of children.
Time frame: Immediately before and after the intervention.
Changes in pain levels from pre-to-post intervention session: Faces Pain Rating Scale-Revised (FPRS-R)
The FPS-R is a self-report measure used to assess the intensity of children's pain and comprises a scale of 0-10 comprising six horizontally arranged cartoon faces with expressions of "0 = no pain" to "10 = very painful". Participants will be asked to indicate the face that illustrates how much pain he/she feels. The FPS-R is shown to be appropriate for use in assessment of the intensity of children's acute pain from age 4 onward. The FPS-R is a reliable and valid scale for evaluating pain in children
Time frame: Immediately before and after the intervention.
Changes in emotion (happiness and arousal/stress) levels from pre-to-post intervention session: Two items of the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM)
The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is a non-verbal pictorial assessment technique that directly measures the pleasure, arousal, (and dominance = item that is left out) associated with a person's affective reaction to a wide variety of stimuli. A continuum of five stylized human figures (manikins) depicts feeling very happy (score of 1) to very sad (score of 9). For arousal, a second continuum of five stylized manikins depicts feeling very calm (score of 1) to very tense (score of 9). SAM is an inexpensive, easy method for quickly assessing reports of affective response in many contexts.
Time frame: Immediately before and after the intervention.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.