An early feasibility study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to treat severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and to gather preliminary data on its performance thereby providing guidance for future clinical development. The study is a single-arm registry with the last follow-up visit at 5 years post-intervention. The study will enroll up to 10 patients at one (1) center in Brazil.
Percutaneous approaches to treat MR promise to provide a sufficient reduction in MR without the risks typically associated with open heart surgery. Furthermore there is an unmet clinical need for patients with severe MR who are refused or denied surgery due to high risk. Percutaneous therapy provides a novel alternative treatment option for these patients with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality over and above current medical therapy. The Polares Medical PLAR Implant and Delivery System is a catheter-based technology designed to permanently implant a prosthesis using a transvenous / transseptal approach to augment the posterior mitral valve leaflet and improve coaptation with the anterior leaflet. Approved edge-to-edge repair has already been shown to be a viable alternative for high risk MR patients. However treatment with these devices is limited to specific anatomies and often requires multiple devices which increases clinical risk, adds to procedural time, and can result in residual MR. The PLAR Implant and Delivery System has been designed to overcome and mitigate some of these shortfalls.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
10
The PLAR Implant is placed mitral valve posterior annulus using its delivery system via femoral vein access and a transeptal puncture
Incidence of all-cause mortality following treatment with the PLAR Implant and Delivery System
Primary safety outcome
Time frame: 30-days follow-up
Incidence of change from severe mitral regurgitation at baseline (Grade 3+ or more) to moderate or less mitral regurgitation (Grade 2+ or less) following treatment with the PLAR Implant and Delivery System as evaluated by 2D TTE
Primary performance endpoint
Time frame: 30-days follow-up
Rate of major safety events as defined by MVARC2 definitions
Secondary safety endpoint
Time frame: Follow-up at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Technical success rate per MVARC2 definitions
All of the following must be present for technical success: * Absence of procedure mortality * Successful access, delivery and retrieval of investigation delivery system * Successful deployment and correct positioning of intended implant(s) * Freedom from emergency surgery/re-intervention related to device or access procedure
Time frame: Technical success is measured immediately following the procedure
Procedure success rate per MVARC2 definitions
Both of the following must be present for procedure success: * Device success * Absence of major device or procedure-related serious adverse events as below: * Death * Stroke * Life-threatening bleed * Major vascular complication * Major cardiac structural complication * Stage 2 or 3 AKI * MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG * Shock, heart or respiratory failure requiring IV vasopressors, mechanical intervention or prolonged intubation * Valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention
Time frame: Procedure success is measured at 30 days follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Device success rate per MVARC 2 definitions
All of the following must be present for device success: * Absence of procedure mortality or stroke * Proper placement and positioning of device * Freedom from unplanned re-intervention related to device or access procedure * Continued intended safety and performance of the device as below: * No evidence of structural or functional failure * No device technical failure issues/complications * MR reduction to moderate or less without stenosis
Time frame: Device success is measured at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years follow-up
Patient success rate per MVARC2 definitions
All of the following must be present for patient success: * Device success * Patient returned to pre-procedure setting * No rehospitalization or reintervention for mitral regurgitation or heart failure • Functional improvement from baseline by one or more NYHA class * 6MWT improvement from baseline by 50 metres or more
Time frame: Patient success is measured at 12 months follow-up