The goal of this multi-centre phase I/II open-label, single-arm study is to determine the safety, feasibility, therapeutic dose, and preliminary efficacy of psilocybin microdosing to treat psychological distress among patients with advanced illness. Forty patients will receive psilocybin drug product (1-3mg per day, Mon-Fri) for 4 weeks to be administered via oral capsules by the participant. Feasibility (recruitment rate, rate of intervention and follow-up completion), safety (rate of adverse events), dosing, and preliminary efficacy (depression, anxiety, overall well-being, and global impression of change) will be measured.
Patients with advanced illness report feeling a sense of hopelessness, loss of autonomy and relationships, and a lack of purpose in life. These feelings of psychological suffering have been described as "existential distress" and are associated with poor outcomes, including decreased medication adherence and quality of life, increased desire for hastened death and rates of suicide, and has been identified as a primary reason why individuals pursue medical assistance in dying (MAiD). Current treatments for psychological and existential suffering have low efficacy and are challenging to use in a palliative context. Pharmacological approaches for treating psychological suffering may reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety, but evidence to support their efficacy in palliative care (PC) is underwhelming. Antidepressant and anxiolytic medications also take time to work and can cause serious side effects such as falls and confusion, which can be substantial deterrents for patients. Similarly, results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have demonstrated psychotherapeutic interventions show limited benefit in a PC population. Further, psychotherapy can be time consuming and slow to work, which is not ideal for patients with limited life expectancy. Given the burden of psychological and existential distress among patients followed by PC providers, there is a need to develop scalable, brief, and rapidly effective therapeutic approaches to reduce this distress. Psychedelic medications offer an innovative, safe, complementary approach to address psychological and existential suffering in patients receiving PC. Studies from the 1950's showed serotonergic hallucinogens ("psychedelics") improved depression and anxiety symptoms in cancer patients. However, legislative changes restricted the use of these medications in clinical care and research. Interest in psychedelic medications has been rekindled by two recently published RCTs that studied the use of psilocybin (a mushroom-derived 5HT2A agonist) during a single psychotherapeutic session in cancer patients with anxiety and/or depression. These trials demonstrated rapid, clinically meaningful, and long-lasting reductions in depressed mood and/or anxiety symptoms and improvements in quality of life and death acceptance. There is also evidence suggesting psilocybin microdosing - taking sub-hallucinogenic doses continuously over longer time periods, rather than a one-time hallucinogenic dose - can improve mood and anxiety. The effects of microdosing, however, have not been rigorously evaluated, particularly in patients with life limiting illness. Results from recent trials are encouraging but knowledge gaps remain. First, studies to date primarily enrolled patients with localized disease who experience different distress than that of patients with advanced disease who are near the end of life. Second, it is unclear if Canadians would find psilocybin an attractive option in the context of MAiD legalization, which provides an alternative option for patients with severe psychological suffering. Third, there is no empirical research on the therapeutic effects of psilocybin microdosing, as most studies have followed macrodosing protocols. While preliminary efficacy of macrodosing has been demonstrated, there are important barriers to administering this therapy in a PC context. Previous trials had slow recruitment rates, suggesting there may be barriers related to the acceptability of psilocybin macrodosing from the perspectives of patients and families. Macrodosing requires the patient to dedicate an entire day to participating in a guided hallucinogenic experience and remain in an acute care setting where they can be closely monitored. It also requires patients to engage in preparatory sessions with monitors and a post-therapy session. In a PC context, this time commitment may not be acceptable