Encorafenib, Binimetinib and Palbociclib in BRAF-mutant Metastatic Melanoma CELEBRATE

Overview

This is an open-label, phase IB, non-randomised study consisting of a dose escalation phase and expansion phase, evaluating the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and palbociclib in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Dose escalation phase: Previously treated or treatment-naïve patients will be evaluated after the first cycle for dose-limiting toxicities to ascertain the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of encorafenib, binimetinib and palbociclib. Expansion phase: Two cohorts of patients will be further evaluated for the efficacy and safety of the RP2D of palbociclib with encorafenib and binimetinib. Cohort 1 will include patients naïve to both BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Cohort 2 will include patients with either primary or acquired resistance to both BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

This is an open-label, multicentre, Phase IB, dose escalation study with dose expansion designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the encorafenib, binimetinib and palbociclib combination. Patients with untreated or previously treated BRAFV600 mutation-positive, locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic melanoma are eligible. There will be 3 dose levels: Table 1: Dose Level Description Dose Level Encorafenib Binimetinib Palbociclib D1 450mg daily 45mg BID 75mg daily 21/7\* D2 450mg daily 45mg BID 100mg daily 21/7\* D3 450mg daily 45mg BID 125mg daily 21/7\* \* 21 consecutive days on treatment, followed by 7 consecutive days off treatment in a 28 day cycle. Alternate dosing regimens and schedules may be interrogated depending on the nature and timing of the toxicities encountered. The first dose to be evaluated will be dose level D1 and dose escalation will follow using a standard 3 + 3 design (refer to Figure 6). Dose escalation/de-escalation decisions will be made by the Trial Management Committee. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) will be monitored over the first 28 days of treatment. After each dose level of 3 patients complete the DLT observation period, the TMC will meet and review the available toxicity and dosing information and determine the dose regimen for the next dose level of 3 patients and/or identify the RP2D for the dose-expansion phase. Approximately 30 additional patients will be enrolled into each of the two cohorts during the dose-expansion phase. One cohort will consist of previously untreated patients or treated patients without prior exposure to any BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy. The second cohort will consist of patients who have progressed on BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy. A minimum of 10 patients in each cohort must have newly obtained tumour sample at baseline. Accrual may be restricted to achieve this. Treatment of patients in both phases will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any other discontinuation criterion is met. For the purpose of the final analyses, the study will be considered completed when 12 months have passed since the first day of treatment of the last patient enrolled in the expansion phase. Adult patients with a diagnosis of BRAFV600 mutation positive, locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic melanoma who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be eligible for participation in this study. Recruitment will occur from all activated sites into the currently open phase and dose level of the study. Dose Level 1 will be the first to open and will enroll 3 patients at a minimum. The TMC will assess and determine the dose level for the next patients to open to recruitment accordly. Participants in the dose escalation phase will be evaluable for assessment if they complete 80% of their first cycle of combined treatment or they experience a DLT. Once the RP2D has been determined by the TMC, recruitment will continue to occur from all activated sites into the dose expansion phase of the study. All patients in this phase will receive the RP2D. Patients in the dose expansion phase will be assigned to one of the 2 cohorts according to their treatment status (either BRAF/MEK-inhibitor naïve, or previously treated). A number of assessments will occur while the patient is on treatment as well as the following: PK sampling will be collected as part of the safety assessments according to the Schedule of Events in Section 3. On PK sampling days for trough levels (cycle 1 day 15 and cycle 2 day 1), study visits should be scheduled in the morning so a pre-dose PK blood sample can be collected. On these visit days, the morning dose of encorafenib, binimetinib and palbociclib will only be administered by the investigator (or designee) at the study site, after collecting the pre-dose PK sample. For PK visits, patients will be required to be fasting 2 hours before and 1 hour after the dose. Exact dates of drug administration (and actual PK blood draw) will be recorded on the appropriate eCRF. Any sampling problems (e.g. patient took study drug before draw took place) must