The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) combined with lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) compared to pembrolizumab alone (with placebo for lenvatinib) in treatment-naïve adults with no prior systemic therapy for their metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have a programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) greater than or equal to 1%. The primary study hypotheses are that: 1) the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is superior to pembrolizumab alone as assessed by Progression-free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1); and 2) the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is superior to pembrolizumab alone as assessed by Overall Survival (OS).
The main study will have a duration of approximately 5 years and the extension period will have a duration of approximately 1 year. The base study and the China extension to MK-7902-007 (NCT03829332) will enroll a total of approximately 120 Chinese participants. As of 30-Jul-2021, active participants, investigator, and sponsor personnel or delegate(s) involved in the treatment administration or clinical evaluation of the participants will be unblinded. Participants will discontinue lenvatinib and placebo, and participants who remain on treatment will receive open-label pembrolizumab only.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
107
Anhui Provincial Hospital ( Site 0108)
Hefei, Anhui, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University ( Site 0113)
Hefei, Anhui, China
Peking Union Medical College Hospital ( Site 0105)
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Beijing Cancer Hospital ( Site 0102)
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Beijing Chest Hospital Capital Medical University ( Site 0111)
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University ( Site 0115)
Changsha, Hunan, China
Hunan Cancer Hospital ( Site 0104)
Changsha, Hunan, China
Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University ( Site 0100)
Shanghai, Hunan, China
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital ( Site 0101)
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
The First Hospital of Jilin University ( Site 0110)
Changchun, Jilin, China
...and 7 more locations
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Data were from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. PFS as assessed by BICR per RECIST 1.1 was presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 18 months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death from any cause.
Time frame: Up to approximately 18 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1. The percentage of participants who experienced CR or PR as assessed by BICR were presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 18 months
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The number of participants who experienced an AE were reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 52 months
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE were reported
Time frame: Up to approximately 30 months
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Combined Global Health Status / Quality of Life (Items 29 & 30) Scale Combined Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding Global Health Status (GHS; "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) is computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score was presented.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 21
Change From Baseline in Cough (EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer Module 13 [QLQ-LC13] Item 31) Score
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific supplemental questionnaire used in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Participant responses to the question "How much did you cough?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The change from baseline in cough (EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31) score will be presented. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 21
Change From Baseline in Chest Pain (EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40) Score
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer-specific supplemental questionnaire used in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Participant responses to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The change from baseline in chest pain (EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40) score was reported. A lower score indicated a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 21
Change From Baseline in Dyspnea (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8) Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question "Were you short of breath?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The change from baseline in dyspnea (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8) score was reported. A lower score indicated a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 21
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. Per protocol, the change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score was presented.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 21
Time to True Deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-C30 Combined Global Health Status /Quality of Life (Items 29 & 30) Scale Combined Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions on GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall QoL during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) was computed by averaging raw scores of the 2 items and applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in GHS-QoL combined score. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Time to True Deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-LC13 Cough (Item 31) Scale Score
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific questionnaire. Participant responses to the question: "How much did you cough?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0-100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in cough (Item 31). A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Time to True Deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-LC13 Chest Pain (Item 40) Scale Score
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific questionnaire. Participant responses to the question: "Have you had pain in your chest?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0-100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in cough (Item 40). A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Time to True Deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea (Item 8) Scale Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question: "Were you short of breath?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in dyspnea (Item 8). A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Time to True Deterioration (TTD) in the Composite Endpoint of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Cough (Item 31), EORTC QLQ-LC13 Chest Pain (Item 40), or EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea (Item 8)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the QoL of cancer patients, including a single-item scale score for dyspnea (Item 8; score range:1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Used in combination with QLQ-C30, the EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a supplemental lung cancer-specific module, including a single-item scale score for cough (Item 31; score range:1=Not at All to 4=Very Much ) and chest pain (Item 40, score range: 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 31, 40 and 8 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. The TTD in the composite endpoint of EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 31, EORTC QLQ-LC13 Item 40, EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8 scale score was presented, defined as the time to first onset of a ≥10point decrease from baseline in anyone of the three scale items. A longer TTD indicates better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
Time to True Deterioration (TTD) Based on Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in physical functioning (Items 1 to 5). A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to approximately 25 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.