Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Single shot devices are increasingly used for PVI. Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel cryoballoon technology has recently been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific). However, whether PolarX provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that PolarX was developed considering the reported limitations and potential failures associated with the Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon, it might be even more effective and safe for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for single shot PVI and the PolarX is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence the alternative hypothesis postulates that the PolarX Cryoballoon is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
201
Patients randomized to the Arctic Front cryoballoon group will undergo PVI using the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic). At the end of the procedure, an implantable cardiac monitor (Medtronic Reveal LINQ) will be implanted for the purpose of continuous arrhythmia monitoring.
Patients randomized to PolarX cryoballoon group will undergo PVI using the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific). At the end of the procedure, an implantable cardiac monitor (Medtronic Reveal LINQ) will be implanted for the purpose of continuous arrhythmia monitoring.
University Hospital Basel
Basel, Switzerland
Inselspital, Bern University Hospital
Bern, Switzerland
Time to first recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia
Time to first recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation \[AF\], atrial flutter \[AFL\] or atrial tachycardia \[AT\]) between days 91 and 365 post ablation as detected on continuous implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). AF, AFL or AT will qualify as a recurrence after ablation if it lasts 120 s or longer on ICM (the minimum programmable episode interval).
Time frame: days 91 to 365 post-ablation
Number of participants with complications
Composite endpoint composed of: * cardiac tamponade requiring drainage * persistent phrenic nerve palsy lasting \>24 hours * serious vascular complications requiring intervention * stroke/TIA * atrioesophageal fistula * death
Time frame: days 0 to 30 post-ablation
Total procedure time
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Total LA indwelling time
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Total cryoablation time
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Total number of cryoapplications per patient/per vein
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Time to effect
disappearance of PV-Signal; procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Nadir temperatures
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Total fluoroscopy time
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Radiation dose
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Contrast agent usage
unit measure ml; procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Proportion of veins with PV signals visible before cryoablation
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Rate of Phrenic nerve palsy
procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Changes in high sensitive Troponin (hsTroponin)
one day 1 post-ablation ; procedural endpoint
Time frame: Day 1
Time to first symptomatic recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia
Assessed by the ICM Core Lab. "Symptomatic" is defined as acute onset awareness of palpitations, breathlessness, dizziness, fatigue or chest pain associated with patient activation of the loop recorder. Follow up Endpoint.
Time frame: between 91-365 days after ablation
Time to first recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia
Follow up Endpoint.
Time frame: between days 1 and 90 after ablation
Arrhythmia burden (daily AF burden [hours/day]; overall AF burden = % time in AF)
Assessed by the ICM Core Lab post implantation: between 0-90 days; 91-365 days, 365 days to explantation/end of life of the ICM
Time frame: between: 0-90 days; 91-365 days , 365 days up to 3.5 years
Arrhythmia burden calculated for 7-day intervals (daily AF burden [hours/day]; overall AF burden = % time in AF)
Comparison of full-duration ICM derived endpoints with standard clinical practice derived endpoints. Standard clinical practice being defined as 7d-Holter Periods after 3, 6 and 12 months (modelled with random 7day ICM periods after 3, 6 and 12 months). Follow up Endpoint.
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months follow up
Comparison of the prevalence of the type of arrhythmia
Arrhythmia being AF or organized atrial arrhythmias (Atrial flutter or atrial tachycardias). Follow up Endpoint.
Time frame: 3, 12, 24 and 36 months follow up
Proportion of patients admitted to the hospital or emergency room because of documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmias
based on telephone follow-up
Time frame: postablation 3 months (+/- 2 weeks), 12 months (+/- 2 months), 24 months (+/- 2 months) and 36 months (+/- 2 months)
Proportion of patients undergoing electrical cardioversion because of documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmias
based on telephone follow-up
Time frame: postablation 3 months (+/- 2 weeks), 12 months (+/- 2 months), 24 months (+/- 2 months) and 36 months (+/- 2 months)
Proportion of patients undergoing a repeat ablation procedure because of documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmias
based on telephone follow-up
Time frame: postablation 3 months (+/- 2 weeks), 12 months (+/- 2 months), 24 months (+/- 2 months) and 36 months (+/- 2 months)
Number of reconnected veins assessed in study patients undergoing a Redo-Procedure at one of the study centres
Time frame: during redo-procedure
Sites (anatomical location) of vein reconnection assessed in study patients undergoing a Redo-Procedure at one of the study centres
Time frame: during redo-procedure
Size (area calculate in mm2) of antral scar area assessed in study patients undergoing a Redo-Procedure at one of the study centres
Time frame: during redo-procedure
Evolution of Quality of Life (QoL)
QoL questionnaires (EQ-5D) will be sent to the patients by mail after 3, 12, 24 and 36 months to compare the evolution of QoL after the ablation
Time frame: Months 3, 12, 24 and 36 post procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.