The SAVE-MORE is a pivotal, confirmatory, phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT) aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early start of anakinra guided by suPAR in patients with LRTI by SARS-CoV-2 in improving the clinical state of COVID-19 over 28 days as measured by the ordinal scale of the 11-point World Health Organization (WHO) clinical progression scale (CPS).
Since March 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic started in Europe, the Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis has launched in Greece the SAVE clinical trial (suPAR-guided Anakinra treatment for Validation of the risk and Early management of severe respiratory failure by COVID-19) (EudraCT number 2020-001466-11; approval 38/20 of the National Ethics Committee of Greece, approval IS 028/20 of the National Organization for Medicine of Greece, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04357366). The concept of the SAVE trial was that early recognition of the risk for the progression of patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 into severe respiratory failure (SRF) may guide anakinra therapy to prevent SRF. The tool that was used for the diagnosis of risk for SRF is the biomarker suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) at measurable concentrations in the blood ≥6 ng/ml. The trial was designed to be open-label non-randomized and the idea was το the start of treatment well before any sign of respiratory failure emerges. Patients hospitalized at tertiary hospitals during the same time period as the SAVE trial was ongoing and who were receiving the same standard-of-care (SOC) treatment were studied as comparators. An interim analysis was submitted to the National Organization for Medicines; number 108002/23.10/2020. In this interim analysis, 130 patients receiving anakinra treatment and SOC were analysed and they were compared to 130 patients receiving SOC. The 130 SOC parallel comparators were selected by propensity score matching to be fully matched to the anakinra-treated patients for age, comorbidities, severity scores on the day of hospital admission, i.e. APACHE II score, Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and WHO severity, and for the intake of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine and dexamethasone. SRF was defined as any respiratory ratio (pO2/FiO2) less than 150 mmHg necessitating mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation (NIV). The results of this analysis may be summarized as follows: * The incidence of SRF was significantly decreased from 59.2% in the parallel standard-of-care (SOC) comparators (n= 130) to 22.3% among the 130 anakinra-treated patients; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence intervals 0.20-0.46; P: 4.6 x 10-8. * 30-day mortality was decreased from 22.3% in the SOC comparators to 11.5% among anakinra-treated patients; hazard ratio 0.49; 95% confidence intervals 0.25-0.97%; P: 0.041. * Duration of stay at the intensive care unit was shortened with anakinra treatment compared to the SOC comparators for the patients who eventually developed SRF * The median cost of hospitalization was significantly reduced from €2.398,40 among SOC comparators to €1.291,40 among anakinra-treated patients * No safety concerns were raised.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
606
Comparison of the distribution of frequencies of each score of a 5-scale patient state evaluated from the 11-point WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment
Comparison of the distribution of frequencies of each score of the 5-scale patient state evaluated from the 11-point WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment by Day 28. This will be expressed as the distribution of the frequencies of each score of the scale in each arm of treatment by Day 28. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 28 days
Absolute change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS)
Comparison of the absolute change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 28 days
Relative change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS)
Comparison of the relative change (%) of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 28 days
Absolute change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS)
Comparison of the absolute change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression nordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
Time frame: 14 days
Relative change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS)
Comparison of the relative (%) change of the measure of the 11-point of WHO Clinical Progression ordinal Scale (CPS) between the two arms of treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (best outcome-asymptomatic) to 11 (worst outcome-death).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis
Alexandroupoli, Greece
10th Department of Pulmonary Medicine, SOTIRIA General Hospital of Chest Diseases of Athens
Athens, Greece
1st Department of Internal Medicine, AMALIA FLEMING Prefecture General Hospital of Melissia
Athens, Greece
1st Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Athens KORGIALENIO-BENAKIO E.E.S.
Athens, Greece
1st Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Eleusis THRIASIO
Athens, Greece
1st Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Nea Ionia CONSTANTOPOULIO-PATISION
Athens, Greece
1st Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Voula ASKLEPIEIO
Athens, Greece
1st University Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Athens LAIKO
Athens, Greece
1st University Department of Pulmonary Medicine, SOTIRIA General Hospital of Chest Diseases of Athens
Athens, Greece
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Eleusis THRIASIO
Athens, Greece
...and 30 more locations
Time frame: 14 days
Absolute change of the SOFA score
Comparison of the absolute change of the SOFA score (in points) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 14 days
Relative change of the SOFA score
Comparison of the relative (%) change of the SOFA score (in points) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 14 days
Absolute change of the SOFA score
Comparison of the absolute change of the SOFA score between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Relative change of the SOFA score
Comparison of the relative (%) change of the SOFA score between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Time until hospital discharge
Comparison of the time until hospital discharge between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Time until discharge from the intensive care unit
Comparison of the time until discharge from the intensive care unit between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Comparison of the rate of serious and non-serious adverse events between the two arms of treatment
Comparison of the rate of serious and non-serious adverse events between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 90 days
Comparison of the rate of serious and non-serious adverse events between the two arms of treatment
Comparison of the rate of serious and non-serious adverse events between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 60 days
Relative changes of circulating concentrations of suPAR (μg/liter), D-dimers (μg/liter), ferritin (μg/liter), and Interleukin-6 (μg/liter) by Day 7 from baseline Day 1
Comparison of the relative changes of circulating concentrations of suPAR (μg/liter),D-dimers (μg/liter), ferritin (μg/liter), and Interleukin-6 (μg/liter) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Relative changes of circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein (mg/liter) by Day 7 from baseline Day 1
Comparison of the relative changes of circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein (mg/liter) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Relative changes of circulating concentrations of suPAR (μg/liter),D-dimers (μg/liter), ferritin (μg/liter), and Interleukin-6 (μg/liter) by Day 4 from baseline Day 1
Comparison of the relative changes of circulating concentrations of suPAR (μg/liter),D-dimers (μg/liter), ferritin (μg/liter), and Interleukin-6 (μg/liter) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
Relative changes of circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein (mg/liter) by Day 4 from baseline Day 1
Comparison of the relative changes of circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein (mg/liter) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
Absolute change of the viral load by Day 7 from baseline Day 1
Comparison of the absolute change of the viral load (in copies) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Relative change of the viral load by Day 7 from baseline Day 1
Comparison of the relative (%) change of the viral load between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Absolute change of the viral load by Day 4 from baseline Day 1
Comparison of the absolute change of the viral load (in copies) between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
relative change of the viral load by Day 4 from baseline Day 1
Comparison of the relative change (%) of the viral load between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 4 days
Transcriptomic analysis
Expression of messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) will be compared between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days
Proteomic analysis
Protein composition will be compared between the two arms of treatment
Time frame: 7 days