One in five people in the general adult population suffer from chronic pain, a figure that is higher than heart disease, cancer, and diabetes combined. A majority of these patients is suffering from chronic back pain. Conventional treatment options offer only a partial response, with many people continuing to suffer severe chronic pain, despite receiving several treatments. Non-pharmacological treatments by neuromodulation represent a promising treatment modality for these patients. For instance, spinal cord stimulation blocks pain signals travelling to the brain, but requires implantation near the spine with significant clinical risks. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is another neuromodulation modality proposed to alleviate chronic pain. Conventional VNS devices are implanted under the skin on the chest and the electrodes are wired to the left vagus nerve in the neck. However, aside from implantation risks, VNS is often associated with side effects such as swallowing difficulties, due to unwanted stimulation of motoric vagus nerve branches in the neck. Percutaneous auricular VNS (pVNS) is an emerging technology for stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve in the pinna of the ear. Specific electrical impulses are applied via three miniature needle electrodes located in the auricle near sensory vagus nerve fibers. Scientific data show that pVNS modulates brain circuits involved in autonomic control and pain processing. pVNS has shown positive effects in chronic low-back pain patients, in a sustainable way with a low side-effect profile. However, the optimal settings of stimulation with regards to personalization remain to be elucidated. The present prospective, open, randomized, controlled pilot study aims at evaluating the performance of pVNS treatment, using a small wearable stimulation device (AuriMod CT01), comparing personalized and non-personalized stimulation paradigms in patients with chronic low-back pain. Patients will be randomized in one of the following treatment groups (1) Group A: Stimulation with personalized stimulation parameters and amplitude, (2) Group B: Stimulation with personalized stimulation amplitude, (3) Group C: Stimulation without personalization (comparator group). Patients will be treated for 8 weeks. Patients will receive standardized pain medication including rescue medication in parallel. An additional follow-up period of 12 weeks allows to evaluate sustainable and late-time effects of treatment. Patients will use a therapy management system to monitor outcome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
43
AuriMod CT01 is a wearable medical device for personalised pain treatment through auricular vagus nerve stimulation. AuriMod CT01 is a battery-operated electrical stimulation device, to be placed behind the ear on the neck. AuriMod CT01 connects to three needle electrodes, which are placed in vagally innervated regions of the auricle. It emits electrical signals with a personalized set of stimulation parameters and adjustable amplitude.
AuriMod CT01 with a fixed set of stimulation parameters and adjustable stimulation amplitude.
AuriMod CT01 with a fixed set of stimulation parameters and amplitude.
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee
Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria
Hopital de La Tour
Geneva, Switzerland
Average VAS
Change from baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain) during the last 24 hours before the visit
Time frame: 8 weeks
Max/Min VAS
Change from baseline to EoT in max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Average/Max/Min VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Change from baseline to End of Follow-Up in average/max/min VAS
Time frame: 20 weeks
Normalized average/max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Baseline-adjusted area under the max/min/average VAS from baseline to EoT
Time frame: 8 weeks
VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
VAS during follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Medication use
Pain and rescue medication consumption during treatment and follow-up phase
Time frame: 20 weeks
Heart Rate
Change in heart rate over therapy and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
Heart Rate Variability
Change in heart rate variability over therapy and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
Blood Pressure
Change in blood pressure over therapy and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
Patient motility
Change in daily step count over therapy and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
painDETECT
painDETECT questionnaire over treatment and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire over treatment and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
HADS
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) over treatment and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
Sleep quality
Sleep quality (5-item questionnaire) over treatment and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
Wellbeing
Subjective wellbeing (on a 3-point ordinal scale: good, medium, bad)
Time frame: 20 weeks
Perception Scale
AuriMod CT01 Perception Scale evaluating the quality of stimulation perception in a 10-item questionnaire at EoT
Time frame: 8 weeks
Usability Scale
AuriMod CT01 Usability scoring using the System Usability Scale (10-item scale from 10-50, 10...worst usability, 50...best usability) at EoT
Time frame: 8 weeks
Socioeconomic data
Socioeconomic data change over treatment and follow-up
Time frame: 20 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.