The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efavaleukin alfa in subjects with active systemic lupus erythematosus.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
168
Administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection.
Administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection.
Standard of care procedures and therapies for managing active systemic lupus erythematosus will be carried out according to each investigator's standard procedures.
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) Response at Week 52
A participant achieved an SRI-4 response if all the following criteria were met: * ≥ 4-point reduction from baseline in Hybrid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (hSLEDAI) score (scale 0-105, with higher scores indicating more disease activity). * No new British-Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A score and no \> 1 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with baseline. The BILAG index evaluates disease activity in 9 separate organ systems. Each of the organ systems are allocated an alphabetical score of A (most active), B (moderate activity), C (minor activity), D (stable) or E (never present). * \< 0.3-points deterioration from baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) visual analogue (VAS) score (scale 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease). Participants were considered non-responders for using more than protocol-permitted therapies.
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved a BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) Response at Week 52
A participant achieved a BICLA response if all the following criteria were met: * At least 1 gradation of improvement in baseline BILAG domain scores in all body systems with moderate or severe disease activity at entry and no \> 1 BILAG B domain scores compared with baseline. The BILAG index evaluates disease activity in 9 separate organ systems. Each of the organ systems are allocated an alphabetical score of A (most active), B (moderate activity), C (minor activity), D (stable) or E (never present). * No worsening of the hSLEDAI score from baseline (scale 0-105, with higher scores indicating more disease activity). * \< 0.3-points deterioration from baseline in PGA VAS (scale 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease). * No initiation of non-protocol treatment.
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) Response at Week 52
A participant achieved an LLDAS response if all the following criteria were met: * hSLEDAI ≤ 4 (scale 0-105, higher scores indicating more disease activity) with no activity in major organ systems (renal \[proteinuria, hematuria, pyuria, urinary casts\], central nervous system \[seizure, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, cranial nerve disorder, cerebrovascular accident\], cardiopulmonary \[pericarditis, pleurisy\], vasculitis and fever) \& no hemolytic anemia or gastrointestinal activity in BILAG. The BILAG index evaluates disease activity in 9 separate organ systems. Each of the organ systems are allocated an alphabetical score of A (most active) to E (never present). * No new lupus disease activity compared with previous assessment defined as no new descriptor scores in hSLEDAI. * A score of \< 1 in PGA VAS score (scale 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease). * Current prednisolone dose ≤ 7.5 mg daily. * No increase or initiation of immunosuppressive drugs.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Alabama at Birmingham,Arthritis Clinical Intervention Program
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates PC
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Arizona Arthritis And Rheumatology Associates PC
Glendale, Arizona, United States
Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates PC
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Loma Linda University Health Care
Loma Linda, California, United States
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California Irvine
Orange, California, United States
Robin K Dore MD Inc
Tustin, California, United States
Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease Specialties
Aventura, Florida, United States
Life Clinical Trials
Aventura, Florida, United States
...and 140 more locations
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants With a Reduction of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) to ≤ 7.5 mg/Day by Week 44 and Sustained Through Week 52 in Participants With a Baseline OCS Dose ≥ 10 mg/Day
Participants taking OCS could begin tapering OCS after the Week 12 assessment up to the Week 44 assessment with initiation of tapering based upon clinical judgement of the treating physician. The tapering schedule was at the discretion of the investigator but should not have been tapered more than 20% of the prior dose per week. Tapering OCS before Week 12 was not encouraged but may have been allowed based upon investigator's judgement. Between weeks 44 and 52, the OCS dosing must again have remained stable.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved a SRI-4 Response at Week 24
A participant achieved an SRI-4 response if all the following criteria were met: * ≥ 4-point reduction from baseline in hSLEDAI score (scale 0-105, with higher scores indicating more disease activity). * No new BILAG A score and no \> 1 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with baseline. The BILAG index evaluates disease activity in 9 separate organ systems. Each of the organ systems are allocated an alphabetical score of A (most active), B (moderate activity), C (minor activity), D (stable) or E (never present). * \< 0.3-points deterioration from baseline in PGA VAS score (scale 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease). Participants were considered non-responders for using more than protocol-permitted therapies.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a BICLA Response at Week 24
A participant achieved a BICLA response if all the following criteria were met: * At least 1 gradation of improvement in baseline BILAG domain scores in all body systems with moderate or severe disease activity at entry and no \> 1 BILAG B domain scores compared with baseline. The BILAG index evaluates disease activity in 9 separate organ systems. Each of the organ systems are allocated an alphabetical score of A (most active), B (moderate activity), C (minor activity), D (stable) or E (never present). * No worsening of the hSLEDAI score from baseline (scale 0-105, with higher scores indicating more disease activity). * \< 0.3-points deterioration from baseline in PGA VAS (scale 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease). * No initiation of non-protocol treatment.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With a hSLEDAI Response at Week 24 and Week 52
The hSLEDAI is a global index that evaluates disease activity and includes both laboratory and clinical parameters. The score ranges from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. A participant achieved a hSLEDAI response if there was a ≥ 4-point reduction in hSLEDAI from baseline.
