This study will examine how the use of antidepressant, physical therapy, and combination of both affects pain, function, and depression outcomes in chronic low back pain patients.
Approximately 20 million Americans are affected by chronic low back pain and negative affective states such as depression and anxiety. These negative states have all been associated with higher pain intensity, lower pain tolerance, greater use of pain medication, poor pain treatment responses, and higher levels of psychiatric comorbidity among low back pain patients. To improve these outcomes for those who suffer from low back pain, it is important to implement multiple methods with a focus in treating negative affect for pain management rather than using opioids alone. Antidepressant (AD) and fear avoidance-based physical therapy (EFAR) have individually shown to be promising methods for pain management. In this study, AD, EFAR, and the combination therapy of the two treatments will be explored and implemented to investigate their effectiveness in improving pain, function, depression, and anxiety. The key innovation is testing a new and effective multimodal treatment that can help manage pain, as well as address negative affect.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
308
The antidepressant treatment utilizes antidepressant medication to improve pain, function, and depression outcomes. The Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF) will be used to assess adequacy of any prior antidepressant medication treatment and to assist the decision regarding which antidepressant to start. A medication flowchart will help serve as a guideline throughout the drug selection and dosing determination. Weekly assessments completed by subjects will help determine response, tolerability, and necessity for dose adjustment or medication change.
The EFAR treatment utilizes standardized physical and/or occupational therapy fear avoidance approaches, including pain education, and motivational messaging to improve pain, function, and depression outcomes. Subjects will engage in gradual exposure to exercises and activities they are apprehensive about, such as standing to wash dishes.
BWH Pain Management Center
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
UPMC Pain Medicine At Centre Commons
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
"Composite Responder", Involving the Domains of Pain, Function, and Depression. See "Other Pre-Specified Outcomes" for Description of These Sub-components.
To create the "composite responder" measure, Pain+ function changes will be 1 meaure, and the response rate to depression will be the 2nd component, which simplifies the assessment of multi-domain responses. We will determine the "composite responder" rate of multimodal vs. single-modal treatment primarily, and then between each arm secondarily, along with the subcomponents. The "composite responder" measure will be the number and percentage of participants meeting the measure in each arm in Phase 1. A participant could be a pain+function responder, a depression responder, both, or neither. We use standard benchmarks for determining responses in each domain. The primary outcome is the rate of response vs. non-response on the "Composite Responder" measure. It will be expressed as percentiles in each category. We will also report the rate of pain+function responders and the rate of depression responders (other pre-specified outcomes).
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4th month of study
Change From Baseline Pain Interference at 4 Months Using PROMIS
The PROMIS Short Form v1.1 - Pain Interference 4a will assess self-reported consequences of pain with 4 questions ranked on a 5-point scale, from "not at all" to "very much". The minimum raw summed score is 4 and the maximum score is 20. This is converted to a T score. A lower T-scores suggest better outcomes. The population mean is 50 and 10 points is +/- 1 standard deviation. A T score \>60 suggests moderately elevated levels of the measure. Outcomes will be measured and compared between the 3 treatment groups.
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4 months
Change From Baseline Anxiety at 4 Months Using PROMIS
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a will assess self-reported symptoms with 4 questions ranked on a 5-point scale, from "never" to "always". The minimum raw score is a 4 and the maximum is 20.. These are converted to a T score. The population mean is 50 and 10 points is +/- 1 standard deviation. A T score \>60 suggests moderately elevated levels of the measure. Lower T-scores suggest better outcomes. Outcomes will be measured and compared between the 3 treatment groups.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4 months
Change From Baseline Sleep Disturbance at 4 Months Using PROMIS
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 6a self-reported perceptions of sleep quality and sleep depth with 6 questions ranked on a 5-point scale. The minimum raw summed score is 6 and the maximum score is 30. This is converted to a T score. Lower T scores suggest better outcomes. Outcomes will be measured and compared between the 3 treatment groups. The population mean is 50 and 10 points is +/- 1 standard deviation. A T score \>60 suggests moderately elevated levels of the measure.
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4 months
Change From Baseline Subject's Perception of Change From Treatment at 4 Months Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The subject's impression of the impact of the treatment on their pain and function will be measured with a 7-item scale (1 = very much worse, 2 = much worse, 3 = minimally worse, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally improved, 6 = much improved, 7 = very much improved). This is the percentage reporting "very much improved" or "much improved" at the end of Phase 1. We averaged their PGIC ratings in the 4th month.
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4 months
Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Change, Baseline vs. 4 Months
Using PainDetect, we will compare changes in neuropathic pain symptoms from baseline to 4 months. PainDetect is scored from 0-38 and based on ratings to symptom items scored from '0' (never) to '5' (very strongly). Lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4 months
Fear Avoidance Beliefs, Baseline vs. 4 Months
Using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Physical Activities Items, subjects rate from '0' (completely disagree) to '6' (completely agree) five physical activities which may make their pain worse. The items are summed to produce the total score. The minimum score is a 0 and the maximum is a 30. Lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4 months
Widespread Pain Index
This measure assesses the degree of widespread pain. 20 body regions are rated by patient as having pain or not. The minumum scores is a 0 and the maximum is a 20. The number of regions is summed to give the total score. Lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4 months
Change in PROMIS Fatigue Score From Baseline vs. 4 Months
The PROMIS short form v. 1.0 for Fatigue consists of 2 items rated from 1-5, from "not at all" to "very much." The minimum raw score is a 2 and the maximum is a 10. The raw score is summed and converted to a T score. Lower T scores are better. The population mean is 50 and 10 points is +/- 1 standard deviation. A T score \>60 suggests moderately elevated levels of the measure.
Time frame: Baseline vs. 4 months
WPI Symptom Severity Score
Overall symptom severity is rated 0-10. Lower scores are better.
Time frame: Baseline to 4 months