The purpose of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of the current diagnostic criteria of cardiac sarcoidosis.
Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory condition rarely affecting the heart, exhibiting fluctuating disease activity and eventually leading to ventricular fibrosis. Clinical presentation ranges from no symptoms at all to life-threatening arrhythmias, heart failure and death in severe cases. The heart lesions show patchy distribution and can mimic virtually any other type of cardiomyopathy, which poses significant challenges for the accurate and eary diagnosis. At present, there are four diagnostic tools and recomendations for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) that utilize clinical, ECG, laboratory, imaging and biopsy criteria. Recently, it was demonstrated that there is a significant diagreement between these four diagnostic tools. On the other hand, earlier identification of patients with active inflammatory process is necessary, as they are those who will most likely benefit from immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of the current clinical, ECG, laboratory, imaging and biopsy criteria for diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis. Patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis based on clinical symptoms will recieve elaborate diagnostic work-up consisting of: evaluation of symptoms, family history, occupational hazards, ECG, chest X-ray, laboratory markers for sarcoidosis, positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as well as endomyocardial biopsy. In accordance to the recomendations of the current guidelines, the patients will be devided into 3 groups: 1) patients with proven CS; 2) patients with probable CS; and 3) unlikely CS that will serve as a reference group. The patients in first two groups will be treated with immunosuppressive therapy, mainly glucocorticoids (GC). The follow-up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months will consist of evaluation of the symptoms using dedicated King's Sarcoidosis Questionaire (KSQ), fatigue assessment scale (FAS), Holter-ECG, pacemaker interrogation, laboratory findings, imaging with PET and CMR. Clinical outcomes will be defined as: 1) improvement of symptoms (FAS score, heart failure class, AV block, ventricular arrhythmias, and KSQ score) and 2) improvement of imaging parameters ( left ventricular ejection fraction, PET activity, myocardial edema, scar in CMR). The outcomes between the groups will be compared using group 3 as reference. Furthermore, patients with improvement with GC (successful therapy) will be compared with those without improvement (unsuccessful therapy) and the predictive value of each diagnostic criterion will be evaluated. Finally, the odds ratios (OR) for each parameter will be used to calculate a diagnostic and predictive score which will be used prospectively to evaluate patients with suspected CS and to guide the therapy.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
100
ECG - 12 leads ECG Echo: transthoracic echocardiography laboratory tests: full blood count, electrolytes, creatinine, high sensitive cardiac troponin T, angiontesin converting enzyme, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: 1.5 Tesla scanner, Conventional cine imaging and late gadolinium enhancement imaging PET-CT: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)- positron emission tomograph Biopsy: cardiac biopsy = endomyocardial biopsy, left and right ventricle, at least 5 specimens in formaldehyd and 3 specimens for testing of infectious agents Biopsy: extracardiac biopsy, as accessible according to imaging
Heart Center of Leipzig
Leipzig, Germany
RECRUITINGClinical recovery with immunosuppressive therapy
Number of patients showing clinical recovery defined as improvement of at least one of the following: decrease of the heart failure class, decrease of fatigue assessed by FAS score, increase of KSQ score with at least 10 points, reduction of burden of ventricular arrhythmias assessed with Holter ECG or device interrogations, improvement of the AV block
Time frame: 1 year
Imaging recovery with immunosuppressive therapy
Number of patients with improvement of the cardiac imaging defined as one of the following: increase of the EF with at least 10%, decrease of the PET activity, decrease of the scar or edema in CMR
Time frame: 1 year
Cardiac mortality
Number of patients who died of cardiac reasons
Time frame: 2 years
All-cause mortality
Number of patients who died of cardiac or non-cardiac reasons
Time frame: 2 years
Unplanned hospitalizations
Number of unplanned hospitalizations due to heart failure or ventricular arrhythmias
Time frame: 2 years
Change in LV-EF from baseline
Measured in echocardiography or CMR as at least 10% change of the LV EF, LV EDD
Time frame: 2 years
Change in RV function
Measured in echocardiography or CMR as 10% change of RV EF, RV diameter, TAPSE
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Patients' quality of life
A dedicated King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) will be used to assess patients condition. Values from 1 to 100 define the patients' condition with higher scores indicating better condition. Improvement will be defined as increase of the KSQ score with at least 10 points.
Time frame: 2 years
VT ablation success
Applies only for patients after VT ablation: Time to VT recurrence
Time frame: 2 years
Adverse events of immunosuppressive therapy
Number of patients with significant adverse events related to the immunosuppressive therapy
Time frame: 2 years
Changes of immunosuppressive therapy due to lack of success
Number of GC dose increase and/or switch to another medication and/or escalation of therapy adding other immunosuppressive drugs to the GC
Time frame: 2 years