Time frame: Week 24 and Week 52
Number of Participants With an Improvement From Baseline in Tender and Swollen Joint Count ≥ 50% at Weeks 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52 in Participants With ≥ 6 Tender and Swollen Joints in Hands and Wrists
The swollen and tender join count assessments were performed at the site by an experienced independent and blinded joint evaluator. Joints in hands and wrists were scored for the simultaneous presence (1) or absence (0) of swelling and tenderness. Scores ranged from 0-28. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Time frame: Weeks 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Number of Participants With an Improvement From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Area and Severity Index (CLASI) Activity Score ≥ 50% at Week 8, 12, 24, 36, and 52 in Participants With a CLASI Activity Score ≥ 8 at Baseline
The CLASI consists of 2 scores, the first summarizes the activity of the disease while the second is a measure of the damage done by the disease. Activity is scored based on erythema, scale/hyperkeratosis, mucous membrane involvement, acute hair loss and non-scarring alopecia. The total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Time frame: Weeks 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Annualized Flare Rate Over 52 Weeks
A flare was defined as a BILAG score designation of "worse" or "new" resulting in a B score in ≥ 2 organs or an A score in ≥ 1 organ. The BILAG index evaluates disease activity in 9 separate organ systems. Each of the organ systems are allocated an alphabetical score of A (most active), B (moderate activity), C (minor activity), D (stable) or E (never present). The annualized flare rate was calculated as the number of flares divided by the flare exposure time in days multiplied by 365.25.
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Standardized Score Using the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form (SF) 7a Instrument at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The PROMIS Fatigue SF 7a assesses the experience of fatigue as well as its impact on physical, mental and social activities. The score ranges from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating more fatigue. A negative change from baseline indicates a reduction in fatigue. Efficacy data collected after the study termination decision date were censored and excluded from analyses for that particular visit.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Physical Component Score of the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 Questionnaire Version 2 (SF-36V2) at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Physical Functioning Domain Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Social Role Functioning Domain Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Physical Role Functioning Domain Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Bodily Pain Domain Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Mental Health Domain Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Emotional Role Domain Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Vitality Domain Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the General Health Domain Score of the SF-36V2 at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The SF-36v2 contains 36 items and yields assessments of 8 domains of health-related quality of life: 1. Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2. Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. 3. Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. 4. Bodily pain. 5. General mental health (psychological distress and well-being). 6. Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. 7. Vitality (energy and fatigue). 8. General health perceptions. The scores from the 8 domains will be evaluated independently and aggregated into 2 norm-based summary component measures of physical and mental health. The recall period is the past 7 days. The score ranges from 0-100 for the summary components and for each domain, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Physical Health Domain Score of the Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The LupusQoL is a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-specific health-related QoL instrument and consists of 8 domains: 1. Physical health. 2. Pain. 3. Planning. 4. Intimate relationships. 5. Burden to others. 6. Emotional health. 7. Body image. 8. Fatigue. The score for each domain ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Pain Domain Score of the LupusQoL at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health-related QoL instrument and consists of 8 domains: 1. Physical health. 2. Pain. 3. Planning. 4. Intimate relationships. 5. Burden to others. 6. Emotional health. 7. Body image. 8. Fatigue. The score for each domain ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Planning Domain Score of the LupusQoL at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health-related QoL instrument and consists of 8 domains: 1. Physical health. 2. Pain. 3. Planning. 4. Intimate relationships. 5. Burden to others. 6. Emotional health. 7. Body image. 8. Fatigue. The score for each domain ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Intimate Relationship Domain Score of the LupusQoL at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health-related QoL instrument and consists of 8 domains: 1. Physical health. 2. Pain. 3. Planning. 4. Intimate relationships. 5. Burden to others. 6. Emotional health. 7. Body image. 8. Fatigue. The score for each domain ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Burden to Others Domain Score of the LupusQoL at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health-related QoL instrument and consists of 8 domains: 1. Physical health. 2. Pain. 3. Planning. 4. Intimate relationships. 5. Burden to others. 6. Emotional health. 7. Body image. 8. Fatigue. The score for each domain ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Emotional Health Domain Score of the LupusQoL at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health-related QoL instrument and consists of 8 domains: 1. Physical health. 2. Pain. 3. Planning. 4. Intimate relationships. 5. Burden to others. 6. Emotional health. 7. Body image. 8. Fatigue. The score for each domain ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Body Image Domain Score of the LupusQoL at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health-related QoL instrument and consists of 8 domains: 1. Physical health. 2. Pain. 3. Planning. 4. Intimate relationships. 5. Burden to others. 6. Emotional health. 7. Body image. 8. Fatigue. The score for each domain ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Domain Score of the LupusQoL at Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
The LupusQoL is a SLE-specific health-related QoL instrument and consists of 8 domains: 1. Physical health. 2. Pain. 3. Planning. 4. Intimate relationships. 5. Burden to others. 6. Emotional health. 7. Body image. 8. Fatigue. The score for each domain ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
A TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant irrespective of a causal relationship with the study treatment and had emerged or worsened during treatment. A serious TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, met at least 1 of the following criteria: * Resulted in death (fatal). * Was immediately life-threatening. * Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. * Was any other medically important serious event. Clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory values and vital signs were also recorded as TEAEs.
Time frame: Day 1 to Week 56
Serum Efavaleukin Alfa Concentrations by Timepoint
Serum efavaleukin alfa concentrations by timepoint after multiple dose subcutaneous administration of efavaleukin alfa to participants with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Lower limit of quantification= 0.100 ng/mL.
Time frame: Day 1: 6-24 and 48-96 hrs, Day 29, Day 43: 6-24 and 48-96 hrs, Day 85, Day 169, Day 253, Day 309, and Day 365