The investigators evaluate the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant therapy and classify the response according to specific periods of time after the end of neoadjuvant treatment.
In the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, an optimal interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery might improve oncological outcomes. Besides, those patients who achieve a good response might benefit from active surveillance, avoiding surgical comorbidities. This optimal interval is yet to be defined. This study will aim to better define the role of time interval between the end of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and TME in Spanish regions, together with analyzing the importance of restaging MRI and define the basis for implementing a "watch and wait" protocol.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
911
Evaluate three groups according to the interval between the end of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
Pathological response
Grade as complete
Time frame: 2000-2019
Circumferential margin (CRM)
Described as free (CRM \>1 mm)
Time frame: 2000-2019
Distal resection margin (DRM)
Described as free (DRM \>1 mm)
Time frame: 2000-2019
Quality of the specimen
Described as complete or incomplete
Time frame: 2000-2019
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.