or feasible for patients who are nearing the end of life. Additionally, macrodosing requires at least two trained moderators to guide the patient through their psychedelic experience and facilitate the pre- and post-dosing sessions. In most PC settings, it is not feasible to have clinicians dedicate two days to a single patient, thus limiting the scalability of this intervention. Psilocybin microdosing has the potential to overcome barriers to the feasibility and acceptability of macrodosing. By removing the requirement for trained moderators, minimizing the time commitment required of patients, eliminating the hallucinogenic effects of the therapy, and allowing patients to receive treatment either as an inpatient or in the community, microdosing may be a more acceptable option to patients and families and allow psychedelic therapy to be scalable across various PC settings. Psilocybin microdosing is a novel, complementary therapy that, while still unproven for patients near the end of life, has the potential to fundamentally change the way psychological and existential distress is responded to in PC, improving the lives of the 30% of patients who experience this suffering at the end of life. Objective To determine if psilocybin microdosing is a safe and feasible treatment for psychological distress among patients nearing the end of life followed by palliative care providers. All participants will receive a 4-week psilocybin microdosing intervention. The secondary objective is to examine the preliminary efficacy of psilocybin microdosing. Sample Size As this is a feasibility study, no formal sample size calculation was performed to determine the number of patients required to reach a level of precision on any study endpoint. Rather, the goal of this study is to provide estimates, along with their margins of error, of the recruitment rate and efficacy outcomes which will inform a subsequent two-arm randomized controlled trial. Participating sites see approximately 5,300 patients per year. It is anticipated that 30% will have psychological distress. Assuming a minimum of 1 in 6 patients are eligible and 15% of eligible patients will enroll, the goal is to enroll a sample of 20 participants in up to 1-year period. Statistical Analysis Analyses will adopt an intent-to-treat approach. Because the goal of this trial is to demonstrate feasibility and preliminary measures of efficacy, the main analyses will include calculation of feasibility outcomes using descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as well as effect sizes with 95% CIs for primary and secondary efficacy measures, comparing patients' 4-week follow-up assessments to baseline assessments. Participants will also be stratified based on demographic and clinical characteristics to assess trends in outcomes. Notably, there is some evidence that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in particular may attenuate the effects of psilocybin. As such, sub-analyses will evaluate outcomes in participants taking an SSRI medication versus those who are not. A sub-group analysis by setting of care (inpatient vs outpatient/community) will also be conducted. Analyses of safety data will include the mean and standard deviation of the peak effect observed (i.e. highest observed blood pressure, heart rate) and proportion of participants experiencing adverse mood and behaviour events. The incidence of delirium and serotonin syndrome will also be recorded. Details of Eligibility, Intervention Protocol, and Outcome Measures are provided elsewhere.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Phase 1 (week 1): all enrolled participants will take a single 1mg oral dose of psilocybin once per day on Monday and Thursday. If no adverse events are reported at any point during the week (Mon-Fri), the participant will continue to Phase 2 for week 2. Phase 2: The participant will take a single 1mg oral dose of psilocybin once per day for 5 consecutive days (Monday to Friday). If no adverse events are reported at any point during the week (Mon-Fri), the participant will continue to Phase 3 for week 3. Phase 3: The participant will take two 1mg oral doses (2mg total) of psilocybin once per day for 5 consecutive days (Monday to Friday). If no adverse events are reported at any point during the week (Mon-Fri), the participant will continue to Phase 4 for week 4. Phase 4 (maximum allowable dose): The participant will take three 1mg oral doses (3mg total) of psilocybin once per day for 5 consecutive days (Monday to Friday).
