The aim of the trial is the comparison of the effectiveness of two methods of Orthokine administration (periradicular or epidural) in lumbar degenerative disc disease.
BACKGROUND: Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (LDDD) is a serious, global health problem for patients from the third decade of life. It is assumed that 75-85% of the population suffer from pain in the lumbar spine at least once during their lifetime (vital morbidity), and 3-5% of the population suffer from root-type pain. The annual prevalence of the spine complaints in the United States alone ranges from 15 to 20%, and in Europe it ranges from 25 to 45%. In addition to the immeasurable losses associated with impaired patient activity and a significant reduction in the quality of their life, LBP is the greatest burden for the world economy, measured by the years lived with disability (YLD) index due to a significant reduction in the productivity and professional ability of patients affected by LBP. AIM: Assessment of the effectiveness of symptomatic treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (LDDD) with the autologous Orthokine serum, comparison of two methods of its application - epidural or periradicular. DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial without blinding SETTING: Open study for outpatients, single center study POPULATION: local population METHODS: Two groups of patients (A, B) with confirmed LDDD by MRI, without gender or age limitation, meeting the health conditions according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There will be 50 people in each group (100 people in total). Group A - therapy with Orthokine serum - a total of 4 injections of 2 doses at weekly intervals (4 doses of 4 ml of serum in total), injections will be performed into the epidural space from an interlaminar access under ultrasound guidance by the same operator. Group B - therapy with Orthokine serum - a total of 4 injections of 1 or 2 doses depending on the number of levels occupied at weekly intervals (a total of 4 doses of 4 ml of serum), injections will be performed periradicular (transforaminal) under ultrasound guidance by the same operator. Assessment tools: Numeric Rating Scale NRS (0-10), Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire, Roland Morris questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire Control points W0 - before the therapy, W1 - 1 month after the last dose of serum W2 - 3 months after the last dose of serum W3 - 6 months after the last serum dose.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Ultrasound guided injections
Ultrasound guided injections
Sutherland Medical Center
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
RECRUITINGChange in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 24 weeks
EQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L descriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Minimum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.
Time frame: Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 24 weeks
Disease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Time frame: Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Change in Roland Morris Questionnaire score from baseline to 24 weeks
Disease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 24 (the worst score).
Time frame: Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Pain according to Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to 4 weeks
0 (no pain) - 10 points (the worst possible pain)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Pain according to Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to 12 weeks
0 (no pain) - 10 points (the worst possible pain)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Pain according to Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to 24 weeks
0 (no pain) - 10 points (the worst possible pain)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Change in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 4 week
EQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L descriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Minimum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Change in EQ-5D-5L index from baseline to 12 week
EQ-5D-5L index estimated from EQ-5D-5L descriptive system based on Polish directly measured value set. Minimum: -0.590; Maximum: 1.0; More points means better outcome.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 4 weeks
Disease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 12 weeks
Disease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 50 (the worst score).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Roland Morris Questionnaire score from baseline to 4 weeks
Disease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 24 (the worst score).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Change in Roland Morris Questionnaire score from baseline to 12 weeks
Disease-specific questionnaire. Range: 0 (the best score) - 24 (the worst score).
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks