Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a rare autoimmune, inflammatory disorder of the orbit and represents the most common extra-thyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease (GD). Several lines of evidence suggest an important role of interleukin-17A (IL-17A) in the pathogenesis of TED; increased levels of IL-17A have been detected in the serum and tears of patients with TED and IL-17A levels correlate with clinical activity of the disease. T-helper 17 cells (Th17 cells) (as well as other cellular sources of IL-17A, e.g., Tc17 cells) have been shown to infiltrate the orbital tissue of affected patients, producing IL-17A. IL-17A stimulates fibroblast activation, leading to retrobulbar tissue expansion and orbital fibrosis, which causes significant functional impairment. Secukinumab is a recombinant high-affinity fully human monoclonal anti-IL-17A antibody currently approved for the treatment of 3 inflammatory/ autoimmune diseases: moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) (ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axSpA). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) in adults with active, moderate to severe TED.
This study consisted of the following 3 periods: 1. Screening period (Week -6 to Baseline): Participants' eligibility was assessed during the Screening period, which occurred for a maximum of 6 weeks. 2. Treatment period (Baseline to Week 16): Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following double-blinded treatment arms: * Arm 1: Secukinumab 300 mg s.c. at Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 * Arm 2: Placebo s.c. at Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 Participants were stratified according to current smoking status (up to 20% smokers per arm) since smoking has a well-known impact on treatment efficacy in TED. 3. Follow-up/open-label retreatment period (Week 16 up to Week 108): * Proptosis responders (see definition below) at Week 16 were followed for relapse up to Week 68. If these participants relapsed, they were offered a course of open-label secukinumab at the time of relapse (see "proptosis relapsers" definition below). * Proptosis non-responders (see definition below) at Week 16 were offered the option of open-label secukinumab treatment (with maintenance of blind to initial randomized treatment) for a duration of 16 weeks, i.e., up to Week 32 with last dose at Week 28, as follows: * Open-label secukinumab 300 mg s.c. at Week 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24 and 28. Thereafter (i.e., from Week 32), participants were followed up for a further 24 weeks to assess the relapse rate. * For participants who were proptosis non-responders and who did not receive open-label secukinumab treatment, a follow-up visit 8 weeks after the Week 16 visit needed to be scheduled per protocol. At this follow-up visit, the assessments associated with the Week 24 visit (for responders) were to be performed. * Proptosis relapsers (see definition below) during the follow-up period (from Week 16 onward to Week 68) were offered the option of retreatment with open-label secukinumab for a duration of 16 weeks (with maintenance of blind to initial randomized treatment) at the time of relapse as follows: * Open-label secukinumab 300 mg s.c. at time of relapse, then at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weeks since time of relapse. Thereafter, participants were followed up for a further 24 weeks (i.e., 40 weeks after start of retreatment) to assess rate of relapse and safety. * For participants not receiving open-label secukinumab treatment a follow-up visit 8 weeks after the Week 16 visit were to be scheduled per protocol, if not yet completed. At this follow-up visit, the assessments associated with the Week 24 visit (for responders) were to be performed. Definitions of proptosis responder, non-responder and relapser: * Proptosis responders: Participants achieving response in reduction of proptosis at Week 16 defined as follows: reduction of \>= 2 mm from Baseline in the study eye without deterioration (\>= 2 mm increase) of proptosis in the fellow eye. * Proptosis non-responders: Participants not achieving response in reduction of proptosis at Week 16 with "response" defined as follows: reduction of \>= 2 mm from Baseline in the study eye without deterioration (\>= 2 mm increase) of proptosis in the fellow eye. * Proptosis relapsers: Participants who were "proptosis responders" as defined above, and then relapsed based on proptosis at any time during the 52-week follow-up period with relapse defined as follows: increase in proptosis of \>= 2 mm compared to Week 16 in the study eye or deterioration of proptosis (\>= 2 mm increase) in the fellow eye at any time during 52-week follow-up period. In case of worsening of the disease, participants were allowed to receive alternative treatment for TED at the discretion of the investigator and were discontinued from the study treatment. The primary endpoint analysis was planned to be performed once all participants had reached Week 40, which included the primary efficacy endpoint (Week 16), efficacy of retreatment for initial non-responders and relapse rates during 24 weeks of follow-up. The final analysis was planned to be performed when the last participant had reached the end of trial. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressed different preferences regarding the primary and secondary objectives and endpoints and their ordering. Therefore, this study intended to have 2 different analysis strategies and corresponding primary, secondary objective and endpoint definitions; Plan A was intended for submission in Europe (EU) and other applicable countries and Plan B was intended for submission in the United States (US) and other applicable countries. As the study was early terminated, only Plan A analysis was conducted.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
28
Secukinumab 300 mg s.c. at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Placebo s.c. at Baseline, Weeks 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Frankfurt, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, Germany
Plan A - Percentage of Participants Achieving Overall Response
The percentage of participants achieving overall response was defined as follows: \>= 2 points reduction in clinical activity score (CAS) AND \>= 2 mm reduction in proptosis from Baseline in the study eye, provided there was no corresponding deterioration in CAS or proptosis (\>= 2 point or 2 mm increase, respectively) in the fellow eye after 16 weeks of treatment. Due to premature study discontinuation, purely descriptive analyses were performed for the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan B - Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in Reduction of Proptosis
The percentage of participants achieving response in reduction of proptosis at Week 16 was defined as follows: reduction of \>= 2 mm from Baseline in the study eye without deterioration (\>= 2 mm increase) of proptosis in the fellow eye. Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the primary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan A - Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in Reduction of Clinical Activity Score (CAS)