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGBruyere Continuing Care
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGRecruitment Rate
Number of patients enrolled divided by number of patients approached
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 1 year
Intervention Completion Rate
Number of participants who complete the intervention divided by number of participants enrolled
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 13 months
Follow-up Completion Rate
Number of participants who complete follow-up divided by number of participants enrolled
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 18 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Change in Blood Pressure
Proportion of participants with systolic blood pressure of \>180mmHg or an increase in 40% from baseline measurements
Time frame: Measured at baseline and daily (Mon-Fri) from enrolment to intervention completion (up to 4 weeks)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Change in Heart Rate
Proportion of participants with resting heart rate \>100bpm or an increase in 40% from baseline
Time frame: Measured at baseline and daily (Mon-Fri) from enrolment to intervention completion (up to 4 weeks)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Delirium
Proportion of participants who develop delirium, measured by the Confusion Assessment Method or the Family Confusion Assessment Method
Time frame: Through intervention completion, up to 4 weeks
Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Serotonin Syndrome
Proportion of participants who develop serotonin syndrome, diagnosed by Study Doctor
Time frame: Through intervention completion, up to 4 weeks
Number of Participants With Adverse Events - Adverse Mood or Behaviour Change
Proportion of participants who report adverse mood or behaviour changes (recorded daily in a participant diary)
Time frame: Measured at baseline and from enrolment to intervention completion (up to 4 weeks); 2-week and 4-week follow-up
Psychological Distress - Anxiety and Depression
Measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (higher score indicate worse anxiety/depression)
Time frame: Baseline
Change in Psychological Distress - Anxiety and Depression
Measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (higher score indicate worse anxiety/depression)
Time frame: Weekly (every Friday) during intervention (4 weeks)
Change in Psychological Distress - Anxiety and Depression
Measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (higher score indicate worse anxiety/depression)
Time frame: Follow-up (1 day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks)
Psychological Distress - Anxiety, Depression, and Well-being
Measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System anxiety, depression, and well-being item scores (score 0-10 for each item - higher scores indicate worse symptoms)
Time frame: Baseline
Change in Psychological Distress - Anxiety, Depression, and Well-being
Measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System anxiety, depression, and well-being item scores (score 0-10 for each item - higher scores indicate worse symptoms)
Time frame: Weekly (every Friday) during intervention (4 weeks)
Change in Psychological Distress - Anxiety, Depression, and Well-being
Measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System anxiety, depression, and well-being item scores (score 0-10 for each item - higher scores indicate worse symptoms)
Time frame: Follow-up (1 day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks)
Psychological Distress - Global Impression of Change
Measured using the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (higher scores indicate greater positive change)
Time frame: Weekly (every Friday) during intervention (4 weeks); 1 day, 2 week, 4 week, 12 week, 24 week follow-up
Dosing
Dose at which therapeutic benefit, if any, is achieved assessed by change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score (score reduction of 50% indicates therapeutic benefit)
Time frame: Weekly (each Friday) for intervention period (4 weeks)
Dosing
Dose at which therapeutic benefit, if any, is achieved assessed by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale score (two-point score reduction or absolute score less than 3 indicate therapeutic benefit)
Time frame: Weekly (each Friday) for intervention period (4 weeks)
Dosing
Dose at which therapeutic benefit, if any, is achieved assessed by Global Impression fo Change score (score of 5 or above indicate therapeutic benefit)
Time frame: Weekly (each Friday) for intervention period (4 weeks)
Existential Distress
Measured using the Demoralization scale II (DS-II), a 16-item questionnaire that measures loss of meaning and purpose, distress, and coping abilities. Each item is rated as a 0 (Never), 1 (Sometimes), or 2 (Often). The 16 items are then summed to create a total score. The highest total score that can be obtained is 32. Higher total scores indicate higher levels of demoralization.
Time frame: Baseline (Friday prior to first dose administered on a Monday); 1 day, 2 week, 4 week, 12 week, 24 week follow-up
Psychological distress
Measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), a 17-item questionnaire. We will consider a 50% reduction in score from baseline as achieving clinically meaningful improvement. Each item varies in the maximum value it can be rated at (an item can be rated from 0-2, 0-3, or 0-4). The highest total score that can be obtained is 53. All scores from the 17-items are summed for a total score. Higher total scores indicate increased severity of depression.
Time frame: Baseline (Friday prior to first dose administered on a Monday); 1 day, 2 week, 4 week, 12 week, 24 week follow-up
Participant Quality of Life
Measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief Version (higher scores indicate higher quality of life)
Time frame: Baseline (Friday prior to first dose administered on a Monday); 1 day, 2 week, 4 week, 12 week, 24 week follow-up
Wish to Die
Measured using the Categories of Attitudes Towards Death Occurrence (scored 1-6 with scores 4-6 indicating a wish to die)
Time frame: Baseline (Friday prior to first dose administered on a Monday); 1 day, 2 week, 4 week, 12 week, 24 week follow-up
Global Distress
Measured using the Distress Thermometer
Time frame: Baseline (Friday prior to first dose administered on a Monday); 1 day, 2 week, 4 week, 12 week, 24 week follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.