Currently, there is a lack of patient education materials regarding cytotoxic chemotherapy side effects, research supported treatments, and the utilization of CAM by cancer patients at Penn State Cancer Institute. The investigators aim to develop an educational brochure, which educates patients about the chemotherapy side effects they may experience, and provide them with the tools to address the problem themselves, know when to contact their medical oncologist, and understand when it is appropriate to go to the Emergency Department. By educating patients regarding these problems, patient anxiety may decrease, the number of calls into the oncologist office may decrease, and Emergency Department visits may decrease, which would decrease costs for the patient, the hospital, and the health system. If this intervention is found to be useful and impactful, it can be further utilized within the Cancer Institute by other disease teams, by other Penn State institutions, or by other institutions across the country.
The diagnosis of cancer is a life-altering event which can cause a large amount of distress in patients. One of the several factors that impacts a patient's level of distress, is their fear of the diagnosis and their lack of information in the beginning their cancer journey. Understandably, many patients turn to easily accessible but disreputable resources, such as the internet, to learn and mentally prepare themselves for this journey. Friends and family members may also provide advice or recommendations which may not always be scientifically supported. Disreputable resources often have incorrect information that can scare or mislead a patient, which can severely impact their health and fight against cancer. In order to help patients fight these fears and become properly equipped for the cancer journey, care teams must address the education of patients, especially the education about the chemotherapy treatment process and potential side effects. The primary purpose of this pilot study is to determine the utility of a brochure to educate breast and gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy about the side effects of treatment, in addition to providing them with tools and recommendations to lessen the impact of these side effects on their quality of life. A questionnaire-based approach and the Patient Education Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT) will be employed to evaluate participant's responses in a variety of domains, such as understandability, actionability, and utility of the brochure. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) will be used to capture the specific chemotherapy side effects that each patient is experiencing throughout their treatment. Emotional Thermometer Scales (ETS) will be utilized to assess patients' feelings of depression, anxiety, anger, and distress at the beginning and end of their treatment. Survey questions will be utilized at interval time points (baseline plus 6 and 12 weeks) to evaluate the overall impact of the brochure on their quality of life and symptom management. All patients will receive the brochure and fill out the associated assessment scales and tools. The investigator's hypothesis is that a brochure providing information and tools to address the side effects of breast and gastrointestinal cancer cytotoxic chemotherapy will have utility in cancer clinics and allow patients to improve their quality of life by following the scientifically supported recommendations within the brochure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
36
Participants will be provided with Education Brochure developed by the study team to provide information to patients about managing side effects related to chemotherapy
Penn State Cancer Institute
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Utility of Educational Brochure assessment
• Assessment of the utility of a brochure which educates breast and gastrointestinal cancer patients about the potential side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy, as measured by the validated PEMAT survey score mean and standard deviation from baseline compared to 6 and 12 weeks post baseline assessment. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) scale used for above outcome ranges from minimum of score 0 percent to maximum score of 100 percent. Higher values indicate better outcome.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Symptom Assessment
• Assessment of participant symptoms during cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment utilizing the MSAS. Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale used for above outcome ranges from minimum of score 0 to maximum score of 364. Higher values indicate presence of more and severe symptoms thus indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Emotional Assessment
• Assessment of participant emotions at the beginning and end of the study by comparing ETS scores. The Emotional Thermometer Scale used for above outcome ranges from minimum of score 0 to maximum score of 50. Higher values indicate presence of more and severe symptoms thus indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Baseline Educational Assessment
• Identification of participants with immediate family member (child, spouse, parent) who underwent cytotoxic chemotherapy and participant's education level through questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.