A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Part 1: Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), and randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\] as fixed effects. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Gaining >0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥84 Letters in BCVA (20/20 Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥69 Letters in BCVA (20/40 or Better Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With ≤38 Letters in BCVA (20/200 or Worse Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (\>38 and ≤38 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world). All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), as assessed by the central reading center. The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline CST (continuous), and randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\] as fixed effects. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Macular Edema in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness of \<325 microns in the study eye. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Intraretinal fluid was measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Subretinal fluid was measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 24

Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid were measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Part 1: Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score at Week 24

The NEI VFQ-25 captures a patient's perception of vision-related functioning and vision-related quality of life. The core measure includes 25 items that comprise 11 vision-related subscales and 1 item on general health. The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better vision-related functioning. For the ANCOVA analysis, the model uses the non-missing change from baseline in BCVA at Weeks 24 as the response variables adjusted for the treatment group, baseline NEI VFQ-25 Composite Score (continuous), baseline BCVA score (≥55 and ≤54 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and the rest of the world). Observed NEI VFQ-25 assessments were used regardless of the occurrence of intercurrent events. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Parts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), and randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\] as fixed effects. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Gaining >0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥84 Letters in BCVA (20/20 Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥69 Letters in BCVA (20/40 or Better Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With ≤38 Letters in BCVA (20/200 or Worse Snellen Equivalent) in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (\>38 and ≤38 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world). All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in NEI VFQ-25 Questionnaire Composite Score at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

The NEI VFQ-25 captures a patient's perception of vision-related functioning and vision-related quality of life. The core measure includes 25 items that comprise 11 vision-related subscales and 1 item on general health. The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better vision-related functioning. For the MMRM analysis, the model adjusted for the treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline NEI VFQ-25 Composite Score continuous), baseline BCVA score (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and the rest of the world). Observed NEI VFQ-25 assessments were used regardless of the occurrence of intercurrent events. Missing data were implicitly imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 48, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), as assessed by the central reading center. The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline CST (continuous), and randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\] as fixed effects. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Macular Edema in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness of \<325 microns in the study eye. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Intraretinal fluid was measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Subretinal fluid was measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid were measured in the study eye using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm) by a central reading center. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Part 2: Change From Week 24 in BCVA in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), and randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\] as fixed effects. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Part 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Week 24 in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Part 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Week 24 in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Part 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Week 24 in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Part 2: Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of >0 Letters in BCVA From Week 24 in the Study Eye at Specified Timepoints Through Week 72

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted percentage of participants was estimated based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\]. All observed values were used regardless of the occurrence of an intercurrent event (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). Missing assessments were imputed by last observation carried forward. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, and 72

Part 2: Percentage of Participants on Different Treatment Intervals at Week 68

In Part 2 of the study, participants in both the faricimab Q4W and aflibercept Q4W arms in Part 1 received 6 mg faricimab intravitreal injections administered according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing regimen in intervals between Q4W and Q16W. At faricimab dosing visits, treatment intervals were maintained or adjusted (i.e., increased by 4 weeks or decreased by 4, 8, or 12 weeks), based on central subfield thickness (CST) and BCVA values.

Time frame: Week 68

Part 2: Number of Study Drug Injections Received in the Study Eye From Week 24 Through Week 72

Time frame: From Week 24 to Week 72

Incidence and Severity of Ocular Adverse Events in the Study Eye, With Severity Determined According to Adverse Event Severity Grading Scale

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs that occurred in the study eye. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. Ocular AEs of special interest included the following: Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI).

Time frame: Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72

Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events in the Fellow Eye

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs that occurred in the fellow eye. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. Ocular AEs of special interest included the following: Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI).

Time frame: Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72

Incidence of Non-Ocular Adverse Events

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on adverse events (AEs) at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. The non-ocular AE of special interest was: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.

Time frame: Part 1: From first dose up to Week 24; Part 2: from Week 24 through Week 72

Plasma Concentration of Faricimab Over Time

Time frame: Predose at Day 1 (Baseline), Weeks 4, 24, 28, 52, and 72

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Faricimab at Baseline and Post-Baseline During the Study

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against fariciamb were detected in plasma using a validated bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA-positive samples includes post-baseline evaluable participants with at least one treatment-induced (defined as having an ADA-negative sample or missing sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample) or treatment-boosted (defined as having an ADA-positive sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample with a titer that is equal to or greater than 4-fold baseline titer) ADA-positive sample during the study treatment period. Treatment-unaffected ADA-positive is a post-baseline sample with a titer that is lower than 4-fold the ADA-positive baseline titer (faricimab arm) or the ADA-positive titer prior to first faricimab injection (aflibercept arm).

Time frame: Predose at Day 1 (Baseline), Weeks 4, 24, 28, 52, and 72