Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains problematic. Our team has thus developed a new patient-reported measure of barriers to ART adherence (the I-Score) which will be completed by HIV patients through the Opal patient portal for routine HIV care. This 6-month mixed method pilot study will implement the I-Score/Opal intervention with 5 HIV physicians at the McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Quebec) and 30 of their patients. The study's primary objectives are to assess patient and physician perceptions of the intervention (e.g., acceptability) and evaluate the implementation strategy. The data collected will help plan and determine the feasibility of a definitive effectiveness trial.
Background: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains problematic. Regular monitoring of its barriers is clinically recommended, however, patient-provider communication around adherence is often inadequate. Our team thus decided to develop a new electronically administered patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of barriers to ART adherence (the I-Score) to facilitate the systematic capture of this data for physician consideration in routine HIV care. To prepare for a controlled definitive trial to test the I-Score intervention, a pilot study was designed. Its primary objectives are to evaluate patient and physician perceptions of the I-Score intervention and its implementation strategy. Methods: This one-arm, 6-month study will adopt a mixed method type 3 implementation-effectiveness hybrid design and be conducted at the Chronic Viral Illness Service of the McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Canada). Five HIV physicians and 30 of their HIV patients with known or suspected adherence problems will participate. The intervention will involve having patients complete the I-Score in the Opal smartphone application, before meeting with their physician. Both patient and physician will have access to the I-Score results, for consideration during the clinic visits at Times 1, 2 (3 months), and 3 (6 months). The implementation strategy will focus on stakeholder involvement, education, and training; promoting the intervention's adaptability; and hiring an Application Manager to facilitate implementation. Implementation, patient, and service outcomes will be collected (Times 1-2-3). The primary outcome is the intervention's acceptability to patients and physicians. Qualitative data obtained, in part, through physician focus groups (Times 2-3) and patient interviews (Times 2-3) will help evaluate the implementation strategy and inform any methodological adaptations. Discussion: This study will help plan a definitive trial to test the efficacy of the I-Score intervention. It will generate needed data on electronic PROM interventions in routine HIV care that will help improve understanding of conditions for their successful implementation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
HIV patients will complete the I-Score PROM via Opal (patient portal) prior to three consecutive clinic visits with their HIV physician who is expected to access their PROM results in time for the visit. The clinic visits will be held at Time 1, Time 2 (3 months) and Time 3 (6 months).
Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Acceptability of the Intervention as assessed with the Acceptability E-scale
Score range: 6-30 (Threshold: M ≥ 24, indicates high acceptability)
Time frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Acceptability of the Intervention as indicated by the percent likely to recommend the I-Score
(Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
Time frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Acceptability of the Intervention as assessed with the Net Promoter Score
Score range: -100 to 100 (Threshold: \> 0, indicates acceptability)
Time frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Appropriateness of the Intervention as assessed with the Perceived Compatibility subscale
Score range: 1 to 7 (Threshold: Score M ≥ 5.5, indicates high compatibility)
Time frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Appropriateness of the Intervention as assessed with the Appropriateness of Intervention Measure
Score range: 1 to 5 (Threshold: Score M ≥ 4, indicates high appropriateness)
Time frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the consent rate
Reasons for refusal will also be collected (Threshold: ≥ 70 percent)
Time frame: At baseline
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the retention rate
(Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
Time frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the missing I-Score data rate
e.g., due to non-completion, network failure (Threshold: ≤ 10 percent)
Time frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the Intervention as assessed with the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Score range: 1 to 5 (Threshold: M ≥ 4, indicates high feasibility)
Time frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Fidelity of the Intervention as indicated by the percentage of patients who complete the I-Score on time
(Threshold: ≥ 90 percent)
Time frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Fidelity of the Intervention as indicated by the percentage of physicians who review the I-Score results on time
(Threshold: ≥ 90 percent)
Time frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the implementation strategy as indicated by the percentage of physicians who participate in the implementation activities
e.g., educational meeting, focus groups (Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
Time frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the implementation strategy as indicated by the number of technical issues encountered
Based on the Application Manager's notes
Time frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.