The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cellgram-LC in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is Cellgram-LC superior to best supportive care (BSC) in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis? * What medical problems do participants have after receiving Cellgram-LC compared with BSC? Participants will: * Receive a single dose of Cellgram-LC at Week 0 or receive best supportive care according to their assigned study group. * Attend clinic visits for scheduled assessments at Week 4 and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24. * Complete scheduled telephone follow-up at Months 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15, 21, 27, 30, 33, and 36. * Be followed for transplant-free survival and other study outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
200
Participants receive a single injection of 7 × 10\^7 autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cellgram-LC) through the hepatic artery.
Participants receive best supportive care.
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan, South Korea
RECRUITINGSoonchunhyang University Hospital
Bucheon-si, South Korea
RECRUITINGSoonchunhyang University Hospital
Cheonan, South Korea
TERMINATEDGangwon National University Hospital
Chuncheon, South Korea
TERMINATEDHallym Univ. Medical Center
Chuncheon, South Korea
RECRUITINGGangneung Asan Hospital
Gangneung-si, South Korea
RECRUITINGEunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
RECRUITINGGangnam Severance Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
RECRUITINGKorea University Anam Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
RECRUITINGSeoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
RECRUITING...and 5 more locations
Transplant free survival (TFS)
Transplant free survival (TFS), the median survival time and 95% confidence interval for each group were presented using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in the survival distribution between the two groups was used as a Cox proportional hazards model corrected for stratification Black.
Time frame: For 3 years
Survival rate
For the survival rate, the survival rate and 95% confidence interval at each time point are presented using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in survival rate between the two groups is tested using the Z statistic.
Time frame: month 24 and 36
Change amount of Child-Pugh score
In order to compare the difference between groups in the amount of change in each evaluation variable at the time of visit after cell administration/best supportive therapy compared to the baseline value, covariance analysis (ANCOVA) is performed by setting the baseline time point and stratification factor as a correction variable for each evaluation variable. CP score was calculated using five factors: hepatic encephalopathy, prothrombin time, bilirubin, serum albumin, and ascites, and the score range was 5-15 points. In the Child-Pugh grade, scores of the five factors are summed and evaluated as A if it is less than 7 points, B if it is 7-9, and C if it exceeds 9 points.
Time frame: week -6 and 0
Change amount of MELD score
In order to compare the difference between groups in the amount of change in each evaluation variable at the time of visit after cell administration/best supportive therapy compared to the baseline value, covariance analysis (ANCOVA) is performed by setting the baseline time point and stratification factor as a correction variable for each evaluation variable. The higher the score, the higher the mortality rate.
Time frame: week -6 and 0
Change amount of Liver function test
In order to compare the difference between groups in the amount of change in each evaluation variable at the time of visit after cell administration/best supportive therapy compared to the baseline value, covariance analysis (ANCOVA) is performed by setting the baseline time point and stratification factor as a correction variable for each evaluation variable.
Time frame: month 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Change amount of Fibrosis-4
In order to compare the difference between groups in the amount of change in each evaluation variable at the time of visit after cell administration/best supportive therapy compared to the baseline value, covariance analysis (ANCOVA) is performed by setting the baseline time point and stratification factor as a correction variable for each evaluation variable.
Time frame: month 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change amount of FibroScanⓇ
In order to compare the difference between groups in the amount of change in each evaluation variable at the time of visit after cell administration/best supportive therapy compared to the baseline value, covariance analysis (ANCOVA) is performed by setting the baseline time point and stratification factor as a correction variable for each evaluation variable.
Time frame: week -6 and 0
Change amount of EQ-5D
In order to compare the difference between groups in the amount of change in each evaluation variable at the time of visit after cell administration/best supportive therapy compared to the baseline value, covariance analysis (ANCOVA) is performed by setting the baseline time point and stratification factor as a correction variable for each evaluation variable. The higher the score, the higher the quality of life.
Time frame: month -1, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change amount of EQ-VAS
In order to compare the difference between groups in the amount of change in each evaluation variable at the time of visit after cell administration/best supportive therapy compared to the baseline value, covariance analysis (ANCOVA) is performed by setting the baseline time point and stratification factor as a correction variable for each evaluation variable. The higher the score, the higher the quality of life.
Time frame: month -1, 6, 12, 18 and 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.