Australia has one of the highest rates of methamphetamine use in the world; however, uptake of face-to-face psychological treatment remains extremely low due to numerous individual (e.g. stigma, shame) and structural (e.g. service availability, geography) barriers to accessing care. Addressing these barriers through the provision of alternative treatment delivery models is imperative, particularly as effective and earlier intervention is likely to reduce the need for more costly and intensive treatment resulting from escalating methamphetamine use. In this project, the investigators will conduct the first double-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the effectiveness of the structured telephone-delivered intervention, Ready2Change (R2C), among participants with methamphetamine use problems (R2C-M). Cost effectiveness of R2C-M will also be investigated. Factors influencing program implementation will be evaluated to inform the scalability of this intervention for practice nationally, and for replication internationally.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
204
R2C-M comprises 12 modules addressing core practice elements and skills from evidence-based cognitive and behavioural interventions. Modules include: (i) self-monitoring, goal setting and behaviour change skills; (ii) identification of strengths and motivational enhancement; (iii) relapse prevention; (iv) psychoeducation and harm reduction; (v) emotion regulation skills; (vi) anger management skills; (vii) urges and cravings management skills; (viii) sleep hygiene skills; (ix) mindfulness skills; (x) interpersonal skills; (xi) anxiety management skills; (xii) depressed mood management skills. The R2C-M workbooks contain psychoeducation and intervention exercises, to facilitate counsellor-delivered exercises within sessions, and between-session practice.
A booklet of information and self-help strategies for methamphetamine use problems.
Turning Point
Richmond, Victoria, Australia
Methamphetamine problem severity
Change in methamphetamine problem severity (Drug Use Disorders Identification Test; DUDIT)
Time frame: 3-months post-randomisation
Methamphetamine problem severity
Change in methamphetamine problem severity (DUDIT)
Time frame: 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Number of methamphetamine use days
Change in number of methamphetamine use days (Timeline Followback; TLFB)
Time frame: 6 weeks, and 3-, 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Amount of methamphetamine used
Change in amount of methamphetamine used (TLFB)
Time frame: 6 weeks, and 3-, 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Number of DSM-5 methamphetamine use disorder criteria met
Change in the number of DSM-5 methamphetamine use disorder criteria met (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders - Research Version; SCID-5-RV)
Time frame: 3-, 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Methamphetamine craving
Change in craving for methamphetamine (Craving Experience Questionnaire; CEQ)
Time frame: 6 weeks, and 3-, 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Psychological functioning
Change in psychological functioning (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale; DASS-12)
Time frame: 6 weeks, and 3-, 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Psychotic-like experiences
Change in psychotic-like experiences (Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences 15, CAPE15)
Time frame: 6 weeks, and 3-, 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Quality of life
Change in quality of life (EUROHIS-QOL single item)
Time frame: 6 weeks, and 3-, 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Days of other drug use
Change in days of other drug use (TLFB)
Time frame: 6 weeks, and 3-, 6- and 12-months post-randomisation
Cost-effectiveness - QALYs
Difference in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (abridged version of the 5-level EQ-5D version, EQ-5D-5L+)
Time frame: Over 12 months
Cost-effectiveness - health care costs
Difference in health care costs (3Mg Health-care Resource Use Questionnaire)
Time frame: Over 12 months
Cost-effectiveness - work-related losses
Difference in work-related losses (World Health Organization Health and Performance Questionnaire Clinical Trials Version; WHO HPQ28-Day)
Time frame: Over 12 months
Adverse events
Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and significant adverse events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks post-randomisation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.