This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of combining the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat with rituximab in R/R FL subjects previously treated with at least 2 standard prior systemic treatment regimens where at least 1 anti-CD20-based regimen was used.
This is a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study of oral tazemetostat in combination with rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL). This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tazemetostat in combination with rituximab in subjects previously treated with at least 2 standard prior systemic treatment regimens where at least 1 anti-CD20-based regimen was used, and used and features early futility stopping to maintain subject safety.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
5
Study Drug
Partner Drug
Alabama Oncology
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with WT EZH2 status who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the 2014 Lugano Classification as assessed by investigator and blinded independent review committee (IRC). CR = complete metabolic response per positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) based response or complete radiologic response per CT-based response. PR = partial metabolic response per PET-CT-based response or partial remission per CT-based response.
Time frame: Planned to be assessed during Cycles 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the time of the earliest date of CR or PR per the 2014 Lugano Classification or death, whichever occurred first, as assessed by an IRC. CR= complete metabolic response per PET-CT based response or complete radiologic response per CT-based response. PR= partial metabolic response per PET-CT-based response or partial remission per CT-based response.
Time frame: Planned to be assessed from first dose of study drug to earliest date of disease progression or death as assessed up to 24 months by an IRC
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the earliest date of CR or PR per the 2014 Lugano Classification to documented progression or death, whichever comes first, as assessed by an IRC. CR= complete metabolic response per PET-CT based response or complete radiologic response per CT-based response. PR= partial metabolic response per PET-CT-based response or partial remission per CT-based response.
Time frame: Planned to be assessed from earliest date of CR or PR to documented progression or death as assessed up to 24 months by an IRC
ORR in a Subset of Participants With MT EZH2
ORR was assessed according to 2014 Lugano Classification, in the pooled group regardless of mutation status and in a subset of participants with MT EZH2.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Compassionate Cancer Care
Fountain Valley, California, United States
USOR/Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
Boulder, Colorado, United States
USOR/ Illinois Cancer Specialists
Niles, Illinois, United States
XCancer/ Northwest Oncology & Hematology
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States
Revive/Oakland Medical Group
Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States
Revive/Hematology Oncology Associates of Rockland
Sterling Heights, Michigan, United States
USOR/ NY Oncology Hematology
Albany, New York, United States
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
USOR/ Oncology & Hematology Care Clinical Trials
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
...and 10 more locations
Time frame: Planned to be assessed at the following timepoints: Cycles 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24
ORR in Rituximab Refractory Participants
ORR was assessed according to 2014 Lugano Classification, in rituximab refractory participants.
Time frame: Planned to be assessed at the following timepoints: Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 12, Cycle 18, and Cycle 24.