be noted in the eCRF and on appropriate source documentation. Tumour and blood samples collected for PD and biomarker assessments will be analysed with the objectives of understanding mechanisms of action and PD of the encorafenib, binimetinib and palbociclib combination, identifying biomarkers that are predictive of response, and explaining mechanisms of innate/acquired resistance. Specimens for dynamic (non-inherited) and genetic (inherited) biomarkers will be collected from all patients on the trial. Mandatory plasma samples will be collected from all patients, as described in the Schedule of Events. Circulating tumour DNA will be extracted and analysed for BRAF V600E and V600K mutation status. The mutation profile obtained from the circulating DNA will be compared with the mutation profile obtained from the tumour biopsy collected at baseline, during treatment and on progression. Plasma-circulating DNA carrying BRAF V600E mutation (BRAF-mutated alleles) will be detected and measured over time by determining percentages of total DNA and BRAF V600E concentration, either as relative percentage or absolute values. This may be useful to predict either disease progression at an early stage or response to therapy. The plasma samples may also be used to identify other potential predictive markers of clinical response to the encorafenib, binimetinib and palbociclib combination. Whole blood sample will be analysed for mutations detected in tumour tissue, in order to verify the somatic nature of the mutations. All patients will be required to provide newly collected tumour biopsies at baseline (unless inaccessible), on day 15 of cycle 1 and at the time of disease progression. At least 2 cores per collection time point should be obtained (minimum of 1 core for FFPE, and if feasible, 1 core for fresh frozen biopsy). Excisional biopsies, punch biopsies and 14-gauge core needle biopsies are all acceptable. Fine needle aspiration biopsies will not be accepted. Lesions with the greatest change in dimensional size, based on interval evaluation, are the lesions to be biopsied, if possible. Scheduling of the on-treatment tumour biopsies should not interfere with the scheduling of the first, post-baseline FDG-PET scan. Ideally, tumour biopsies at screening and during Cycle 1 day 15 should be performed after the mandated FDG-PET scan. The biopsy at disease progression should be taken from an enlarging lesion. Biopsies at progression should be obtained within 3 days of study drug discontinuation (i.e. continue study treatment for several days beyond documentation of progression, if necessary, in order to coordinate the timing of biopsy to occur within 3 days of study drug discontinuation). FFPE tumour from baseline, on-treatment (Cycle 1 Day 15) and disease progression biopsies will be used to perform the following biomarker analyses: * Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for molecules known to be relevant for activity of the MAPK and CDK4 pathways (e.g. ERK and MEK protein phosphorylation, RB1 phosphorylation). * IHC for molecules that are potential PD biomarkers for encorafenib, binimetinib and palbociclib. * IHC for molecules potentially related to response/resistance. * Evaluation of the tumour microenvironment by multiplexed IHC and Nanostring gene-array technology. * BRAF mutations (including V600E) and other somatic mutations. Fresh-frozen tumour (baseline, Cycle 1 day 15, and at disease progression) may be used for whole genome analysis; other techniques such as reverse phase protein array or mRNA quantitation may also be performed. There is increasing evidence that the gut microbiome plays a role in melanoma treatment outcome through its immune-modulating effects. In this study, microbiome samples will be collected at baseline and at the end of treatment. DNA will be extracted from faecal samples. Gene sequencing will be performed to survey microbial species in the gut in order to define microbiota as a function of efficacy and safety. Overall changes in the gut microbiota will also be characterised in individual participants that receive therapy. During the study, in addition to the biomarkers specified above, exploratory biomarker research may be conducted on any tumour (newly obtained or archival) and/or blood and/or plasma samples. These studies would extend the search for other potential biomarkers relevant to the effects of the drugs given in combination in this study, and/or prediction of these effects, and/or resistance to the treatment, and/or safety. This may also include research to help develop ways to detect, monitor or treat cancer. These additional investigations would be dependent upon clinical outcome, reagent and sample availability. Patients enrolled in all phases of this study will be treated with the encorafenib, binimetinib and palbociclib combination until progression and/or experiencing unacceptable toxicity, and/or the treatment is discontinued at the discretion of the investigator or withdrawal of consent. Treatment beyond progression of disease will be allowed only under special circumstances; for example: cystic lesions, mixed responses, and new brain metastasis which are treatable