This is a single arm, open label, multi centre phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and long term safety of lomitapide in paediatric patients with HoFH receiving stable lipid lowering therapy (LLT) (including lipoprotein apheresis (LA), when applicable) comprising of the following phases: * Screening Period (starting at Week 12, i.e. ≤12 weeks prior to Baseline for up to 6 weeks) * Stratified Enrolment and Start of Run in Period (starting at minimum at Week 6, i.e., 6 weeks prior to Baseline for a minimum of 6 weeks): * Efficacy Phase (starting at Baseline, i.e. Day \[D\] 0 for 24 weeks±3 days * Safety Phase (starting at Week 24±3 days for 80±1 weeks)
Lomitapide has been approved for use in adult patients with HoFH in the European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA), United States of America (USA), Israel, Argentina, Canada, Colombia, and Japan. This study is designed to determine if lomitapide is effective and can be safely administered to paediatric patients with HoFH. If the efficacy and safety so far observed in adults is confirmed in paediatric patients, the potential exists to significantly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in paediatric patients with HoFH. Furthermore, the lower LDL-C levels may reduce atherosclerosis progression and would be expected to benefit these paediatric patients with HoFH. A single arm, non comparator design has been selected due to the rarity of the disease and because the evaluation of safety variables such as growth and sexual maturation requires longer term observation than would be feasible in the context of a placebo controlled study. To mitigate the disadvantages of a single arm design, the study includes a Run in Period of at least 6 weeks during which current lipid lowering therapy (LLT) (including lipoprotein apheresis (LA), when applicable) will be stabilised to establish baseline levels allowing each patient to serve as his/her own control. Patients will also remain on stable LLT (including LA, when applicable) during the Efficacy Phase of the study through Week 24±3 days.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
46
2mg,5mg, 10mg and 20mg capsules
Universtiats-Kinderlinik Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
University Hospital of Cologne
Cologne, Germany
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
Chaim Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, Israel
U.O.C. Clinica Medica 1
Padua, Padua, Italy
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital,
Roma, Italy
King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre (KAIMRC),
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
King Faisal Specialist Hospital
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Hospital Universitari Sant Joan
Reus, Tarragona,, Spain
Hospital Abente y Lago
A Coruña, Spain
...and 2 more locations
Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL C) at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL C) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24 for Various Lipid Parameters
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change of the following lipid parameters at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD): * Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) * Total cholesterol (TC) * Very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) * Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) * TG (Triglycerides)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24 for Lp(a)
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Lp(a) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for LDL-C
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in LDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Non-HDL-C
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Non-HDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for TC
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TC at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for VLDL-C
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in VLDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Apo B
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in apo B at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for TG
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TG at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a))
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Lp(a) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
Percent Change in TC/HDL-C Ratio From Baseline at All Other Time Points to Week 104
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TC/HDL-C ratio at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
Percent Change in HDL-C From Baseline at All Other Time Points to Week 104
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in HDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104 week
Change in LLT From Week 28 Through Week 104
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the change in background lipid lowering therapy
Time frame: Week 28 through Week 104
Change in LA From Week 28 Through Week 104
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the change in lipoprotein apheresis
Time frame: Week 28 through Week 104
Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Recommended Target (2013) of LDL-C at Any Timepoint Between Baseline and Week 24
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the number and percentage of patients achieving EAS recommended target (2013) of LDL-C
Time frame: Baseline through Week 24
Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving EAS Recommended Target (2013) of LDL-C at Any Time in the Study
To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the number and percentage of patients achieving EAS recommended target (2013) of LDL-C
Time frame: Baseline through Week 104
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.