Oropharyngeal sensory impairments are a potential target for treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in older patients. We previously found acute administration of TRP sensory stimulants improved VFS signs and swallow response. We hypothesized that sub-acute administration of TRP pharyngeal sensory stimulants, would improve cortical neuroplasticity and will lead into a faster and stronger swallow response, however desensitization of TRP receptors may occur. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the biomechanical (Videofluoroscopy) and neurophysiological (pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials -PSEPs- and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs)) effect of 2 week treatment with TRP agonists in older patients with OD. Design: 150 older (\>70yr) patients with OD will be included in a Randomized Control Trial assessing the effect of oral administration of either: a) capsaicin (TRPV1); b) piperine (TRPV1/TRPA1) c) cinnamaldehyde (TRPA1); d) citric acid (ASIC3); e) capsaicin+citric acid (TRPV1/ASIC3); and f) placebo (Control). Measurements: 1) VFS signs of safety and efficacy of swallow and timing and extent of swallow response; 2) Latency, amplitude and cortical representation of PSEP and MEP; 3) Substance P concentration in saliva by ELISA as a marker of peripheral stimulation. Results from this study might help to develop new and effective pharmacological treatments for older dysphagic patients, from compensation to recovery of swallow function.
The project consists of a randomized, double-blind controlled interventional clinical trial (patient and analysis of results) with five treatment arms and a control group (placebo) involving a total of 150 elderly patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (25 patients per group). The recruitment of participants for the study will be carried out from the patients referred to the Dysphagia Unit of the Hospital de Mataró for the evaluation of swallowing disorders. The swallowing function of all candidates to be included in the study will be clinically evaluated using the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST). Those patients with signs of impaired safety of swallowing during the examination (cough, decreased O2 saturation greater than 2% or voice change) will be candidates to participate in the study. They will be informed and in case of acceptance a saliva sample will be taken, and a videofluoroscopy (VFS) will be performed. If the patient presents impaired safety of swallow (Penetration aspiration scale higher or equal than 2), the patient will be definitively randomized to one of the branches of intervention and the rest of the explorations will proceed (sensory evoked potentials to pharyngeal electrical stimulation and pharyngeal motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation). After the treatment period a second evaluation of study procedures will be performed. The treatment will consist of administering 10mL solution of the study product, according to randomization, 3 times a day (before breakfast, lunch and dinner) for 14 consecutive days after inclusion in the study. Treatment selected according our previous studies (Alvarez-Berdugo et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017) are: Capsaicin 10microM, Piperine 150microM, Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM, citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5), Capsaicin 10microM + citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5). For the control group, placebo product will be administered, which will be the vehicle solution with a more neutral pH.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
150
10 mL Capsaicin 10microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
10 mL Piperine 150microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
10 mL Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
10 mL Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
10 mL Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
10 mL placebo solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
Consorci Sanitari del Maresme (Hospital de Mataró)
Mataró, Barcelona, Spain
Change in the score of the Penetration Aspiration Scale
Differences found in the videofluoroscopy Penetration Aspiration Scale (from 1 (safe swallow) to 8 (silent aspiration)) between treatments and vs. the placebo group.
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Impaired safety of swallow
Videofluoroscopic signs of impaired safety of swallow (penetrations an aspirations)
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Impaired efficacy
Videofluoroscopic signs of impaired efficacy of swallow (oral and pharyngeal residue)
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Oropharyngeal swallow response (laryngeal vestibule closure time)
Laryngeal vestibule closure time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Oropharyngeal swallow response (upper esophageal opening time)
Upper esophageal opening time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Oropharyngeal swallow response (laryngeal vestibule opening time)
Laryngeal vestibule opening time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Oropharyngeal swallow response (Bolus final velocity)
Bolus final velocity (m/s) in videofluoroscopy
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials
Latency and amplitude of N1, P1, N2 and P2 peaks of the Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials.
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials
Latency, amplitude, duration and area under de curve of the Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials.
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Sensory threshold
Sensory threshold to pharyngeal electrical stimulation (mA)
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Substance P
Concentration of substance P in saliva.
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Palatability and comfort with the treatment.
Palatability and comfort with the treatment.
Time frame: Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.