The purpose of this study is to determine whether a single treatment with administration of NT 201 (botulinum toxin) is superior to placebo (no medicine) for one-sided treatment of essential tremor in the arm (Unilateral Period). Participants will be assigned to the treatment groups by chance and neither the participants nor the research staff who interact with them will know the allocation. The following treatment cycle will investigate the safety and tolerability of two-sided treatment with NT 201 (botulinum toxin) (Open Label Bliaterial Period). All participants will receive NT 201 treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
78
Active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins. Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl).
Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl).
USF, Department of Neurology, Merz Investigational Site #0010020
Tampa, Florida, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Merz Investigational Site #0010269
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Merz Investigational Site #0010457
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center, Merz Investigational Site #0010191
New York, New York, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Neuroscience Institute, Merz Investigational Site #0010206
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Merz Investigational Site #0010226
Houston, Texas, United States
Medstar Georgetown Neurology, Merz Investigational Site #0010231
McLean, Virginia, United States
UW Medical Center - Montlake, Merz Investigational Site #0010450
Seattle, Washington, United States
Selkirk Neurology, Merz Investigational Site #0010456
Spokane, Washington, United States
London Health Sciences Centre, Merz Investigational Site #0010087
London, Ontario, Canada
...and 4 more locations
Change from study baseline to Week 6 in maximum tremor amplitude measurement at wrist level during the unilateral treatment period
Time frame: From baseline to week 6
Change from study baseline to Week 6 in the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale [TETRAS] Performance dominant upper limb [UL] score
Time frame: From baseline to week 6
Change from study baseline to Week 6 in TETRAS Activities of Daily Living [ADL] UL score
Time frame: From baseline to week 6
Change from study baseline to Week 6 in TETRAS ADL Functional Impact score
Time frame: From baseline to week 6
Subject´s Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] score of motor dominant UL at Week 6
Time frame: Week 6
Investigator´s Global Impression of Change Scale [GICS] score of motor dominant UL at Week 6
Time frame: Week 6
Change from Cycle 2 baseline to Week 6 in TETRAS Performance dominant UL score
Time frame: Week 24 to week 36
Change from Cycle 2 baseline to Week 6 in TETRAS Performance subscale score
Time frame: Week 24 to week 36
Change from Cycle 2 baseline to Week 6 in TETRAS ADL UL score
Time frame: Week 24 to week 36
Change from Cycle 2 baseline to Week 6 in TETRAS ADL Functional Impact score
Time frame: Week 24 to week 36
Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs [TEAEs] related to treatment
Time frame: From baseline to week 36
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.