The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different brolucizumab 6 mg dosing regimens in patients with visual impairment due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who have previously received anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment.
This study was a 52-week randomized, open-label, multi-center, two-arm study for pretreated patients with suboptimal anatomically controlled nAMD. Patients who consented were screened to evaluate eligibility. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two treatment arms: * Brolucizumab 6 mg "loading arm": 1 loading injection every 4 weeks for 3 consecutive injections (baseline, weeks 4 and 8) followed by an injection every 12 weeks. * Brolucizumab 6 mg "non-loading arm": one initial injection followed by an injection every 12 weeks There were three periods in this study: * Screening period: from day -14 to baseline * Open-label treatment period: from baseline (day 1) to week 48 * Post-treatment follow-up period: from week 48 to week 52 In both study arms, treatment intervals after the initiation phase were either 8 weeks or 12 weeks depending on disease activity status. More frequent injections, i.e., treatment intervals of \< 8 weeks were not allowed after the initiation phase.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
52
Intravitreal injection
Novartis Investigative Site
Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
Week 40 to Week 52: LS Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score between 78 and 23 ETDRS letters (inclusive) at Screening and Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40 to Week 52
Treatment Intervals Before and During the Study
Treatment interval distribution. Treatment interval during the study, within 24 weeks prior to baseline and interval between the last 2 injections in the study. In the loading arm, data from the loading period was excluded.
Time frame: -24 Weeks, Baseline, Week 52
Number of Patients With Prolonged Interval
Treatment interval distribution. Prolongation was calculated by comparing the mean treatment interval in last 24 weeks prior to first brolucizumab injection (a) with the mean of the average treatment interval during the study (loading phase excluded in the loading arm) and (b) with the last treatment interval during the study. Patients with only 1 injection during the treatment period were calculated as non-responders (no prolon-gation).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Proportion of Patients Who Maintained on q12w Regimen.
Treatment interval distribution up to Week 52. Proportion of patients maintained on q12w treatment frequency in the two brolucizumab groups up to week 52. Patients who discontinued treatment before week 52 were rated as non-responders, i.e., as patients who did not maintain the q12w regimen. In the loading arm, the loading period up to week 12 was not considered in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to week 52
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Homburg, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Lübeck, Germany
...and 9 more locations
Distribution of Patients at Every 8 Weeks / Every 12 Weeks Intervals - Frequency of Switches in Treatment Intervals Between Baseline and Week 52
Treatment interval distribution
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Mean Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score between 78 and 23 ETDRS letters (inclusive) at Screening and Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16 to 28, Week 52
Number of Patients With Best-corrected Visual Acuity Improvements of >= 5, >= 10 and >= 15 Letters
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score between 78 and 23 ETDRS letters (inclusive) at Screening and Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 52
Number of Patients With Best-corrected Visual Acuity >= 69 Letters
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score between 78 and 23 ETDRS letters (inclusive) at Screening and Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, up to Week 52
LS Mean Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at Week 52
BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score between 78 and 23 ETDRS letters (inclusive) at Screening and Baseline in the study eye were included. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change in Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28 and 52
Change in central subfield thickness was measured by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28 and 52
Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Central Subfield
Change in fluids was measured by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks from baseline up to Week 52
Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Central Subfield
Change in fluids was measured by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks from baseline up to Week 52
Absence of Sub-retinal Pigment Epithelium Fluid in the Central Subfield
Change in fluids was measured by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Time frame: Every 4 weeks from baseline up to Week 52
Presence of Active Choroidal Neovascularization Leakage
Presence of active choroidal neovascularization leakage was measured by Fluorescein angiography. CNV = choroidal neovascularization; MNV = macular neovascularization
Time frame: At Week 52
Overview of TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory findings), symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. Treatment-emergent AEs are AEs that developed on or after first study treatment administration, or any event previously present that worsened following exposure to the study treatment.
Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 52 weeks.
Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye by Primary System Organ Class
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory findings), symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. Treatment-emergent AEs are AEs that developed on or after first study treatment administration, or any event previously present that worsened following exposure to the study treatment.
Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 52 weeks.
Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye by Preferred Term (at Least 5% in Any Group)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory findings), symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. Treatment-emergent AEs are AEs that developed on or after first study treatment administration, or any event previously present that worsened following exposure to the study treatment.
Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 52 weeks.
Non-ocular TEAEs - Total
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory findings), symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. Treatment-emergent AEs are AEs that developed on or after first study treatment administration, or any event previously present that worsened following exposure to the study treatment.
Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 52 weeks.
Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye of Moderate or Severe Intensity
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory findings), symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. Treatment-emergent AEs are AEs that developed on or after first study treatment administration, or any event previously present that worsened following exposure to the study treatment.
Time frame: Adverse events are reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 52 weeks.