The study RADAR aims at developing a wearable based dysglycemia detection and warning system for patients with diabetes mellitus using artificial intelligence.
Prior research has investigated the general potential of data analytics and artificial intelligence to infer blood glucose levels from a variety of data sources. In this study patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus will be wearing a continuous glucose meter (CGM) and a smartwatch for a maximum duration of 3 months in an outpatient setting. The gathered data will be used to develop a non-invasive and wearable based dysglycemia detection and warning system using artificial intelligence.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
40
Patients will be wearing a smartwatch and a continuous glucose meter (CGM) over a maximum duration of 3 months in an outpatient setting.
Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism
Bern, Switzerland
Accuracy of the RADAR model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based physiological data in detecting dysglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L and glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) quantified as the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC-ROC)
Accuracy of the RADAR-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and physiological data recorded by the smartwatch compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based physiological data in detecting hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and physiological data recorded by the smartwatch compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based physiological data in detecting severe hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.0 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and physiological data recorded by the smartwatch compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based physiological data in detecting severe hyperglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and physiological data recorded by the smartwatch compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in detecting dysglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L and glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Accuracy of the RADAR+-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in detecting hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR+-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in detecting severe hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.0 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR+-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+ model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in detecting severe hyperglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR+-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting glucose levels quantified as the mean absolute error.
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting dysglycemia (glucose>13.9mmol/L and glucose<3.9 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting severe hyperglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting mild hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.9mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting severe hyperglycemia (glucose < 3.0mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC.
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Change of sleep pattern in dysglycemia (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Sleep pattern will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Change of heart rate in dysglycemia (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Heart rate will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Change of heart rate variability (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Heart rate variability will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Change of skin temperature (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Skin temperature will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Change of electrodermal activity (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Electrodermal activity will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Change of stress level (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Stress level will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Influence of sleep duration on daily time in glycemic target range (3.9 - 10 mmol/L)
Sleep duration will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Influence on stress-level on daily time in glycemic target range (3.9 - 10 mmol/L)
Stress level will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Influence on activity (number of steps and stairs climbed per day) on daily time in glycemic target range (3.9 - 10 mmol/L)
Number of steps and stairs climbed per day will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Influence of movement on daily time in glycemic target range (3.9 - 10.0 mmol/l)
Movement will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
24. Analysis of user requirements for smartwatch based dysglycemia warning systems
User requirements for the smartwatch based dysglycemia warning system will be assessed in a semi-quantitative interview.
Time frame: 4-12 weeks