The objective of this randomized, double-blind clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical performance of non-carious cervicals adhesive restorations using three self-etching adhesives containing HEMA and 10-MDP monomers.
Sixty teeth (n = 20 for each group) will be randomized into 03 groups: Clearfil SE (contains MDP and HEMA), Optibond All-inOne (contains HEMA) and Prime and Bond Universal (contains neither monomer) dispatch). Restorations will be performed by a single operator, and no mechanical retention will be performed under the cavity. After 6, 12 and 24 months, the restorations will be evaluated by two calibrated examiners, using modified USPHS criteria for retention (kappa = 1.00) and adaptation / marginal color (kappa = 0.81), and the results will be analysed by Fisher and Kruskal-Wallis, respectively. An intragroup analysis will be performed using the Cochran test (for retention) and Wilcoxon (for marginal adaptation / staining).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
18
All patients will receive adhesive composite resin restorations. There will be 3 groups (different adhesives): Clearfil SE, Optibond All-in-One and Prime \& Bond Universal.
Para's Federal University
Belém, Pará, Brazil
Retention rate of restoration
The retention rate will be assessed following the USPHS (United States Public Health) guidelines with the following classifications (acronyms): Alpha = retained. Charlie = mobility or loss.
Time frame: 01 year
Retention rate of restoration
The retention rate will be assessed following the USPHS (United States Public Health) guidelines with the following classifications (acronyms): Alpha = retained. Charlie = mobility or loss.
Time frame: 02 years
Marginal staining rate of restoration
The marginal staining rate will be assessed following the USPHS (United States Public Health) guidelines with the following classifications (acronyms): Alpha = no staining. Bravo = superficial staining (localized or generalized). Charlie = deep staining (localized or generalized).
Time frame: 01 year
Marginal staining rate of restoration
The marginal staining rate will be assessed following the USPHS (United States Public Health) guidelines with the following classifications (acronyms): Alpha = no staining. Bravo = superficial staining (localized or generalized). Charlie = deep staining (localized or generalized).
Time frame: 02 years
Marginal Adaptation rate of restoration
The marginal adaptation rate will be assessed following the USPHS (United States Public Health) guidelines with the following classifications (acronyms): Alpha = no visible evidence of a crack along the edge, the explorer will not penetrate. Bravo = visible evidence of a crack along the margin, dentin unexposed, clinically acceptable. Charlie = explorer penetrates the crack, dentin exposed, clinically unacceptable.
Time frame: 01 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Marginal Adaptation rate of restoration
The marginal adaptation rate will be assessed following the USPHS (United States Public Health) guidelines with the following classifications (acronyms): Alpha = no visible evidence of a crack along the edge, the explorer will not penetrate. Bravo = visible evidence of a crack along the margin, dentin unexposed, clinically acceptable. Charlie = explorer penetrates the crack, dentin exposed, clinically unacceptable.
Time frame: 02 years