Glioblastoma (GBM), a very aggressive brain tumour, is one of the most malignant of all cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis. The majority of GBM cells display damaged mitochondria (the "batteries" of cells), so they rely on an alternate method for producing energy called the Warburg Effect, which relies nearly exclusively on glucose (in contrast, normal cells can use other molecules, such as fatty acids and fat-derived ketones, for energy). Metabolic interventions, such as fasting and ketogenic diets, target cancer cell metabolism by enhancing mitochondria function, decreasing blood glucose levels, and increasing blood ketone levels, creating an advantage for normal cells but a disadvantage for cancer cells. Preliminary experience at Waikato Hospital has shown that a metabolic therapy program (MTP) utilizing fasting and ketogenic diets is feasible and safe in people with advanced cancer, and may provide a therapeutic benefit. We aim to determine whether using an MTP concurrently with standard oncological treatment (chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy) is feasible and safe in patients with GBM, and has treatment outcomes consistent with greater overall treatment efficacy than in published trials.
Gliomas are tumours that originate from glial cells in the central nervous system. The most common histological subtype is GBM, which accounts for nearly 50% of all malignant brain tumours. Despite aggressive multimodal treatment, the median survival for GBM is poor (8-15 months). Although cancer is regarded as a genetic disease, it may be perceived as a metabolic disorder. The majority of human cancers, including GBM, display low numbers of mitochondria, most of which are structurally damaged, resulting in defective cell respiration. To compensate, cancer cells greatly increase their uptake of glucose, which is fermented (regardless of oxygen concentration, a process known as the Warburg Effect) to generate energy. Cancer cells also rely on increased growth signaling pathways involving insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, and mammalian target of rapamycin to support their unbridled growth and proliferation. Cancer cells may therefore be vulnerable to interventions that selectively target their abnormal metabolism. Metabolic interventions, such as fasting and ketogenic diets, target cancer cell metabolism and may be effective alongside standard treatments in advanced cancers. Fasting is a voluntary abstinence from food and drink for a controlled period of time (typically, 12 hours to 3 weeks in humans), whereas ketogenic diets are high-fat, adequate-protein, low-carbohydrate diets that stimulate the body to create a fasting-like metabolic state. Fasting and ketogenic diets stimulate mitochondria biogenesis, decrease blood glucose, increase liver production of fat-derived ketones (which serve as a major alternative energy source for most normal cells within the body, but cannot be utilized by cancer cells), and decrease growth factor availability. Thus, fasting and ketogenic diets provide an advantage for normal cells but a disadvantage to cancer cells by enhancing mitochondria biogenesis and function, depriving cancer cells of their major fuel, and creating a cell environment unfavourable for unbridled growth and proliferation. Preliminary experience at Waikato Hospital has shown that a metabolic therapy program (MTP) consisting of fasting and/or a ketogenic diet is feasible, safe, and may be effective in patients with advanced cancer, including GBM. In a recent case report, a metabolic strategy (7-day fast every 1-2 months, with a ketogenic diet between fasts) resulted in the near-complete regression of a stage IVA metastatic thymoma after 2 years. Moreover, we are currently observing 8 glioblastoma patients who voluntarily consented to undergo fasting and ketogenic diet therapy in a manner similar to what we propose to use in this study; at an average of 4-5 months, all patients have completed the fasts and adhered to their ketogenic diet, experiencing only mild adverse effects. On this background, we aim to determine whether using an MTP concurrently with standard oncological treatment (chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy) is feasible and safe, and has treatment outcomes consistent with greater overall treatment efficacy than in published trials, in patients with GBM.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
18
See description under "Arms."
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, Waikato Region, New Zealand
Mean daily blood glucose-to-ketone ratio during chemoradiation
Proportion of patients able to sustain functional ketosis (defined as a mean daily blood glucose-to-ketone ratio of ≤6) during chemoradiation (defined as the beginning of the first fast through to 3 weeks following completion of chemoradiation)
Time frame: 9 weeks
Mean daily blood glucose-to-ketone ratio during adjuvant chemotherapy
Proportion of patients able to sustain functional ketosis during adjuvant chemotherapy (defined as the beginning of the first adjuvant chemotherapy fast through to completion of adjuvant chemotherapy)
Time frame: 24 weeks
Mean daily blood glucose-to-ketone ratio during the MTP, calculated separately on fasting and ketogenic diet days
Proportion of patients able to sustain functional ketosis during the MTP (defined as the beginning of chemoradiation through to the end of adjuvant chemotherapy), calculated separately each fasting and ketogenic diet phase
Time frame: 33 weeks
Change in weight
Weight (kg)
Time frame: 33 weeks
Safety as measured by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4)
Number of adverse events (of any grade)
Time frame: After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Change in performance status as measured by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale (scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating lower performance status)
Time frame: After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Change in leisure/exercise activity as measured by Godin Leisure-Time Exercise questionnaire
Godin Leisure-Time Exercise questionnaire (scores range from 0 to no maximum, with higher scores indicating higher leisure/exercise activity)
Time frame: After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Change in quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain questionnaire
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 200, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life)
Time frame: After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Progression-free survival
Progression-free survival
Time frame: From date of biopsy-confirmed diagnosis to date of first documented progression, whichever came first, up to 33 weeks
Overall survival
Overall survival
Time frame: From date of biopsy-confirmed diagnosis to date of death from any cause, whichever came first, up to 33 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.