Decrease the prevalence of frailty syndrome in individuals with complete response of cancer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
exercise and nutritional support program during an active support phase (0 to 6 months) followed by an empowerment phase (from 6 to 12 months)
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, France
RECRUITINGChange of the prevalence of frailty syndrome in individuals with complete response of cancer
evolution of individual frailty during a multimodal intervention (physical and nutritional activity) according to the Fried's criteria
Time frame: 0, 6 and 12 months
evaluation of predicitive variables of frailty syndrome reversion
The criterion determining the frail status is the Fried score classified into 3 categories: not frail; pre-frail; frail. A change from frail to pre-frail or to not frail will be considered as an improvement. Measurements of the Frailty score and other markers on nutrition and APA will be carried out at month 0 (basic measurements), then measured at month 6 (end of APA and nutritionist support) and at month12 (6 months after empowerment). All of health markers collected during the basic assessment, changes in parameters (month 6) and compliance with APA and nutrition support (from Month 1 to Month 6 then between Month 6 and Month 12) will be tested as variables potentially predictive of an improvement in the frailty syndrome.
Time frame: Month 0, 6 and 12
Correlations between physical performance and frailty syndrome and their evolutions
measurement of VO2peak + ventilatory thresholds measured in a stress test, muscle strength/endurance (number of chair raises for 30 seconds), walking speed (10-meter walking test, 6-minute walk test), balance (Tinette score), coordination (functional mobility test), cardio-respiratory endurance (heart rate measurement in relation to pedaling power)
Time frame: Month 0, 6 and 12
Change from baseline nutritional status during nutritionist support (month 3 and 6) and at the end of empowerment (month 12)
nutritional parameters measured at each time frame for weight, VAS appetite score, MNA score, nutritional calculation (food survey and self-questionnaire), bio impedancemetry and biomarkers of nutrition (levels of albumin, prealbumin, C reactive protein, CBC, liver and kidney function)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Month 0, 3, 6 and 12
Measure adherence to APA interventions and exercise practices
Adherence to APA support program throughout the study will be evaluated by measurements and sum of multiple parameters: number of sessions recorded on the heart rate monitor, average energy expenditure (in kcal) measured by the heart rate monitor,number of sets of exercises performed relative to the number of exercises recommended for muscle strengthening recorded in the patient notebook, CESS scale to assess beliefs about cancer patients and physical activity
Time frame: between month 1 to 6 and between month 6 to 12
Estimation of adherence to nutritional interventions
comparison between active support phase and empowerment phase with food self-questionnaire
Time frame: Month 6 and 12
Measure the durability of long-term activities
number of monthly patient connections to heart rate monitor; evaluation of the completion of patient notebook
Time frame: Month 6 and 12
Measure health related quality of life on mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression
Assessment of quality of life with EQ-5D questionnaire by comparison to the basal state (M0).
Time frame: Month 0, 6 and 12
Sociological study on motivation: evaluation of the perception and experience of treating patients
a series of qualitative interviews with a panel of 15 patients, during 2 interview sessions: 1 after support phase and 1 at the end of autonomy phase. Interview will collect past/current socio-professional life, socialization in physical activity and nutrition.
Time frame: Month 6 and 12