The percentage of participants achieving response in reduction of clinical activity score (CAS) at Week 16 was defined as follows: reduction of \>= 2 points from Baseline in the study eye without deterioration (\>= 2 points increase) of CAS in the fellow eye. Due to premature study discontinuation, purely descriptive analyses were performed for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan A - Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in Reduction of Proptosis
The percentage of participants achieving response in reduction of proptosis at Week 16 was defined as follows: reduction of \>= 2 mm from Baseline in the study eye without deterioration (\>= 2 mm increase) of proptosis in the fellow eye. Due to premature study discontinuation, purely descriptive analyses were performed for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan A - Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in Diplopia
The percentage of participants achieving response in diplopia at Week 16 was defined as follows: Baseline diplopia \> 0 and a reduction of \>= 1 grade with no corresponding deterioration (\>= 1 grade worsening) in the fellow eye at Week 16. Due to premature study discontinuation, purely descriptive analyses were performed for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan A - Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Clinical Activity Score (CAS) in the Study Eye
Thyroid Eye Disease (TED) activity was assessed using the CAS at the frequency indicated in the study schedule based on the following signs and symptoms in accordance with the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) guideline: * Symptoms * Spontaneous retrobulbar pain * Pain on attempted upward or downward gaze * Signs * Redness of eyelids * Redness of conjunctiva * Swelling of caruncle or plica * Swelling of eyelids * Swelling of conjunctiva (chemosis) For each item present, 1 point is given. The sum of these points is the CAS score, i.e., minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 7. * Inactive TED: CAS \< 3. * Active TED: CAS \>= 3.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Plan A - Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Millimeters (mm) of Proptosis in the Study Eye
Proptosis measurements were performed at the frequency indicated in the study schedule. The same Hertel instrument, and the same outer intercanthal distance, were to be used for each measurement. The mean of measurements (change from baseline in millimeters (mm) of proptosis, calculated as: (Post-Baseline value - Baseline value) / Baseline value \* 100)) for each group were presented. Due to premature study discontinuation, purely descriptive analyses were performed for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Plan A - Percentage of Participants With Improvement in EUGOGO Disease Severity
Thyroid Eye Disease (TED) activity was assessed using the CAS at the frequency indicated in the study schedule based on the following signs and symptoms in accordance with the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) guideline. Improvement in EUGOGO disease severity was categorized: Mild, Moderate to severe and Sight threatening.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Plan A - Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO-QOL) Score (Score 1: Visual Functioning) Over Time
The Graves' ophthalmopathy quality of life questionnaire (GO-QOL) contains 8 questions on visual functioning and 8 questions on appearance; answers on each subscale are transformed to scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Due to premature study discontinuation, purely descriptive analyses were performed for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Plan A - Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO-QOL) Score (Score 2: Psychosocial Functioning) Over Time
The Graves' ophthalmopathy quality of life questionnaire (GO-QOL) contains 8 questions on visual functioning and 8 questions on appearance; answers on each subscale are transformed to scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Due to premature study discontinuation, purely descriptive analyses were performed for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Plan A - Number of Participants With Adverse Events
The distribution of adverse events during Plan A study treatment period was done via the analysis of frequencies for Adverse Event (AEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment until Week 16
Plan B - Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in Reduction of Clinical Activity Score (CAS)
The percentage of participants achieving response in reduction of CAS at Week 16 was defined as follows: reduction of \>= 2 points from Baseline in the study eye without deterioration (\>= 2 points increase) of CAS in the fellow eye. Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan B - Percentage of Participants Achieving Overall Response
The percentage of participants achieving overall response was defined as follows: \>= 2 points reduction in CAS AND \>= 2 mm reduction in proptosis from Baseline in the study eye, provided there was no corresponding deterioration in CAS or proptosis (\>= 2 point or 2 mm increase, respectively) in the fellow eye after 16 weeks of treatment. Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan B - Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in Diplopia
The percentage of participants achieving response in diplopia at Week 16 was defined as follows: Baseline diplopia \> 0 and a reduction of \>= 1 grade with no corresponding deterioration (\>= 1 grade worsening) in the fellow eye at Week 16. Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan B - Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Clinical Activity Score (CAS) in the Study Eye.
Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan B - Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Proptosis in the Study Eye.
Proptosis is the protrusion of the eyeball. Exophthalmos means the same, and this term is usually used when describing proptosis due to Grave's disease. Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Plan B - Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO-QOL) Score (Score 1: Visual Functioning)
The Graves' ophthalmopathy quality of life questionnaire (GO-QOL) contains 8 questions on visual functioning and 8 questions on appearance; answers on each subscale are transformed to scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Plan B - Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire (GO-QOL) Score (Score 2: Psychosocial Functioning)
The Graves' ophthalmopathy quality of life questionnaire (GO-QOL) contains 8 questions on visual functioning and 8 questions on appearance; answers on each subscale are transformed to scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Plan B - Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Due to premature study discontinuation, only Plan A was conducted (Plan B was not initiated) for the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment until Week 16
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.