The purpose of this study is to test whether the timing of meals can improve treatment adverse events, influence tumor biology and alter a person's mood and behaviors.
Combining fasting with chemotherapy is known to cause complete tumor regression and long-term survival in animal models. According to the Differential Stress Sensitization (DSS) theory, acute fasting sensitizes tumor cells to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiation, while protecting healthy cells by increasing stress resistance. These effects are believed to be largely mediated via the Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF-1) pathway. However, extended fasting can be challenging for patients and poses undue health risks. A number of alternative intermittent fasting regimens have been proposed to overcome the challenges of prolonged caloric restriction. One promising approach is time-restricted eating (TRE), which involves eating within a period of 10 hours or less, followed by fasting for at least 14 hours daily. TRE does not involve extended caloric restriction, and because of its simplicity, it may be more sustainable than other fasting regimens. TRE improves several cardiometabolic endpoints independent of calorie restriction in both animals and humans, including insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, fat oxidation, and hunger. Our team's pilot and feasibility trials suggest that TRE may also have anti-cancer effects: it decreases IGF-1 levels, reduces oxidative stress, upregulates antioxidant defenses, and enhances autophagy. Moreover, our data suggest TRE is sustainable, as participants were adherent 6.0 plus or minus 0.8 days/week over a 14-week period. These findings lead to the following provocative question: Can TRE reduce treatment-related toxicity, induce tumor regression, and improve both patient-reported and clinical outcomes? We propose to conduct the largest randomized controlled trial of any form of intermittent fasting in patients undergoing cancer treatment. We focus on patients with localized rectal or breast cancer because it is one of the few treatment paradigms in which tumor characteristics can be measured before and after chemoradiation therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
175
8-hour daily eating period, starting 1-3 hours after waking up
More than equal to a 12-hour daily eating period
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGCedars-Sinai Medical Center
West Hollywood, California, United States
RECRUITINGPathologic Complete Response (pCR) and Organ Preservation Rate
Measures whether participants achieve either a pathologic complete response (no invasive cancer is found in the removed tumor or sampled lymph nodes) or organ preservation at the end of treatment. For rectal cancer, organ preservation is defined as a complete or near-complete clinical response after therapy that allows the patient to safely avoid surgery, based on findings from exam, endoscopy, and MRI. Quantified as a percentage (%).
Time frame: at end of 6-month intervention
Patient-Reported AEs (PRO-CTCAEs)
Adverse events as measured by the PRO-CTCAE (version 5), which includes about three dozen toxicities that patients can systematically document the frequency, severity (and interference of each toxicity).
Time frame: at end of 6-month intervention
Clinical Response
Clinical response at end of treatment, categorized as: complete (no detectable disease on exam, endoscopy, or MRI); near-complete (minimal residual abnormality); partial (≥30% tumor decrease); stable disease; or progressive disease (≥20% tumor increase). We will also report the objective response rate (complete + near-complete + partial), percent with complete/near-complete responses, and percent with progressive disease. For breast cancer, responses may be estimated by physicians or MRI technicians. Values will also be expressed as percentages.
Time frame: at end of 6-month intervention
Tumor Response
Different scales by cancer type. Rectal cancer, using MRI Tumor Regression Grade (1-5, with 1 = complete response) at end of treatment and the Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) score (0-100) at baseline and post-intervention. Breast cancer measured using the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score (0-4), where 0 indicates a pathologic complete response.
Time frame: at end of 6 month intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Provider-Reported AEs (Treatment Related Toxicities)
Measures treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reported by providers from the start of therapy to the day before surgery. AEs are graded using CTCAE v5, and we will report totals as well as Grade 1-2 and Grade 3-4 events. The Toxicity Index (TI) will also be calculated, which ranges from 0 to 5.83.
Time frame: at end of 6 month intervention
Health-Related Quality of Life
Assessed at each testing visit using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for all participants, the QLQ-breast cancer 23 (QLQ-BR32) for breast cancer, and the QLQ-rectal cancer 29 (QLQ-CR29) for rectal cancer. All scales are scored from 0-100, with higher functional and global health scores indicating better quality of life and higher symptom scores indicating worse symptoms. The QLQ-C30 includes five functional scales, three symptom scales, and a global quality-of-life scale, while the BR23 and CR29 include cancer-specific functional and symptom scales.
Time frame: at end of 6 month intervention