The PROMPT study aims to routinely implement genomic pre-sorting of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients for personalized treatment (e.g. immuno-, PARP inhibitors, or platinum-therapy). The investigators hypothesize that, by doing this early in the disease course (before exhausting standard of care options), it will improve treatment planning, patient outcome, quality of life, and reduce costs.
Prostate cancer is a major health problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality in men worldwide. Approved therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) include abiraterone and enzalutamide (targeting the androgen signaling pathway), radium-223 (bone targeting radionuclide therapy), and taxane chemotherapy. Controversy remains on optimal sequencing of available therapeutic agents, and these drugs are still commonly prescribed in a trial-and-error manner. Only a minority of patients receives the full benefit of the anticancer armamentarium, but all experience unnecessary side-effects, quality of life deterioration, and delay in onset to adequate life-prolonging treatment. In addition, the prescription of ineffective drugs and avoidable hospital admissions contribute to the financial burden of health care systems. In recent years, distinct molecular subsets of prostate cancer have been identified in mCRPC. These molecular defects may guide physicians in proper sequencing of medication and in predicting the individual response more accurately. In previous studies using next-generation sequencing (NGS) mCRPC patients could be grouped into clearly distinct molecular subtypes. Moreover, in these subtypes biomarkers associated with resistance to certain therapies, or biomarkers actually predictive for enhanced response were identified. In this study the investigators will introduce routine molecular characterization in participants with mCRPC as early as possible in their disease state. Participants will be screened before initiation of second-line treatment, since early identification will maximize clinical and financial benefit. Following screening, participants will be discussed in molecular tumor board and clinical meetings, and stratified to the agent they are most likely to respond to. Translational research is included to identify and validate additional predictive molecular biomarkers.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
400
A biopsy will be taken from metastatic tissue, which will be used for DNA sequencing
Blood samples will be taken for additional translational research
Radboud UMC
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
RECRUITINGResponsiveness ratio
Ratio of radiographic progression-free survival of personalized treatment or standard of care to the standard last line therapy (PFS-MPT-ratio vs PFS-SOC-ratio)
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Efficacy endpoint: ORR
Best objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1 criteria
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Efficacy endpoint: rPFS
Radiographic progresssion free survival (per RECIST1.1)
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Efficacy endpoint: PSA response
PSA decline \>50% at 12 weeks or later
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Efficacy endpoint: PSA-PFS
Time to PSA progression (per PCWG3 criteria)
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Efficacy endpoint: OS
Overall survival capped at 1 year
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Quality of life endpoint: EORTC-QLQ-30
Score of EORTC-QLQ-30 questionnaire
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Quality of life endpoint: EPIC-26
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Score of EPIC-26 questionnaire
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Quality of life endpoint: EQ-5D-5L
Score of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Quality of life endpoint: BIP-SF
Score of BIP-SF questionnaire
Time frame: Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start)
Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); nr of lines
Averaged number of lines of standard care per year
Time frame: At the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5)
Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); costs
Averaged costs of standard care per year
Time frame: At the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5)
Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); treatment-related costs
Averaged costs of treatment-related resource utilization (e.g. admissions in ward or ICU) per admission and/or per duration
Time frame: At the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5)