The aim of this study is to investigate the difference of efficacy and safety between transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) and transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) in the diagnosis of lung ground-glass opacity.
The conventional biopsy method for lung ground-glass opacity (GGO) diagnosis is to use disposable guided sheath (including biopsy forceps and cell brushes) which have some limitations, such as big physical damage, small biopsy tissue, etc. Cryobiospy is a new technique for biopsy developed in recent years which has many advantages over conventional biopsy, such as larger tissue, higher diagnosis yield, less complication, etc. The investigators will explore the efficacy and safety of cryobiospy vs. biopsy forceps in GGO diagnosis. The study is designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial, 184 patients will be expected to enroll in the study and receive EBUS examination before biopsy to check whether the GGO lesions exist or not. This is a parallel-control study that patients with GGO lesions will be randomized to either TBCB group or TBFB group for biopsy. The primary aim is to compare the diagnostic yields of the two biopsy techniques. The secondary endpoint is to assess the tissue size, sampling time, number of sampling and the quality of specimen.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
184
The eligible patient will be randomized to TBCB group to receive transbronchial cryobiopsy.
The eligible patient will be randomized to TBFB group to receive transbronchial forceps biopsy.
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Diagnostic yield
Diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) or transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) for lung ground-glass opacity.
Time frame: Up to 6 Months
Tissue size
The maximum diameter measured by the biopsy tissue.
Time frame: Up to 1 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.