Nepal and the South Asian sub-continent carry some of the highest rates of burn injury globally, with an associated high morbidity and mortality. Nepal currently has one major center equipped for burn care, in Kirtipur, Nepal and receives referred patients from around the country. At presentation, most patients with major burns have had minimal to no resuscitation on arrival, often hours to days after the burn injury was sustained. Timely fluid resuscitation, initiated as soon as possible after major burn injury, is the main tenet of acute burn care. Lack of adequate resuscitation in major burn injuries leads to kidney injury, progression of burn injury, sepsis, burn shock, and death. The current standard of care for major burn resuscitation is intravenous fluid resuscitation. In Nepal, however, adequately trained and equipped hospitals for treatment of burn care are not available (for a variety of reasons). Additionally, there is not a systematic emergency medical transport system available for provision of medical care and resuscitation during transport. Enteral-based resuscitation with substances like the WHO Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) is recommended by burn experts and the professional burn societies when resources and access to intravenous fluid resuscitation are not available in resource-constrained settings such as rural areas, low- and middle-income countries, and military battlefield scenarios. Studies have previously demonstrated the efficacy and safety of enteral-based resuscitation in controlled, high-resource settings, however there have not been real-world effectiveness trials in austere settings. Therefore, the investigators seek to ultimately address the problem of pre-hospital and pre-burn center admission resuscitation by studying the feasibility and effectiveness of enteral resuscitation with Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) in preventing burn shock. This study examines enteral (oral)-based resuscitation with ORS and IV Fluids versus only IV Fluids for the treatment of major burn injuries. The intervention portion of the study will entail randomization of patients presenting with acute burn injuries of 20-40% total body surface area (TBSA) to an enteral-based resuscitation versus the standard of care IV fluid resuscitation. The intervention will continue through the 24-72 hours of the acute resuscitation period. This is a feasibility study, primarily to develop and establish the research infrastructure and practices at the study site for future pilot study and eventually randomized-controlled trial research on this intervention. The primary outcomes will be measures of feasibility such as the adherence rate to the resuscitation protocols. Further, there will be a qualitative component to the study with focus group interviews of the bedside healthcare providers (doctors and nurses) who are caring for the enrolled patients, in order to understand the challenges and facilitators of enteral resuscitation. Qualitative analysis will be done to understand the major themes of challenges and facilitators to enteral resuscitation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Feasibility study of Enteral-based resuscitation with Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) vs standard-of-care Intravenous Fluid resuscitation for moderate-sized burn injuries in Nepal
Standard-of-care Intravenous Fluid resuscitation
Nepal Cleft and Burn Center at Kirtipur Hospital
Ki̇̄rtipur, Bagmati, Nepal
24 Hour Average Urine Output (UOP)
Calculated by totaling all of the recorded urine output (adding up the columns labelled HR 1-2 UO, HR 3-4 UO, etc. until HR 23-24), then dividing by their weight in Kg (column labelled Admission weight) and dividing by 24 hours. The units of this measurement will be mL/kg/hr.
Time frame: 24 hours
24-hour Resuscitation Volume
Calculated by totaling the total resuscitative fluids administered in first 24 hours of resuscitation, divided by admission weight and % TBSA of burn injury. (cc/kg/% TBSA of burn injury)
Time frame: 24 hours
Hours From Injury to Resuscitation
Hours calculated from point of injury to starting of resuscitation.
Time frame: Point measurement (Once at the start of resuscitation)
Number of Participants With GI Discomfort
Any "check" for nausea, vomiting, distention, diarrhea
Time frame: 24 hours
Number of Participants Crossover to IV Due to GI Intolerance
Number of participants crossover to standard of care (IV resuscitation) due to GI intolerance like nausea, vomitting
Time frame: 24hours
Number of Participants With Acute Kidney Injury
Measured with any signs of Acute Kidney injury during first 72 hours of resuscitation according to KDIGO definition i.e., increase in serum creatinine by 0.3mg/dL or more within 48 hours or increase in serum creatinine to 1.5 times baseline or more within the last 7 days or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours. AKI on admission was defined as a serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL with less than 0.5 mL/kg/h of urine output for the first hour. Urine output was measured every 2 hours for the first 24 hours and serum creatinine was measured on admission then 8,16,24,48 and 72 hours from the commencement of the resuscitation.
Time frame: 72 hours
Participants Death Within 72 Hours of Resuscitation
Secondary resuscitation outcome measured daily within study period i.e. 72 hours of resuscitation as participant death related or associated with the study. Monitored by data safety monitoring board and if proven to be associated with the study considered serious adverse event.
Time frame: 72 hours
Discharge Outcome
Outcome of hospital stay
Time frame: Measured over complete course of hospitalization until discharge or death, assessed every 24 hours after enrollment in the study. Maximum timeframe 6 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.