EMDR Treatment in PTSD Following Cardiac Events

Overview

Cardiac events can often result in debilitating and persistent psychological symptoms. A key question involves whether optimal treatment of cardiac-induced posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) reduces PTSD symptoms and thereby may offset the risk of recurrent or worsening cardiovascular disease. Cardiac-induced PTSD 1) is prevalent, 2) features symptoms unique to internal ongoing somatic threat, with fears and worries that can be distinguished from PTSD resulting from external causes, 3) is persistent, 4) is associated with negative physical and emotional consequences, and 5) has not been the subject of randomized-controlled treatment trials (RCT). There is preliminary evidence suggesting that patients with cardiac-disease induced PTSD might particularly profit from EMDR. Nevertheless, this possibility has not been tested in cardiac-induced PTSD. Currently, patients with cardiac-induced PTSD are not routinely offered trauma-focused therapies, with a lack of scientific evidence likely being one major reason for this omission. If our proposed RCT shows that EMDR can be an effective treatment for patients with ACS-induced PTSD, EMDR could be routinely implemented as first-line treatment. The RCT outcomes might inform larger trials to test whether poor prognosis in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events can be improved through EMDR in patients with cardiac-induced PTSD.

There is a lack of research on the efficacy of psychotherapy and especially EMDR in clinical-induced PTSD. In the light of clinical-induced PTSD having different symptoms than traditional PTSD, this lack of research is highly problematic. Specifically, the unique symptom profile in clinical-induced PTSD related to the enduring somatic threat model was not addressed in any of the studies targeting PTSD in cardiac patients. In this regard, EMDR might be most promising: The EMDR protocol includes the assessment of body sensations associated with the target event, which is followed by reprocessing. The bilateral eye movements during reprocessing seem to have de-arousing effects and may thereby interrupt the positive feedback loop between cardiovascular sensations and anxiety-induced arousal as explained by the enduring somatic threat model. Hence, EMDR might be more suitable in cardiac PTSD patients compared to treatment protocols that motivates patients to keep focusing on the traumatic event such as Prolonged Exposure, where higher emotional involvement seems to be related to a better outcome. Therefore, the here proposed study aims at testing EMDR therapy in c,jj -induced PTSD in a randomized controlled trial.The here proposed study aims at testing EMDR therapy in ACS-induced PTSD in a randomized controlled trial. More specifically, the efficacy of the standardized trauma-focused procedure in terms of a reduced PTSD symptom level will be tested against a passive waitlist control group. Intervention group: The intervention group consists of 30 patients diagnosed with PTSD induced by cardiac events. Eight individual EMDR sessions lasting for 1 hours will be provided over 8 weeks by licensed EMDR therapists from the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Each EMDR session follows a standardized 8-phase protocol. As Shapiro posits that it is necessary to adapt the standard procedures to the unique needs and characteristics of the patient and to apply different EMDR protocols for different pathologies, the therapy for cardiac events was adapted from the standard protocol. Waiting control group: The intervention group consists of 30 patients diagnosed with PTSD induced by cardiac events. No intervention or any other procedure will be conducted during the study period of 36 weeks. Afterwards these subjects will be offered an EMDR therapy as provided in the intervention. Screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria prior to study inclusion: After discharge, survivors of a cardiac event will be informed about the study by a letter. The Screening will be conducted by phone and/or e-mail. Eligible participants will be screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Screening for a probable PTSD diagnosis will be conducted using Part III of the PCL-5 for DSM-5. Subjects who meet a total sum score of 28 or more, will be invited for Baseline a. Baseline a: Definitive inclusion, baseline measurements, randomization Assessment 1 consists of two appointments taking place at the University Hospital Zurich. During the first appointment, the CAPS-5 and the M.I.N.I will be administered in order to ascertain a PTSD and other psychiatric diagnoses. By means of the CAPS-5, it will be determined whether the participants have PTSD (inclusion criterion and baseline assessment of primary outcome). As the assessment of the traumatic event during the interview can cause distress (although only minimal and transient), which affects biomarkers, the assessment of cardiovascular biomarkers and stress sensitization by means of the loud-tone procedure will be carried out at a separate appointment. The second appointment (Baseline b) will be scheduled within 7 days after the first appointment to assess the baseline of all secondary endpoints: 1) saliva and blood samples will be collected to obtain, stress hormones, and cardiovascular biomarkers, including blood pressure; 2) the loud-tone procedure will be administered; 3) patient's medication will be documented. Moreover, the following information will be obtained from the potential participants or from hospital charts: Demographic factors, established cardiovascular risk factors and life style behavior, objective indices of myocardial damage and severity, variables related to patient referral to the coronary care unit, recurrent cardiac symptoms, recurrent hospitalizations, cardiac rehabilitation, doctor visits, pharmacological treatment, adherence to medication, medical comorbidities. Psychometric data will be collected by means of questionnaires. These questionnaires will be completed during the second appointment or from home via eCRF (Red Cap). Randomization: Participants will be randomized into either the intervention group (EMDR treatment) or the wait-list control group. Assessors who ascertain the primary outcome variable, i.e. CAPS scores, will be blind to the subject's treatment condition. Randomization will be conducted by a person outside of the study team. Intervention period: After randomization, the intervention (EMDR therapy) will be carried. Post Treatment and 6-months Follow-up (a/b): After the intervention (week 12), procedures of assessment 2 related to primary and secondary endpoints (i.e., CAPS, psychophysiological reactivity, psychometry, blood and saliva sampling) will be repeated. In order to test whether the effects of EMDR-treatment are long-lasting, measurements will be repeated at 6-months follow-up. Assessors who ascertain the primary outcome variable, i.e. CAPS scores, will be blind to the subject's treatment condition.