Background. Survivors of childhood brain tumours have the poorest health-related quality of life of all cancer survivors due to the multiple physical and psychological sequelae of brain tumours and their treatment. Remotely delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may be a suitable and accessible psychological intervention to support young people who have survived brain tumours. Aims. This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of remotely delivered ACT to improve quality of life among young brain tumour survivors. Method. This study is a two-arm, parallel group, randomised controlled trial comparing ACT with waitlist control. Participants will be aged 11-24 years and survivors of brain tumours who have completed cancer treatment. Participants will be randomised to receive 12 weeks of ACT either immediately or after a 12-week wait. The durability of treatment effects will be assessed by further follow-up assessments at 24-, 36- and 48- weeks. The DNA-v model of ACT will be employed, which is a developmentally appropriate model for young people. Feasibility will be assessed using the proportion of those showing interest who consent to the trial and complete the intervention. A range of clinical outcome measures will also assess physical and mental health, everyday functioning, quality of life and service usage. Acceptability will be assessed using participant evaluations of the intervention, alongside qualitative interviews and treatment diaries analysed thematically. Discussion. This study will provide an initial assessment of the value of remotely delivered ACT in supporting recovery and coping for young people after brain tumour treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
72
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an evidence-based psychological therapy that has been used to improve physical and mental health among adults with health conditions, including cancer (Graham, Gouick, Krahe, \& Gillanders, 2016). It fosters engagement with, rather than avoidance of, painful experiences, to move towards acceptance of unchangeable difficulties alongside building a rich and meaningful life despite the presence of ongoing problems.
Sophie Thomas
Nottingham, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGTreatment completion rate
The proportion of patients showing interest who then consent to the trial and complete the intervention
Time frame: assessed at 3-month follow-up
Treatment completion rate
The proportion of patients showing interest who then consent to the trial and complete the intervention
Time frame: assessed at 6-month follow-up
Session attendance rate
The session attendance rate compared to feasibility benchmarks
Time frame: assessed at 3-month follow-up
Session attendance rate
The session attendance rate compared to feasibility benchmarks
Time frame: assessed at 6-month follow-up
The credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Assessing participant ratings of treatment credibility. Minimum score = 5; maximum score = 45. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
The credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Assessing participant ratings of treatment credibility. Minimum score = 5; maximum score = 45. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at session 2
The experience of service questionnaire
A questionnaire used nationally in child and adolescent mental health services completed by patients and parents/carers (if under 16) to assess participants' experience of the intervention. An additional item has been added to the experience of service questionnaire to assess video-conferencing treatment satisfaction. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 20. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at 3-month follow-up.
The experience of service questionnaire
A questionnaire used nationally in child and adolescent mental health services completed by patients and parents/carers (if under 16) to assess participants' experience of the intervention. An additional item has been added to the experience of service questionnaire to assess video-conferencing treatment satisfaction. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 20. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at 6-month follow-up.
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II
A brief 7-item self-report measure assessing psychological inflexibility, which is the central treatment target for ACT. Validated for use among patients aged 16 and over. Minimum score = 7; maximum score = 49. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth 8-items
A brief self-report measure of psychological inflexibility, for children (11 to 15 year old participants). Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 32. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
World Health Organisation wellbeing index 5-items
A brief self-reported assessment of wellbeing and mental health. Minimum score = 7 score; maximum = 49. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 49. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment 7-items
A brief self-reported measure of generalised anxiety symptoms using 4-point Likert scales based on diagnostic criteria. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
Patient Health Questionnaire 9-items
Assesses symptoms of depression using self-reported 4-point Likert scales based on diagnostic criteria for major depression. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 27. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
Euroqol 5-dimensions 3-levels
a self-reported assessment of five key dimensions of health-related quality of life: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The youth version will be used for participants under 16 years old. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 1. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities
Assesses satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. It, therefore, acts as a measure of social engagement which can be heavily impacted by brain tumour diagnosis and treatment. Minimum score = 8; maximum score = 40. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire 25-item
A patient and parent/carer-completed brief measure of behavioural and emotional functioning. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 50. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
Client Service Receipt Inventory
A research instrument developed to collect information on service receipt, service-related issues and income. In addition, the Client Service Receipt Inventory collects information on school attendance in the 3-months prior to assessment.
Time frame: assessed at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month follow-up
Experiential interviews
Participant experiences of treatment as described in semi-structured qualitative interviews
Time frame: assessed at 3- and 6-month follow-up