with stereotactic radiotherapy or surgery, but not requiring whole brain radiotherapy. It is judged by the investigator, in agreement with the CPI, whether or not a patient may remain on study treatment as long as he/she continues to benefit from the study drug treatment per investigator assessment. A treatment beyond progression consent form will not be required. Tumour response will be evaluated locally by the investigator according to the RECIST version 1.1. Patients will be evaluated for all potential sites of tumour lesions at Screening/baseline and every 8 weeks after starting study treatment until disease progression. On-study tumour assessments have a ± 3-day window. There will be a tumour assessment at the 30 day safety follow-up (± 7 days) if the patient discontinues for any reason other than disease progression and the last tumour assessment has been performed \> 28 days prior to this day. Patients who discontinue study treatment due to a reason other than disease progression should continue to be followed and undergo tumour assessments every 8 weeks (± 3 days) until disease progression or initiation of subsequent anti-neoplastic therapy, or death, whichever occurs first. Every effort must be made to assess each lesion that is measured at Screening/baseline by the same method throughout the study so that the comparison is consistent. At all post-Screening/baseline assessments and the 30 day safety follow-up, the following should be performed: * All patients are required to undergo chest, abdomen and pelvis CT/MRI scans. * Brain MRI or CT scan, if metastases were documented at baseline * Additional imaging evaluations may be performed at any time if there is symptomatic evidence suggesting the possibility of disease progression based on clinical symptoms or physical exam. Criteria required for determining partial or complete response should be present for at least 4 weeks. All complete and partial responses must be confirmed by a second assessment at least 4 weeks later. If unscheduled imaging evaluations are performed (e.g. to confirm response or if progression is suspected), every effort should be made to perform subsequent imaging evaluations in accordance with the original imaging schedule. If evidence of progressive disease is nonequivocal, every effort should be made to keep the patient on study medication for at least one additional imaging evaluation as long as it is clinically acceptable. CT scans should be acquired with IV contrast. If a patient is known to have a medical contraindication to CT IV contrast agent or develops a contraindication during the study, a CT scan without IV contrast of the chest and MRI with IV contrast, if possible, of the abdomen and pelvis may be performed. A CT scan of the brain, preferably with IV contrast, may be performed if MRI is contra-indicated. Chest x-ray or ultrasound should not be used for tumour response assessments in this study. Any lesions that have been subjected to loco-regional therapies (e.g., radiotherapy, ablation, etc.) should not be considered measurable, unless they have clearly progressed since the therapy. Previously treated lesions that have not progressed should be considered non-measurable and therefore, assessed as non-target lesions. PET scan is not adequate for RECIST v1.1 response assessment. If a PET scan is used for determination of disease progression, then a corresponding CT and/or MRI scan is required. CT and/or MRI scans will be compared against PET scans. Each centre should have a designated radiologist responsible for the interpretation of CT/MRI scans and response evaluations for study patients. Preferably, a single radiologist should perform all evaluations for an individual patient. In this study, FDG-PET scans will be used to provide a non-invasive measurement of drug activity and a potential early readout of anti-tumour activity in patients on day 15 of Cycle 1. FDG-PET scans are optional for non-Australian sites. Metabolic response in a lesion will be assessed according to the method given in Wahl et al 2009 and will be centrally assessed at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. Scans are read visually displayed side by side with liver uptake normalised between images. Response categories are defined as follows (comparison is with baseline PET scans in each case: * Complete metabolic response (CMR): complete resolution of 18F-FDG uptake within measurable target lesion so that it is less than mean liver activity and indistinguishable from surrounding background blood-pool levels. * Partial metabolic response (PMR): reduction of minimum of 30% in target measurable tumor 18F-FDG SUL peak. Absolute drop in SUL must be at least 0.8 SUL units, as well * Stable metabolic disease (SMD): not CMR, PMR, or PMD. * Progressive metabolic disease (PMD): 30% increase in 18F-FDG SUL peak, with .0.8 SUL unit increase in tumor SUV peak from baseline scan in pattern typical of tumor and not of infection/treatment effect. OR: Visible increase in extent of 18F-FDG tumor uptake (75% in TLG volume with no decline in SUL. OR: New 18F-FDG-avid lesions that are typical of cancer and not related to treatment effect or infection.